Channel
@sohrab_khatami73
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,456subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003770105753 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sohrab_khatami73 |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 17 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sohrab_khatami73 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 1,456 | -11 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 15:26 | 1,467 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:53 | 1,470 | +6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 | 1,464 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1,464 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 17 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 June 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 7,385 |
| Reactions total | 150 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 08:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
210 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 152 | 72.4% | |
| 👍 | 39 | 18.6% | |
| 🤬 | 11 | 5.24% | |
| 👏 | 3 | 1.43% | |
| 👎 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 😱 | 2 | 0.952% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.476% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 210reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 17 June 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
نفت نفروشیم چی میشه؟؟؟ دولت برای هزینه هاش چون درآمد نداره مجبوره ریال چاپ کنه چاپ ریال مساویست با افزایش قیمت دلار... یکی از هزینه های دلاری دولت چیه؟ واردات بنزین دولت میگه من مجبورم قیمت یک لیتر بنزین 10 تومن برسونم تا مردم هم کم مصرف کنند و هم من مجبور نشم ریال چاپ کنم بله با افزایش قیمت بزنین تورمی تو همه جا ایجاد میشه ولی ( چاره ندارن و الا احمق نبودن زیر فحش خوردن برن ) اگر دقت کنید سوخت CNG رایگان شده دلیل…
❤8
امروز پزشکیان یه حرفی زد اگر دقت میکردی توش کلی دیتا اقتصادی بود.. گفت اگر 20 درصد در مصرف انرژی صرفه جویی کنیم یعنی عددی نزدیک به میزان فروش نفتون کاهش هزینه دادیم میدونی یعنی چی؟؟ یعنی اینکه ما نفت نمیتونیم بفروشیم مردم صرفه جویی کنید خب تا کی نمیتونی بفروشی؟ تا زمانی ک محاصره آمریکا وجود داره
❤5
وقتی بدونی ک قراره با ایجاد اغتشاش هممون رو مجبور به هم وطن کشی کنند حرف وحدت اقارو با گوشت و پوست استخونت درک میکنی... وحدت نداشته باشیم قراره خیلی تلفات بدیم مردم هنوز جنگ واقعی رو درک نکردند اسرائیل و آمریکا جنگ کثیف خودشون رو هنوز شروع نکردند ک.. تو عراق یک میلیون آدم کشتن تو افغانستان 300 هزار نفر تو ایران ک هنوز به 5 هزار هم نرسیده حالا تو به من به خاطر حفظ وحدت بگو وفاقی..
❤5
آمریکا بدنبال رژیم چنج بوده و هست. میپرسن آیا جنگ تموم شده؟ من میپرسم مگه تز آمریکا جهان خوار تغییر کرده؟ آمریکا براش ثابت شد در نبرد فیزیکی هیچ غلطی نمیتواند بکند... پس بدنبال راه ساده تره.. چه راهی؟؟؟ همون راهی ک تو دی ماه 404 انجام داد و تونست 3 هزار کشته روز دست جمهوری اسلامی بزاره اونم بدون هیچ هزینه ای... آیا تکرارش میکنه : قطعا بله چجوری؟؟؟ 1..تورم سنگین تا صدای مردم حتی بدنه هسته سخت نظام هم در بیاد 2.ایجا…
❤5
🔴چرا از مقام معظم رهبری هیچ صدایی منتشر نمیشود؟!
❤13👍4
🔴 ترامپ و نتانیاهو سه سناریو برای مقابله با ایران را بررسی کرده اند. یک منبع اسرائیلی : در دیدار ۹۰ دقیقهای دونالد ترامپ و بنیامین نتانیاهو، بخش عمده گفتوگوها به ایران اختصاص داشت و سه گزینه اصلی برای نحوه مواجهه با تهران بررسی شد: 🔹 ۱. ادامه مذاکرات و تلاش برای توافق استیو ویتکاف و جرد کوشنر همچنان در حال مذاکره با طرف ایرانی هستند، اما اختلافات اساسی میان دو طرف باقی مانده است. نتانیاهو در این دیدار نسبت به…
❤8🤬6👍1
طرح ماهان ساواک چه بود؟ هدف آن چه بود؟ ببینید اسرائیل ۵۰ سال پیش در ایران چه طرح هایی را اجرا می کرده است آیا الان بیکار نشسته اند؟
👍15❤4
🔴استاد دانشگاه میامی و تحلیلگر ژئوپلیتیک ▪️کویت نخستین کشوری خواهد بود که سقوط میکند؛ و آن هم بهزودی ایران برخلاف صدام به کویت بسنده نخواهد کرد، بلکه به دیگر کشورهای شورای همکاری خلیج فارس نیز پیشروی خواهد کرد. بحرین، قطر و امارات متحده عربی، سپس عمان و در نهایت عربستان سعودی؛ و در مسیر خود نیز اردن را نابود خواهد کرد. هیچ چیز به اندازه سقوط کشورهای نفتخیز، کمبود سوخت، قحطی و مهاجرت گسترده، معنای «شکست» را نشا…
👍10❤6👎1
سطح جاسوسی رو یا علی... 😳😳
❤11👏2👍1
🔴سخنان قاطع افسر ارشد نیروی دریایی از کف میدان نبرد؛ ضربات روزهای اخیر شدیدتر و دقیق تر بوده 🔹جوسازی رسانهای آمریکا درباره حمله به نقاط حساس ایران، بیش از آنکه با هدف ترساندن مردم انجام شود، تلاشی برای به خطا انداختن محاسبات مسئولان کشور است 🔹این یک جنگ منطقهای نیست که صرفاً با مذاکره پایان یابد؛ بلکه نبردی موجودیتی است که مقابلهای همهجانبه و قاطع میطلبد
❤13👍1
پس مشکلشون بااخونداس
❤11
🔴 برای پشتیبانی هوشمند از جبهه های نبرد آماده شویم از بین بردن پل ها و محورهای مواصلاتی از یا به هرمزگان یکی از سناریوهای اصلی دشمن یعنی ورود به نبرد زمینی را آشکار میسازد. 🔸از جمله اهداف دشمن: ۱_قطع مسیرهای پشتیبانی از خطوط نبرد ۲_کاهش سرعت در نقل و انتقال نیروهای مسلح ۳_اختلال در فرایند شبکه تامین کاملا از یا به استان هرمزگان ۴_فشار بر تخلیه شهرها و بندرها برای شناسایی بهتر جابجایی ها و رزمندگان اسلام 📌سناریوها…
👍7❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sohrab_khatami73. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 806,235 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“سهراب خاتمی” (@sohrab_khatami73), 1,456 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sohrab_khatami73.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.