Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانون ادبی هنری سها

Channel

کانون ادبی هنری سها

@soha_javaneh

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,255subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001573220021
TypeChannel
Username@soha_javaneh
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/soha_javaneh

Growth

1,2471,2571,2526 August 2026 — 1,247 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,247 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,251 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,257 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,255 subscribers1,2556 August 202615 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 9 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,246–1,259 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 13:441,255-2
12 Aug 2026, 11:561,257+6
9 Aug 2026, 05:221,251+4
6 Aug 2026, 08:351,247no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:211,247first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 13 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
35.5%
avg views ÷ 1,255 subscribers
Avg views / post
445
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026
Posts held11 (13 February 202626 July 2026)
Views total2,225
Reactions total66
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC≈254 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

و ملکور را از هنگام طغیان در آینولینداله پیش آغاز توان آفریدن هیچ آفرینه ای نبود که او را از خود جان باشد یا چیزی شبیه به جان: چنین است سخن دانایان و در ژرفای تاریکی دل هاشان اورکها از خداوندگاری که بیمناک خدمت اش می کردند و تنها آفریدگار شور بختی شان بود، متنفر بودند. این شاید که رذیلانه ترین کار ملکور بود و در نزد ایلوواتار نفرت انگیزترین. در چهارمین جلسه با محوریت کتاب سیلماریلیون از دنیای ارباب حلقه ها، نوشته تال

25 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC≈1,080 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

📷🧙‍♂ گزارش ویدیویی چهارمین جلسه حلقه خیال (ادبیات فانتزی) ، با محوریت کتاب سیلماریلیون - مرداد ۱۴۰۵ #جوانه #سها #خیال #ادبیات_فانتزی #سیلماریلیون #تالکین #گزارش_ویدیویی @Soha_javaneh 💫 @javaneh_club 🌱

23 Jul 2026, 14:30 UTC≈287 views17 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @javaneh_clubPhoto

اولین هم‌نشینی جوانه برای روییدن 🌱 در میان تمام هیاهوها، جوانه را خلق کردیم؛ برای روییدن، برای سبز شدن، برای نفس کشیدن و نفس بخشیدن. ولیکن در روزگاری غرق در تاریکی و تیغ ظلمت، ریشه هایمان خشکیدند، جوانه هامان پژمردند، رنگ هامان نور باختند و چشم‌هامان خون گریستند. آیدا و عرفان عزیزمان رفتند و مارا در سیاهچالی از بهت و اشک گذاشتند. جوانه نفس باخت و لایه لایه خاک را در آغوش کشید. حال ما مانده‌ایم... ما بازماندگان از رو

20 Jul 2026, 18:17 UTC≈367 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @javaneh_club

از آخرین باری که کنار هم جمع شدیم، قریب به ۷ ماه گذشته. روزها گذشته اما خودمان را در آن روزها جا گذاشته‌ایم. قطار زمان ایستاده. اما جهانی اتفاق افتاده. هر شب پشت پلک‌هامان فیلم روزهایی پخش می‌شود که حتی در تاریک‌ترین ساعات آن، واقعیت امروز را خیال نمی‌کردیم. حالا در واقعیتی نزدیک، خیلی نزدیک، روزهایی را دیده‌ایم که باران بلا خانه‌هامان را خراب، و گرد و خاک طوفان عزا، ذره ذره وجودمان را سوراخ کرده. خیابان‌های اطراف دا

26 Feb 2026, 05:20 UTC≈931 views63 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @anjomane_pezeshki

چند خطی در باب واژه پرتکرار «شرف» اتفاقات هفته‌های اخیر در دانشگاه، همگان را از سطح خشونت بهت‌زده کرده است. هرچند شاید اشتباه از ماست که هنوز تعجب می‌کنیم و گمان می‌بریم مرزهایی از اخلاق باقی مانده است. وگرنه حاکمیتی که تنها در دو شب، چندین هزار نفر را به گلوله بسته، پیش‌تر با ما اتمام حجت کرده است. وقایع هفته اخیر در دانشگاه تهران، به‌ویژه روز دوشنبه، بسیاری را به یاد حوادث کوی دانشگاه در سال ۷۸ انداخت؛ چرا که این

18 Feb 2026, 19:05 UTC≈1,030 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026
File

ویژه نامه پورسینا «برای آیدا» بِأَی‌ِّ ذَنب‌ٍ قُتِلَت به کدامین گناه کشته شد؟ #برای_آیدا #برای_ایران_فردا @poursina_news

18 Feb 2026, 19:05 UTC≈803 views26 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @javaneh_clubPhoto

ادای احترام باشکوه دانشجویان و دانشگاه به شهید وطن: آیدا حیدری خانواده و دوستان و دوستداران آیدا امروز میهمان خانه‌ی دوم آیدا بودند. صدها دانشجو به احترام میهمان ایستادند و بارها نام او را صدا زدند. آیدا در خانه غایب بود، اما دوستان و هم دانشگاهی هایش نگذاشتند کسی احساس غربت کند. آیدا امروز نظاره گر سربلندی ِ دانشجویان و دانشگاه در مقابل خانواده اش بود، هنگامی که سیل جمعیت شکافت و پدر، مادر، خواهر، مادربزرگ و اقوام

17 Feb 2026, 09:38 UTC≈616 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @anjomane_pezeshkiPhoto

مراسم چهلم دکتر آیدا حیدری برگزار می‌شود. 🗓 چهارشنبه ۲۹ بهمن ۱۴۰۴ ⏰ ساعت ۱۵ تا ۱۷ 📌 مکان: تالار ابن‌سینا، دانشکده پزشکی دانشگاه علوم پزشکی تهران چهل روز گذشته اما پرسشی هنوز بی‌پاسخ مانده است: بِأَیِّ ذَنبٍ قُتِلَت؟ حضور شما، ادامه‌ی حافظه‌ی جمعی ماست. @anjomane_pezeshki

13 Feb 2026, 11:23 UTC≈958 views71 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

در سوگت، موهایمان پناه گل‌های پرپر شده است. -چهلمین روز از رفتن آیدا. بهشت زهرا تهران #برای_آیدا #برای_ایران_فردا

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @soha_javaneh. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 100,639 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

روابط عاطفی با ساناز شفیعی
@sanaz_shafieiii · 126,703
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانون ادبی هنری سها” (@soha_javaneh), 1,255 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soha_javaneh.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.