Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Bonu Sayyid

Channel

Bonu Sayyid

@sokinlikuzra

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,032subscribers

+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001622652882
TypeChannel
Username@sokinlikuzra
Created28 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sokinlikuzra

Topic

Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0261,0361,0317 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,028 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,026 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,030 subscribers20 August 2026 — 1,031 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,033 subscribers27 August 2026 — 1,034 subscribers30 August 2026 — 1,036 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,032 subscribers6 September 2026 — 1,035 subscribers11 September 2026 — 1,032 subscribers1,0327 August 202611 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,025–1,038 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 19:361,032-3
6 Sept 2026, 22:161,035+3
2 Sept 2026, 09:141,032-4
30 Aug 2026, 19:571,036+2
27 Aug 2026, 14:181,034+1
24 Aug 2026, 13:391,033+2
20 Aug 2026, 18:241,031+1
17 Aug 2026, 15:351,030+4
14 Aug 2026, 08:451,026-2
11 Aug 2026, 06:381,028-2
8 Aug 2026, 00:311,030no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:001,030first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 14 October 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 January 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
57s
Average length
29s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

944 reactions across 19 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
66270.1%
🔥28229.9%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 944 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 14 October 2024 to 29 January 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
35
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 19 we hold a reading for · 21%
Most on one post
10
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sokinlikuzra. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 14 October 2024 to 29 January 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jan 2026, 11:01 UTC≈4,130 views85 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Oradan deyarli uch yil o’tibdi shu postni yozganimga… U paytlar hali oila qurmagandim, Turkiyada yolg’iz o’zim sayohatlar qilib, ta’lim olib yurar edim. Keyin oila qurdim, qizim tug’ilishi uchun vatanga qaytdim va bir yil Toshkentda bo’ldim. Bu 7 oy davomida onalikning eng go’zal onlarini yashab o’tdim. Lekin hali xanuz olgan ilmimni davom qilish istagi, sog’inchi, hasrati ila… Ammo kuchim yetadimi, oila, bola, ilm

70🔥15

11 Oct 2025, 14:14 UTC≈6,170 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Bu qizlar uchun sahifam, hozircha shu yerdaman💛 Aniq yo’nalishda rivojlantirishga harakatni boshladim🌼 Qo’llab quvvatlab, qo’shilib ham olsangiz bo’ladi (faqat ayol-qizlar uchun) 🥰

17

11 Oct 2025, 14:13 UTC≈6,000 views14 reactionsread 8 August 2026

💖Ona bo’lish - rivojlanishdan to’xtash emas, balki, hayotning yangi sahifasi boshlanishi. 🤩 Sayohat faqat shaharlar aro emas, balki, qalblar aro ham bo’ladi. 📕 Ilm olish umuman vaqt tanlamaydi. Jarayon ko’proq ichki xohish bilan bog’lanadi. Sezganingizdek bu kanalda oilaviy munosabatlar, farzand tarbiyasi, onalik davrida ham ilm o’rganish va sayohatlar mavzusida gaplashamiz🌼 Kanalda o’z shaxsiy fikrlarim va hayot

14

18 Jun 2025, 10:50 UTC≈7,770 views52 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Sinov kelganda unga boshidanoq go’zal sabr qilish mushkul. Xatto sabr yo’lini topa turib, yana orada oqsashlar bo’ladi. Ayniqsa u paytlar jismonan yolg’izlikda qolib ketish ishni yana-da chigallashtiradi. Ma’lum vaqt yaxshi yurasan, orada tanaffus qilib yana turli fikrlar, holatni o’ylayverish, noumidlikka sho’ng’ib qolish boshlanadi. Tabiiki bu vaqtlar o’zimizni chalg’itishga, yomon fikrlardan uzoq turishga va ko’p

