Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐁𝐲 𝐒𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐚

Channel

𝐁𝐲 𝐒𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐚

@sofiagoriunova

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,923subscribers

-109 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001936177373
TypeChannel
Username@sofiagoriunova
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 September 2026
Measurements held13
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sofiagoriunova

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 64% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,9233,0322,977.57 August 2026 — 3,032 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,032 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,023 subscribers14 August 2026 — 3,013 subscribers17 August 2026 — 3,002 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,994 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,981 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,980 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,974 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,963 subscribers7 September 2026 — 2,950 subscribers11 September 2026 — 2,934 subscribers15 September 2026 — 2,923 subscribers7 August 202615 September 2026
13 measurements spanning 39 days, net -109. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,907–3,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Sept 2026, 19:372,923-11
11 Sept 2026, 21:212,934-16
7 Sept 2026, 07:002,950-13
2 Sept 2026, 18:272,963-11
30 Aug 2026, 11:132,974-6
27 Aug 2026, 21:282,980-1
24 Aug 2026, 12:132,981-13
20 Aug 2026, 23:462,994-8
17 Aug 2026, 21:143,002-11
14 Aug 2026, 19:453,013-10
11 Aug 2026, 04:013,023-9
8 Aug 2026, 08:373,032no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:473,032first reading

Engagement

7 posts held, back to 20 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 7 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
11s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

216 reactions across 7 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5324.5%
🤩4520.8%
🔥3616.7%
🥰177.87%
🍓156.94%
💘146.48%
136.02%
👍115.09%
💯104.63%
💋20.926%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 7 we hold a reading for · 14%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sofiagoriunova. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 7 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 19:01 UTC581 views18 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

🤍🦷🪥 -колхозный? 🤨 ну точно не в медицинском костюме от Lancet.Uniform

9💘4🤩31🍓1

28 Jul 2026, 19:51 UTC281 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

девочки’ 🤍 хочу с вами поделиться, чтобы вы меня не теряли! на моё удивление я сделала уклон на запретграмм (в последние годы я терпеть не могла эту соцсеть), а теперь очень нравится составлять там посты и выстраивать визуал, поэтому оставлю вам ссылочку, обязательно посмотрите ☁️

13🤩6🍓5

28 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC226 views19 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Девочки, я влюбилась в BIOPOINT DELICATO 🤍 Раньше как-то проходила мимо этого бренда, и зря! У меня шампунь и бальзам из линейки DELICATO — и я просто кайфую после каждого мытья головы🛁🫧 Что я заметила сразу: 💧 Мягкость и шелковистость — волосы после использования просто текут сквозь пальцы. Никакой жесткости и сухости. 💧 Легкое расчесывание — волосы не путаются, даже без специальных спреев. Для моей длины это на

105🍓4

20 Jul 2026, 11:13 UTC324 views23 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Наконец-то нашла свою идеальную пару для волос от Holly Polly! 🤍 Начну с Pure Angel 🤍🪽 Это сухой шампунь без отдушки — мечта для тех, кто устал от резких химических запахов. Oн работает просто волшебно: пара распылений у корней — и волосы выглядят чистыми, объёмными и свежими! Никакого белого налёта, никакой липкости, только лёгкость и рассыпчатость. Витамин Е в составе — приятный бонус, волосы блестят и выглядят зд

💘10🍓5🤩5💋21

7 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC519 views55 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Photo

Мы с подругой сходили на дофаминовый мастер-класс в студию рисования «РИСУЙ» — и это было потрясающе! 🍋🖌️🎨 Рисовали сочные лимоны, и процесс оказался настоящей терапией. Яркие краски, расслабленная атмосфера и полное погружение в творчество подарили море позитива🖼️ Получили огромное удовольствие и красивые картины на память. Обязательно посетим студию ещё раз!🤍

🔥23🥰17🤩131💯1

24 Jun 2026, 10:10 UTC567 views38 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

маникюр студента-медика перед практикой: — очень красиво! luxio innocent в два слоя 🤍 Soyka на Серхуповской теперь определенно в списке фаворитов!

🤩1812💯5🔥3

20 Jun 2026, 19:07 UTC602 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Новинка: бренд MEM:MO уже в продаже с двумя продуктами. Меня покорили дизайн и составы — делюсь впечатлениями🤍 Шампунь🧴 · Энергокомплекс (диаминопиримидиноксид + ПДО) — укрепляет корни и стимулирует рост. · Кератин — заполняет повреждения кутикулы. · Экстракты женьшеня, имбиря, горечавки, солодки — тонизируют и успокаивают кожу. Результат: мягкое очищение без сухости. Маска для повреждённых волос🫧🛁 · Керамиды + к

14👍11🔥10💯4

Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @sofiagoriunova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐁𝐲 𝐒𝐨𝐟𝐢𝐚” (@sofiagoriunova), 2,923 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sofiagoriunova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.