Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Софья Епифанова

Channel

Софья Епифанова

@sofiaepifanova

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

244subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002137953747
TypeChannel
Username@sofiaepifanova
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live22 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 22 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sofiaepifanova

Growth

2442542497 August 2026 — 254 subscribers8 August 2026 — 254 subscribers14 August 2026 — 249 subscribers22 August 2026 — 244 subscribers7 August 202622 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 15 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 243–256 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
22 Aug 2026, 17:03244-5
14 Aug 2026, 12:36249-5
8 Aug 2026, 09:19254no change
7 Aug 2026, 08:47254first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 22 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

491 reactions across 17 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16934.4%
🔥11423.2%
👍8617.5%
🤣499.98%
custom 5231100974881334052142.85%
😱142.85%
custom 5201672382955150475132.65%
❤‍🔥132.65%
😁112.24%
👏30.611%
😍30.611%
😭20.407%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 491reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 22 June 2026 to 8 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Jul 2026, 10:31 UTC50 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

В МАХ моя новая фотосессия https://max.ru/join/kHtrRKtdLgZaxDe_hXoAKrJW8ihjEx_9V59UIEog4Ng Всех жду смотреть😜

1👏1🔥1

26 Jun 2026, 07:34 UTC122 views51 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Приготовьте платочки. Не знаю для смеха или для слез. Повезла кота на уколы. По дороге он устроил потоп в котовозке так, что с неё текло. Я закинула ее в багажник, а кота посадила в машину. ЭТО БЫЛО САМОЕ ОПРОМЕТЧИВОЕ РЕШЕНИЕ В МОЕЙ ЖИЗНИ. Всю дорогу он ползал по салону, нажимал на стеклоподъёмники, открывал окна, залез на панель, потом на руль и начал сигналить. Одна машина от испуга съехала на обочину, а потом об

17👍15🔥12😁3custom 52016723829551504752custom 52311009748813340522

26 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC84 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера вот стояли в очереди на заправку. Увлекательный аттракцион.

👍12😱9🤣7custom 52016723829551504752custom 52311009748813340522

26 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC81 views21 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Осталось ещё 3 дня свозить кота на уколы, после чего будет приниматься решение - оставить хвост или ампутировать. Примерно три недели назад ему кто-то прокусил хвост насквозь (кот или собака). Хвост в этом месте воспалился. Сейчас проходим уже второй курс лечения антибиотиками.

7😱5👍4🔥3😭2

26 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC61 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кот в ветеринарку ездил в состоянии абсолютного принятия. Говорит, что он своё отбоялся. И ему этот мир абсолютно понятен. Если в его взгляде вы прочитаете «выпусти меня, кожаная тварь» - вам показалось.

10👍7🤣6custom 52016723829551504752custom 52311009748813340522

26 Jun 2026, 07:33 UTC55 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сняла первый урожай 🥳

7🔥5👍4

26 Jun 2026, 07:31 UTC51 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Сейчас будет новая порция постов из моего канала в МАХ за последние несколько дней. Ждите спам 😂 А лучше приходите ко мне в МАХ и смотрите весь контент в моменте

6

23 Jun 2026, 06:26 UTC76 views24 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вчера вечером рисовала полосочку краской на улице, уделалась вся: руки, ноги, футболка. Растворителя дома не оказалось. Сега оттирал краску с меня 95-ым бензином. Так что теперь я очень дорого пахну (по нынешним ценам на бензин).

8😁8🤣6👍2

23 Jun 2026, 06:25 UTC72 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Для тех, кто не смотрит кружочки: Провожу эксперимент - выращиваю помидоры дома (не в огороде). Черри поспели, уже можно есть. А вот из больших краснеет пока только одна. А хотите покажу свой огород? ❤️ - если да 👍🏻 - если «че мы там не видели»

8🔥8👍7

23 Jun 2026, 06:21 UTC53 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

9🔥8🤣6

23 Jun 2026, 06:13 UTC60 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вчера эта «пудель на минималках» повезла кота в Ветеринарку. Всю дорогу он истошно орал. В Ветеринарке меня отправили в аптеку за препаратами. Кота, сказали, можно оставить. Я думаю: «Ага, щас. Через 5 минут вы выставите этого орущего демона на улицу или воткнете успокоительное». Вслух говорю: «Отлично, поехала!». Возвращаюсь через 20 минут. Открываю дверь, представляя его с заклеенным ртом. А этот... ЖУЧАРА! Разва

9🔥8🤣8

23 Jun 2026, 06:11 UTC53 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Давайте я выскажусь о второй прочитанной и закроем тему книг ещё недели на две. «Палач любви» Ирвина Ялома Кааааак же сильно его хаяли в книжном клубе. Писали, что никогда не хотели бы прийти на приём к такому психотерапевту, что это страшно - знать, о чём он думает во время сессий. Как же он плохо работает. И всё в этом духе. Но знаете что? Я наоборот считаю, что ценность этой книги Ялома как раз в том, что он от

11👍10🔥9❤‍🔥1custom 52016723829551504751custom 52311009748813340521

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @sofiaepifanova. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 357,332 of 1,584,420entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Софья Епифанова” (@sofiaepifanova), 244 subscribers as measured 22 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sofiaepifanova.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.