Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ¡Plus ultra! o algo así

Channel

¡Plus ultra! o algo así

@sociallyacceptablehulia

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

32subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003578992713
TypeChannel
Username@sociallyacceptablehulia
DescriptionЕсли вкратце, то 🇷🇺➡️🇪🇸
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/sociallyacceptablehulia

Growth

328 August 2026 — 32 subscribers11 August 2026 — 32 subscribers8 August 202611 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 3 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 31–33 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 02:3032no change
8 Aug 2026, 02:3632first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 26 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
109.8%
avg views ÷ 32 subscribers
Avg views / post
35.1
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
11.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 17 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held17 (26 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total246
Reactions total27
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Aug 2026, 02:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
135
Videos
12
Links
4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

56 reactions across 16 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🌭56100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 56reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 21:13 UTC26 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

на самом деле это такой флекс когда ты смотришь на фотку где ты в путешествии и не помнишь из какого из миллиона твоих country count мест эта фотка

🌭4

6 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC39 views5 reactionsread 11 August 2026

поступил вопрос про то, на каком языке я мыслю! всегда по разному. но обычно это смесь русского и английского. зачастую после, допустим, разговора или поглощения контента на испанском я могу у себя в мыслях потом долгое время болтать на испанском. тк мои мысли это в основном беспрерывный диалог+музыка 24/7, это отслеживается довольно просто. ииии естественно, музыка в голове звучит на том языке, на котором поёт испо

🌭5

6 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC35 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

без шуток, я даже щас уже плохо на русском выражаюсь, и мне как-то раз сказали, что у меня уже появляется акцент(((

🌭3

6 Aug 2026, 15:17 UTC31 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

страх детства номер 3893994: в погоне за знаниями выучить 10 языков, но в итоге не сдать ни 1 тест на язык, потеряв способность общаться и ясно выражаться из-за того, что в голове всплывает какой угодно язык, но не тот, на котором сейчас общаешься 🥹

🌭4

3 Aug 2026, 13:46 UTC40 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026

ситуация была такая: я: блин, дедлайн по арту на интервью с художником уже через 3 дня, а интервью по скайпу вообще не принимают, только лично... ладно щас напишу рандомышам в интернете, которые рисуют примерно так же как и я. рандомыши в интернете: *не отвечают* я: ну ладно, щас погуглю какие художники в Испании вообще есть. о, Рикардо Санс! он вроде королевскую семью рисовал. надо бы написать ему, попытать удачу т

🌭4

3 Aug 2026, 13:38 UTC33 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

кстати он мне ещё свою книжечку подарил :3 para Julia

🌭4

3 Aug 2026, 13:35 UTC42 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

привет стая, я совсем забыла вам сказать, что я в старшей школе брала интервью у королевского художника Испании! фанфакт обо мне

🌭3

30 Jul 2026, 11:26 UTC39 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

кстати если ты платишь налоги в Испании, то тебе будет скидос что ли 90% на все таблетки (конечно, надо там кучу всего оформить, но суть прежняя). ну например мои стоят 70 евро, а сегодня я заплатила 5. в России вроде такое же есть!!

🌭3

29 Jul 2026, 06:50 UTC46 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026

представьте, что вы японец и занимаетесь шрифтами японского для компов. и вот, вы уже типа кучу лет делаете 1 шрифт, потому что иероглифов в японском типа 50к (большинство из которых вообще не употребляется в письме, но их запечатлеть в шрифте всё равно надо, потому что А ВДРУГ), и вам чёта приходит запрос от вашего босса типа "сделай ещё призрачные кандзи. они ничё не означают, и никто ими на полном серьёзе не будет

🌭3

29 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC41 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

вот это вообще скорее всего опечатка, и это на самом деле 閏. просто братан зачем-то добавил ещё 1 черту, и теперь японисты со всего мира ломают голову что это значит. Я Ж ГОВОРЮ, ОНИ ПРИКОЛЬНЫЕ!!!!

🌭3

29 Jul 2026, 06:32 UTC33 views3 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

я обожаю призрачные кандзи. ну типа они такие прикольные и загадочные: они существуют, но никто не знает, что они означают или (зачастую) как они читаются. ну вот что это такое?? я хз ЛОЛ

🌭3

27 Jul 2026, 20:58 UTC37 views2 reactionsread 11 August 2026

если вы думаете что язык не формирует мышление и mindset человека, то ПОЖАЛУЙСТА НЕ КОНТАКТИРУЙТЕ СО МНОЙ. ведь давно известно, что если язык и или юмор построен на какой-то ненависти к другим группам людей, то, хотите вы этого или нет, ВЫ СТАНЕТЕ ИХ ПРЕЗИРАТЬ!!! оттого русские зачастую не любят небелых людей, потому что у нас в обиходе куча расистких анекдотов про соседние народы и тд и тп. то же самое происходит,

🌭2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @sociallyacceptablehulia. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 785,642 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“¡Plus ultra! o algo así” (@sociallyacceptablehulia), 32 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sociallyacceptablehulia.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.