Помогаю найти и принять себя
Спикер TEDx, бакалавр соционики
Адепт и эксперт системы Кибби
Научу видеть красоту, а не недостатки
Instagram (запрещен в РФ): https://instagram.com/socionality
Автор: @AnastasiaXr
http://socionality.ru
№ 4974220658
Created
Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
8 measurements spanning 20 days, net -64. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,901–9,985 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
27 Aug 2026, 07:36
9,911
-14
24 Aug 2026, 13:19
9,925
-6
20 Aug 2026, 16:26
9,931
-10
17 Aug 2026, 22:23
9,941
-14
14 Aug 2026, 13:36
9,955
-1
11 Aug 2026, 03:26
9,956
-19
7 Aug 2026, 07:30
9,975
no change
7 Aug 2026, 07:25
9,975
first reading
Engagement
80 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.0%
avg views ÷ 9,911 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,090
80 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.51%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
80
of 80 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 69 of 80 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 28 August 2026
Posts held
80 (3 August 2026 – 28 August 2026)
Views total
87,546
Reactions total
4,325
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
28 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈4,590
Videos
≈2,420
Links
≈1,350
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 28 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
5m 02s
Average length
22s
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,325 reactions across 67 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
2,073
47.9%
🔥
1,163
26.9%
😁
403
9.32%
👍
361
8.35%
💯
150
3.47%
custom 5433856365061746058
43
0.994%
custom 5370677443382221953
25
0.578%
🤩
25
0.578%
😢
19
0.439%
🥰
19
0.439%
🤝
18
0.416%
👏
11
0.254%
🦄
5
0.116%
💅
4
0.092%
🙏
3
0.069%
💘
2
0.046%
🤓
1
0.023%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 69 of the 80 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,325reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 80 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @socionality. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 80 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Штирлиц нуждается в поддержке. Слабая этика отношений, люди совершенно непонятны, не видно, кто изменяет, кто истинный друг, а кто использует. Может не видеть, не признавать очевидных вещей, пока не столкнется с фактами.
Тут слепое пятно, ничего не видно, нет опоры. Вот ответ, почему успешная женщина не видела очевидных вещей.
Все это подробно обсуждаем на консультациях лично про вас: как выкручиваться и прикрывать…
Деловые логики видят из чего состоит любой процесс, из каких этапов и ресурсов.
Сочетание логики и сенсорики даёт твердость в отстаивании своих утверждений, раз сказала, значит, сказала, точка.
Про режим дня, что слышим? Рациональность! Этот юнговский признак рац-иррац часто путают с логикой. А еще он размывается у некоторых типов. Но не у Ксении! Логик сенсорик рационал — самый рациональный рационал. Про остальны…
Сегодня у нас Ксения Бородина, вы не раз просили её разбор.
Вы просили — мы сделали. Про Ксюшу и её отношение с мужчинами и не только, взглянем через призму соционики
Ваши гипотезы ее типа ДО разбора пишите в комментариях👇🏻
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение!
Здравствуйте, Анастасия 🤗
Скажите, пожалуйста, есть какие-то более менее точные указания человек логик или этик? В маме никак понять не могу, хотя сама этик, всегда думала, что и она этик,но, по моему, она не так шарит в людях как я, не чувствует их, что ли. Может, просто не в типе.
Или не делать мозг и отправить на типирование?
Благодарю ☺️
У меня для вас письмо, но я вам его не…
💬
У тебя новое анонимное сообщение!
Здравствуйте. Почему Драйзеру может быть сложно заводить друзей и поддерживать дружбу? Он в типе, работа по типу, но людям не особо нравится. Близких немного, но со всеми очень долгие, стабильные и хорошие отношения. А вот новых друзей не получается найти. Спасибо!
А Драйзеру это реально надо?
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение!
Анастасия, здравствуйте!
Расскажите, как лучше организовать быт в паре Есенин (ж) и Дон (м).
Как будто двух интуитом вообще мало
заботит бытовуха
В идеале так, чтобы М все делал и платил за все, а Вы кофе пили 😈
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение!
Добрый день!
Как люди выбирают профессию в наше время? Я Габен, хотела учиться на психолога, прошла ваше типирование, поняла что идея не из лучших, о чем в принципе догадывалась, потому что идея учиться мне нравилась, но я не представляла как я буду консультировать. Также мне дали совет, что с развитием ИИ и грядущими изменениями в мире, поступать на психолога смысла нет. К совету…
Не пользоваться станком раз в 2 дня, не иметь вросших волос и не обозревать кусты перед походом на пляж — бесценно 💙
❤48
Showing the 12 most recent of 80 posts we hold for @socionality. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 80 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 28 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Эволюция @evo_lutio · 59,354 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 22 August 2026
Vse_o_socionike @vse_o_socionike · 80,173 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 18 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Socionality” (@socionality), 9,911 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/socionality.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.