Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SocialBuild

Channel

SocialBuild

@socialbuild

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

760subscribers

-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002169000279
TypeChannel
Username@socialbuild
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live23 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 23 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/socialbuild

Growth

760765762.57 August 2026 — 765 subscribers8 August 2026 — 765 subscribers15 August 2026 — 762 subscribers23 August 2026 — 760 subscribers7 August 202623 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 16 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 759–766 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
23 Aug 2026, 14:33760-2
15 Aug 2026, 02:57762-3
8 Aug 2026, 01:50765no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:36765first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 31 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

177 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍7944.6%
3922.0%
🎉3620.3%
🔥158.47%
❤‍🔥21.13%
🆒21.13%
🍾21.13%
10.565%
🤡10.565%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 177reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 13 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 18 we hold a reading for · 11%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @socialbuild. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 March 2025 to 13 July 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

13 Jul 2025, 18:17 UTC≈1,370 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Артур сделал большой образовательный ролик, ликбез откуда "все началось". 15 минут пролетели быстро и полезно лайк подписка 🌟

👍91

13 Jul 2025, 18:17 UTC≈1,440 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @monster_ECG

⚠️Друзья! Теперь видео доступно для всех, абсолютно бесплатно! 🤗Добро пожаловать! Жду ваших подписок, комментариев, лайков. Это мое первое видео такого формата. Если вам понравится, я буду делать еще 👌 https://youtu.be/FhP3REqPhok

👍115🔥2

8 Jun 2025, 11:25 UTC≈1,640 views16 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Второй эпизод нейроклиники на подходе, нейросеть учла предыдущий эпизод, должно стать интереснее

8👍5🆒2🤡1

29 May 2025, 04:19 UTC≈2,140 views39 reactions5 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня отмечаю день рождения, но решил порадовать не только себя, но и вас 🎉 QTc калькулятор обновился: теперь он сразу подскажет, как интерпретировать ваш результат (отдельно для мужчин и женщин). https://qtc-calculator.socialbuild.ru/

🎉24🔥12🍾21

4 May 2025, 16:47 UTC≈1,890 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Наш QTc‑калькулятор вышел в лидеры выдачи Яндекса! 🎉 Пользователи активно находят и используют наш инструмент и вдохновляют нас на новые улучшения. В новом обновлении появятся: - Возможность ввода RR‑интервала вместо ЧСС - Автоматическая оценка QTc с отметками «норма», «незначительное удлинение» и «выраженное удлинение», "укорочение" А что ещё вам бы пригодилось? Буду рад вашим идеям в 💬 комментариях 💬

23👍2

15 Apr 2025, 03:56 UTC≈1,630 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🧠 НейроКлиника: Искусственный случай — разбор кейса №1 Приведён разбор от ИИ без корректировки 📍 Вспоминаем: 52-летний мужчина пришёл с жалобами на ощущение тяжести в груди при ходьбе. Боль не острая, но настойчивая. Жалобы — стабильные, но нарастающие. Факторов риска хоть отбавляй: курит, гиподинамия, масса 98 кг при росте 178 см. --- 🔎 Что было загадано? Стабильная ишемическая болезнь сердца. Стенокардия напр

👍16🎉122

10 Apr 2025, 04:32 UTC≈1,150 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

📊 В этот раз ЭхоКГ и выставление диагноза набрали одинаковое количество голосов. 🩺 Протокол ЭхоКГ — второе изображение. Насколько хорошо нейросеть его придумала? Заключение является корректно сформулированным? Теперь осталось поставить пациенту диагноз и решить, что делать дальше. Буду очень рад вашим мнениям в комментариях. Я загружу ответы в нейросеть, а в следующем посте покажу итоговый разбор.

👍7

8 Apr 2025, 13:58 UTC≈5,790 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🫀 ИИ научился предсказывать смертельные аритмии за 2 недели до их появления Исследователи обучили нейросеть на 247 254 амбулаторных ЭКГ из шести стран. Алгоритм анализирует 24 часа записи и с высокой точностью предсказывает устойчивую желудочковую тахикардию на горизонте двух недель. При специфичности 97% чувствительность достигала до 70%. Модель особенно точно определяла тяжёлые случаи: 81% быстрых ЖТ (≥180 уд/мин

👍15

8 Apr 2025, 09:15 UTC836 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Какие дальнейшие действия?

  1. Выполнить ЭхоКГ36%
  2. Назначить анализы (биохимия, ОАК, коагулограмма, липиды)26%
  3. Провести УЗДГ сосудов шеи3%
  4. Достаточно, уже все понятно, можно ставить диагноз и начинать лечение36%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

8 Apr 2025, 09:14 UTC877 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Протокол тредмил-теста 1. Условия проведения - Мониторинг: • 12-канальная ЭКГ • АД каждые 3 минуты 2. Исходные данные - АД: 135/80 мм рт.ст. - ЧСС: 72 уд/мин - ЭКГ: синусовый ритм, без ишемических изменений 3. Результаты На изображении 4. Заключение - Положительная нагрузочная проба

8 Apr 2025, 09:13 UTC767 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нейросеть никак не согласилась правильно расположить электроды на рисунке 🗣 Вариант с тестом на физическую нагрузку пациента набрал наибольшее количество голосов и он отправился на тредмил-тест

7 Apr 2025, 09:51 UTC815 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

🩺 Что вы сделаете дальше?

  1. Назначить лабораторные анализы (липиды, биохимия, ОАК)11%
  2. Назначить суточное мониторирование ЭКГ16%
  3. Провести физикальный осмотр28%
  4. Попросить пациента поприседать в кабинете2%
  5. Направить пациента на пробу с физической нагрузкой (тредмил, велоэргометрия)43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @socialbuild. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The 4 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Apr 2025, 09:15 UTCFinal Results76 voters

Какие дальнейшие действия?

  1. Выполнить ЭхоКГ36%
  2. Назначить анализы (биохимия, ОАК, коагулограмма, липиды)26%
  3. Провести УЗДГ сосудов шеи3%
  4. Достаточно, уже все понятно, можно ставить диагноз и начинать лечение36%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

7 Apr 2025, 09:51 UTCFinal Results90 voters

🩺 Что вы сделаете дальше?

  1. Назначить лабораторные анализы (липиды, биохимия, ОАК)11%
  2. Назначить суточное мониторирование ЭКГ16%
  3. Провести физикальный осмотр28%
  4. Попросить пациента поприседать в кабинете2%
  5. Направить пациента на пробу с физической нагрузкой (тредмил, велоэргометрия)43%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

6 Apr 2025, 09:27 UTCAnonymous Poll164 voters

Что делаем дальше?

  1. Опросить пациента48%
  2. Назначить лабораторные анализы: липидный профиль, глюкоза, креатинин29%
  3. Провести осмотр22%
  4. Отправить пациента домой с наблюдением и дневником симптомов1%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5 Apr 2025, 13:32 UTCFinal Results125 voters

Какие дальнейшие действия?

  1. Направить на ЭКГ58%
  2. Провести физикальный осмотр9%
  3. Продолжить опрос пациента34%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 31 March 2025 to 13 July 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SocialBuild” (@socialbuild), 760 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/socialbuild.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.