Channel
@soc_club
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
129subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001782933066 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @soc_club |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/soc_club |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 16:46 | 129 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:01 | 130 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 08:36 | 130 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 June 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 17 |
| Reactions total | 2 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 01:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
21 reactions across 7 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 10 | 47.6% | |
| 🥰 | 5 | 23.8% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🦄 | 2 | 9.52% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 4.76% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 June 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Завтра последняя апелляция 25/26, и чуть больше месяца до нового учебного. Я жду встречи с теми, кому сдавать ЕГЭ по обществу. При сохранении нынешнего формата могу показать как надо и не надо формулировать ответы. А что предстоит вам? ♥️Я ученик, собираюсь в 27 сдавать ЕГЭ по обществу 🥰Я родитель школьника ✍️Я учитель/преподаватель 🔥Я студент ❤️🔥Я работник, предприниматель, тружусь,в общем 🦄Я по жизни отдыхаю
❤1🔥1
Популярность для пересдачи подпитана, на мой взгляд, тем же непониманием первопричины неудачи первой попытки. При кажущейся простоте предмета огромное содержание, конструкции заданий и нюансы формулировок делают своё тёмное дело. Практика показывает,что даже сильному ученику нужен проводник в прекрасный мир этого предмета
⬆️ По этой причине общество много лет было самым популярным из необязательных ЕГЭ
Потому что думают, что могут "заболтать" и учить не надо.
Завтра пересдают, а нам в пятницу проверять. Как думаете, почему самый популярный?
https://tass.ru/obschestvo/27896073
А слова в посте я выделила те, которые пригодятся готовящимся к экзамену по обществу
Хотелось бы "я в домике", но статус взрослой тётеньки, да к тому же собственницы, обязывал. Папку с документами в ночи собрала. Ну, а как? Разве до сна было, когда в личном кабинете увидела 6 тысяч к оплате за воду, которую я не потребляла! Годами показания принимали по электронной почте, в квитанциях указывали 0₽. А тут... Да, знаю я,что за 3 месяца отсутствия показаний начисляют по нормативам, помноженным на коли…
Дорогие подписчики, а вы бы пошли на пересдачу ЕГЭ? Через неделю-две после выпускного. 1й балл аннулируется, останется только 2й 🔥Да, надо пользоваться ✍️Шило на мыло нет смысла менять 🦄Как хорошо,что не пришлось выбирать Или больше,чем одним эмодзи, напишите в комментариях 😉
🦄2
Одна настойчивая девушка, пыталась убедить меня,что медицина и медицинская помощь (в контексте задания 23 ЕГЭ, право на <...>) равнозначны. Потом стала всматриваться в мои записи, вопрошая: - Ну кому-то же вы дали баллы! -Нет, не дала. Вам добавлю: -За одно задание добавила балл, но сняла за другое в той же работе. Авторы сильных работ обычно видят +/- их оценивания и с умом подходят к возможности апеллировать. Та…
❤1
- А вы рекомендуете идти на пересдачу? Тот, кто не преодолел порог, ничего не теряет. Не сдал, потому как не освоил предмет. Легко завалит его на второй попытке. Тут и парой консультаций не спастись. Высокобалльник. Но хочет в вуз мечты, бесплатное общежитие, скидку на обучение, удовлетворения амбиций. Есть смысл рискнуть. Вчерашний вопрос мне задал владелец 73 баллов. Проанализировали результаты. Прошлись по "пот…
🔥1
Что будет с ЕГЭ по обществу в 2027? Ответ от секретаря группы разработчиков новой линейки учебников
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @soc_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПРО общество” (@soc_club), 129 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soc_club.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.