3 measurements spanning 9 days, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 940–941 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 03:16
941
+1
6 Aug 2026, 13:51
940
no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:15
940
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 16 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
219 reactions across 8 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🙏
85
38.8%
❤
52
23.7%
🔥
37
16.9%
👍
21
9.59%
❤🔥
12
5.48%
🥰
5
2.28%
👏
2
0.913%
💯
2
0.913%
🤩
2
0.913%
🏆
1
0.457%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 219reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 13 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
‼️Друзья, регистрация на Собор РОСХВЕ(п) 2026 открыта!
📌Тема Собора — «Достойный делатель». Это призыв к глубокому осмыслению своего служения и достижению в нём качественно иного уровня.
📌Приглашаем пасторов, лидеров и всех активных верующих для усиления своего служения в следующих направлениях:
🔹 поколения;
🔹 социальная архитектура;
🔹 обеспечение деятельности;
🔹 внешние коммуникации;
🔹 душепопечительство;
🔹 миссио…
🙏1 МАРТА — ЕДИНЫЙ ДЕНЬ МОЛИТВЫ
Начальствующий епископ РОСХВЕ(п) Сергей Ряховский призывает верующих Союза на богослужениях 1 марта объединиться в молитве:
🔗за законодателей;
🔗за отклонение законопроекта или его фундаментальную переработку с участием представителей религиозных общин;
🔗за сохранение мира и согласия в нашем Отечестве.
Смотреть видео📎
Напоминаем, что 13 февраля 2026 года в Госдуму был внесён законопро…
🚨ВЫСТУПИТЕ В ЗАЩИТУ СВОЕЙ ВЕРЫ
Друзья, в Государственную Думу внесён законопроект № 1149587-8, который может кардинально изменить деятельность церквей.
Под ударом оказываются:
🔗Все конфессии, практикующие собрания на дому
🔗Малочисленные общины без собственных зданий или с недостатком средств для аренды
🔗Домашние группы и проводимые на дому семейные молитвы, причастие, отпевание с участием родственников и др.
Докум…
🔻Сюжет о Соборе РОСХВЕ(п) 2025
Друзья, команда Информбюро «Спектр» подготовила сюжет, в котором собраны ключевые моменты нашего главного ежегодного события — Собора РОСХВЕ(п). Скорее смотрите сюжет по ссылкам:
💙RUTUBE
📱VK Видео
#росхве #собор #собор2025
Новые фото с Собора✨
📸Друзья, отправляем вам кадры от Алексея и Ларисы Сыркиных
⠀
📎Скачивайте фото и делитесь воспоминаниями о Соборе в своих соцсетях
⠀
#росхве #собор #собор2025
⚡️Вы ждали, мы делали все возможное! Фотографии с Собора начинают поступать.
📸Первая партия от Дениса Хуторецкого @DenisKhutoretskiy.
▶️Смотрите, наслаждайтесь и делитесь незабываемыми моментами встречи!
СОБОР РОСХВЕ(п) 2025 | ДОБРЫЙ ПОДВИГ ВЕРЫ
Главное событие года собрало 650 человек из 116 городов России. Участники говорили о современниках-героях, совершающих добрые подвиги веры — о тех, кто, несмотря на давление и испытания, остаётся верен Христу.
Также епископы, пасторы и лидеры служений получили духовное и профессиональное снаряжение, участвуя в работе 7 тематических потоков.
Читать подробности📎
📎СОБОР РОСХ…
Опишите ваши впечатления от Собора (можно выбрать НЕСКОЛЬКО вариантов)
Лучший32%
Хороший54%
Обычный4%
Сомнительный0%
Продуктивный46%
Проактивный11%
Информативный38%
Трудно сказать1%
Ответ напишу в комментариях0%
The shares total 186%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что для вас было интересно на Соборе? (можно выбрать НЕСКОЛЬКО вариантов)
Открытие Собора50%
Вечер хвалы и поклонения52%
Встреча с друзьями50%
Работа в потоках73%
Встреча женского сообщества «Созидай»22%
Панельная дискуссия27%
Презентация Энциклопедии протестантизма16%
Подкаст «ПроИмидж»12%
Проповеди32%
Ответ напишу в комментариях1%
The shares total 335%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
❤5
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @soborcef. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Опишите ваши впечатления от Собора (можно выбрать НЕСКОЛЬКО вариантов)
Лучший32%
Хороший54%
Обычный4%
Сомнительный0%
Продуктивный46%
Проактивный11%
Информативный38%
Трудно сказать1%
Ответ напишу в комментариях0%
The shares total 186%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Что для вас было интересно на Соборе? (можно выбрать НЕСКОЛЬКО вариантов)
Открытие Собора50%
Вечер хвалы и поклонения52%
Встреча с друзьями50%
Работа в потоках73%
Встреча женского сообщества «Созидай»22%
Панельная дискуссия27%
Презентация Энциклопедии протестантизма16%
Подкаст «ПроИмидж»12%
Проповеди32%
Ответ напишу в комментариях1%
The shares total 335%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Была ли по вашему мнению раскрыта главная тема Собора «Добрый подвиг веры»
Да77%
Нет3%
Сложно сказать20%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 16 October 2025 to 13 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,027,891 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Психология @psyxo1 · 116,413 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 14 August 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СОБОР РОСХВЕ 2026” (@soborcef), 941 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/soborcef.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.