7 measurements spanning 19 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,521–1,548 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
25 Aug 2026, 22:13
1,545
+7
23 Aug 2026, 06:19
1,538
+4
19 Aug 2026, 09:56
1,534
+2
16 Aug 2026, 18:26
1,532
+6
13 Aug 2026, 09:46
1,526
+2
7 Aug 2026, 06:50
1,524
no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:16
1,524
first reading
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 10 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
81.7%
avg views ÷ 1,545 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,260
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.98%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
18 (10 June 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
6,312
Reactions total
251
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 18:10 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
902 reactions across 18 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
581
64.4%
😍
98
10.9%
🫡
45
4.99%
🤩
41
4.55%
👍
38
4.21%
👀
23
2.55%
❤🔥
18
2.00%
🥰
17
1.88%
🙏
14
1.55%
🍾
7
0.776%
👾
7
0.776%
⚡
4
0.443%
🔥
4
0.443%
✍
2
0.222%
🐳
1
0.111%
🤣
1
0.111%
🦄
1
0.111%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 902reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I hope you like puppets 👀 We will have these 2 available (Belgian Malinois & Black Wolf) at our Megaplex booth (silent auction and on telegram Friday through Saturday). These are our first puppets available to the public and we are so excited. Both come with removable magnetic rods so they are easier to transport and dress up. Auction info and videos will be coming soon ⭐️
SCAMMER ALERT 🚨 this user is NOT US, please help report on Instagram @ mixedcandyfursuit to avoid people falling for this account. I also know they are watching this channel since they copy paste everything I post 🤨
Quick reminder that all of our toy designs are limited in runs. We have been getting a few emails asking for toys that are sold out but forget that everything we do is a limited run. It helps us keep the designs fresh and not stuck with designs over time. So if you see a design you like please do not wait on getting it, as it may not be available soon after.
We will have a few silent auctions at our Megaplex booth this year. We will have 2 puppets (wolf and a Gshep) which will be our first ever puppets offered by us as Mixedcandy/SoftCandy. We will have 2 partials (with set prices) and 1 giant inflatable/plush hybrid wolf dog which is one of a kind and our first from our shop (excited to show him completed). A few had expressed interest in bidding on the plush and puppet…
WIP ⚠️ Hope you like giant plush 👀 this one off big wolf is taking shape just in time for Megaplex. He will be up for auction at our booth. Just a preview for now, can’t wait to share the gorgeous tipped brown fur we are using.
Still going through minor revisions but we are getting so close to happy with the design. Manufacturer just sent us photos last night but I pointed out 2 parts that needed to be altered. The color between the eyes was made dark brown instead of tan which will be changed. The 2nd part was the cheek dot, they made it too small so it was hard to see. I like cheek dots so I want them to be a bit bolder when you look at t…
❤48👍3🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @softcandytoys. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 67,105 of 1,620,105entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SoftCandyToys” (@softcandytoys), 1,545 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/softcandytoys.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.