42🔥10

15 Jun 2025, 06:10 UTC≈6,400 views142 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Qizim, Safiyanurim💕 Oramizga, bu sinovlarga boy dunyoga xush keldiz. Siz haqizda bilganimdan buyon siz bilan huddi katta insondek bilib gaplashamiz, ilmlar o’rgatib kelvommiz. Endi esa chin hayot ilmlari boshlanadi. Siz uchun ham, biz uchun ham. Ota-onalik shunchaki oddiy maqom emas ekan. Buni shu oylar davomida yaxshigina angladim. Ulkan ma’suliyat insonni yelkasiga yuklanar ekan-ki, uni to’g’ri boshqarish mushkul

🔥7765

19 May 2025, 19:14 UTC≈6,850 views29 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026

O’zi hayotidan baxtsiz insonlar, boshqalardagi baxtni ham ko’pdek ko’rishadi. Aslida insondagi baxt qayerdan, nimadan shakllanadi? U aynan nimalargadur bog’liqmi? Moddiyat, farzand, oila, sog’liq… Menimcha aynan nimagadur bog’lanmaydi. Chunki bu dunyo mukammallik olami emas. Shunga ko’ra har birimizda biror noqislik albatta topiladi. Birimiz moddiy boymiz, ammo sog’liq noqis. Birimizda esa umuman teskarisi. Ya’ni ha

21🔥8

20 Apr 2025, 07:39 UTC≈6,160 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Go’zaaal yoyilib o’tirish😌 Qizlar sahifasi ochilgandan so’ng, bu sahifamda ancha tinchib ketdim. Ammo shu kunlar qaytish niyatim bor, ichimda yig’ilgan gaplar ko’p💕 Hozircha shunday ishlar bilan bandman. Yana eski o’zimni topib, rasmlar, ranglar olamiga sho’ng’iganman @sokinlikuzra

32🔥5

19 Jan 2025, 05:50 UTC≈9,470 views64 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Kitob + tabiat = yoqimli birlik🤩 @sokinlikuzra

🔥4123

11 Jan 2025, 12:06 UTC≈8,990 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

“Qishning quyoshi, ayolning ko’z yoshi, amirning iltifoti, dushmanning nasihati va dengizning sukunati aldamchidir” Usmonlichaning eski mashxur jumlalaridan🪶 @sokinlikuzra

23🔥7

11 Jan 2025, 11:38 UTC≈7,850 views27 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026

Onalik, aytishda oson ammo yashab o’tilishi qiyin va bir tomondan umuman o’zgacha hislarni in’om etuvchi jarayon bo’lsa kerak. Shu uchun ham balki “ona bo’lmaguncha onangni anglay olmaysan” deyilar… Onalikning ilk g’amxo’rlik davrlari to farzand vujudda ekan boshlanadi. Balki aslida undan oldin ham bu ka’bi hislar insonda bo’lar. Biroq, baribir u vujuddaligini bilingandan so’ng ilk onalik instinktlari ishlay boshlas

🔥216

23 Dec 2024, 16:38 UTC≈7,150 views32 reactions10 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Odatda 0-3 oydagi bolalarga oq-qora rangdagi kitob va kartochkalar orqali ta’lim boshlashni tavsiya qilishadi. Nimaga unday deydigan bo’lsak: - Bolaning ilk oylarida hali ko’rish qobiliyati yaxshi rivojlanmagan bo’lib, u faqat oq-qora ranglarni yaxshi farqlay oladi. Va bunday ranglar bolaning diqqatini yetarlicha jalb qiladi, samarali ko’rish mashqlari o’rnida xizmat qiladi. Ranglarni ajrata olish qobiliyati astali

27🔥5

18 Dec 2024, 11:47 UTC≈6,550 views77 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

“Sevgan insonlaringizni rivojlanishga majbur qilish, berilishi eng qiyin va eng muhim sevgi turidir.” • Ray Dalio @sokinlikuzra

64🔥13

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sokinlikuzra. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Salatlar Retseptlari
@SALATLAR_RETSEPTI_AYOLLAR_KANALI · 35,457
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 30 here — alongside 29 others — read 29 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Bonu Sayyid” (@sokinlikuzra), 1,032 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sokinlikuzra.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.