Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Косметология.В эпицентре событий.

Channel

Косметология.В эпицентре событий.

@sofyapakhomova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

928subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001744664452
TypeChannel
Username@sofyapakhomova
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sofyapakhomova

Growth

9189289237 August 2026 — 918 subscribers8 August 2026 — 918 subscribers14 August 2026 — 928 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 917–930 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 06:59928+10
8 Aug 2026, 01:01918no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:49918first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 16 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
32.9%
avg views ÷ 928 subscribers
Avg views / post
305
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
14.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 August 2026
Posts held19 (16 June 20261 August 2026)
Views total915
Reactions total130
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
5m 35s
Average length
1m 07s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

636 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
30648.1%
🔥18929.7%
💯589.12%
👏192.99%
❤‍🔥182.83%
😁111.73%
👍81.26%
🙏71.10%
😍60.943%
🥰40.629%
🏆30.472%
👌30.472%
🍾20.314%
🕊20.314%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 636reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 1 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 19 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sofyapakhomova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 16 June 2026 to 1 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

1 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC223 views45 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Отвечаю в инстаграмме, но могу и здесь . Речь о небезызвестном «косметологе» , волшебным образом вылечивающей розацеа с помощью пилингов и инъекции гиалуроновой кислоты по ЗАПАТЕНОВАННЫМ ТОЧКАМ. Удивительным образом к ней не зарастает народная тропа. Мне лично интересно только одно в этой ситуации(как бывшего психиатра), чем берет и откуда до сих пор у нашего народа вагон и маленькая тележка доверия волшебным таблет

💯28🔥115😁1

Signed Софья Пахомова

24 Jul 2026, 14:49 UTC336 views41 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итак, как мы уже знаем,в 1930–1940-х годах тестостерон активно применяли в «женской медицине». Но потом произошло идеальное медицинское преступление. Не сухая история, а почти расследование)) ⛔️Тестостерон не запретили женщинам. Его просто… назначили мужчиной. Настолько убедительно, что через 90 лет фраза «тестостерон у женщины» для многих звучит как начало необратимой вирилизации. Вначале победила эстрогеновая мо

🔥2410❤‍🔥7

Signed Софья Пахомова

21 Jul 2026, 16:06 UTC356 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Каждой девочке рано или поздно абсолютно необходимы девочковые выходные. Во-первых, обсудить всех мальчиков. Своих, чужих, настоящих, прошедших и непременно будущих. Устать от этого адски, плюнуть и найти занятие поинтереснее. Во-вторых, не спать пол ночи рассказывая другу другу одному Богу неизвестно что, а вторую половину ночи-потому что матрас/подушка/срочные мысли/фильм забыла досмотреть и ваще.., кто ж спит когд

22🔥15😁4🍾2❤‍🔥1

Signed Софья Пахомова

20 Jul 2026, 12:47 UTC347 views20 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Есть ли среди моих подписчиков ощутившие эффекты ЗГТ тестостероном? Есть ли те, кого пугает даже сама мысль о таком назначении? Не стесняемся, выходим из сумрака)) Докажем, что у вас не выросли усы и..еще что поинтереснее🧐!

9😁6👏4👌1

Signed Софья Пахомова

20 Jul 2026, 12:24 UTC348 views44 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Любое упоминание тестостерона в терапии женщины сегодня нередко воспринимается как нечто новое, смелое и почти экспериментальное. Меж тем, этой новой моде без малого …90 лет, дорогие мои🤔 Еще вчера этот гормон принадлежал исключительно мужчинам, мы родились и выросли в незыблемости этой аксиомы! А тут такое некорректное предложение «попробовать» в аnti-age у женщин?? «Хочешь жить будущим, знай свое прошлое» Цитата

🔥30💯7🙏61

Signed Софья Пахомова

13 Jul 2026, 18:37 UTC539 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Набросок -демонстратор. Раскрывающий тему AntiAge у непростых пациентов💯

🔥11👏74🥰2

Signed Софья Пахомова

13 Jul 2026, 18:26 UTC390 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Опять и снова задам вопрос! Буду признательна, если вы, мои дорогие подписчики, не проигнорите мои призывы к взаимодействию🤓❗️ Вопрос таков! Есть ли понимание, что если у человека(не буду говорить-пациента) есть хронические заболевания кожи, пусть и в стадии длительной ремиссии(акне, розацеа, себорейный дерматит, периоральный дерматит, псориаз, КПЛ и тд.и тп) процедуры по омоложению или AntiAge процедуры должны пров

11🔥4💯2🥰2

Signed Софья Пахомова

9 Jul 2026, 14:18 UTC478 views22 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026

Почему я написала этот пост, и почему эта тема важна. Краткие комментарии от автора👇👇 Много, а последнее время очень много «диагнозов» в сети вирусится. И это проблема.. Нет никакого фильтра, никто не контролирует, никак не исправляет. То что пациент себя уже давно лечит перелечивает на основе некорректных заявлений, это одна сторона медали. Но вот вторая 🏅серьезней, как по мне. Врачи стали «учиться» на таких приме

16💯4🔥2

Signed Софья Пахомова

9 Jul 2026, 12:27 UTC458 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

На просторах виртуального нашего социума, все чаще встречаюсь с одной из самых частых ошибок в диагностике-убеждением, что на лице пациента должен быть только один диагноз. Но, как показывает практика, кожа не почитывает наши учебники на досуге🤗 Она не в курсе, что розацеа не должна сочетаться с периоральным дерматитом, или акне обязано автоматически исключать розацеа, или категорически не допускать существования ма

15👍6💯6

Signed Софья Пахомова

28 Jun 2026, 11:29 UTC547 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моя генетическая конструкция такова, что всю жизнь я минимизировала физические нагрузки с весами. Видимо рецепторная активность, а может и масштабность распространения тестостероновых рецепторов моих очень велика…, и я давала рост мышц даже на кардио тренировках(если честно, то даже на йоге с пилатесом). И возможно🤔, именно по этой причине, возрастное падение тестостерона, я почувствовала гораздо ярче и сильнее, чем

30🔥8👍2

Signed Софья Пахомова

26 Jun 2026, 12:40 UTC483 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Почему я не практикую онлайн консультации у пациентов с розацеа… Все просто-как показывает многолетняя практика, такие консультации лишены всякого смысла. ✅есть врачи от Бога, ✅есть..- ну, с Богом, ✅а есть-не дай Бог… Как вы предлагаете управлять на расстоянии вторыми и тем более третьими?🧐 Ну а если вы попали к первым, я-то вам точно без надобности? ПОЭТОМУ‼️ В планах на ближайшее время. 📌Закрытый клуб для враче

24❤‍🔥7🔥3

Signed Софья Пахомова

23 Jun 2026, 11:21 UTC571 views48 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Итак, краткое резюме по отдыху женщины за…( ладно, не принято, так не принято🫡) ✅если не любишь все эти правильные брассы в бассейне ,так и забудь про них уже, можешь себе позволить. Баня, холодный душ и Балийский массаж -вполне приемлемая замена, как оказалось. ✅свежий воздух в раю из сосен, повышает уровень #алкогольдегидрогеназы в разы.. есть минусы-игристое пить надоедает. ✅душ Шарко-забытая и мало кем адекватн

34🔥14

Signed Софья Пахомова

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @sofyapakhomova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 422,196 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Косметология.В эпицентре событий.” (@sofyapakhomova), 928 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sofyapakhomova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.