Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

SOBOL

@sobolabouttrading

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

3,058subscribers

+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002332700355
TypeChannel
Username@sobolabouttrading
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sobolabouttrading

Growth

3,0443,0583,0517 August 2026 — 3,044 subscribers8 August 2026 — 3,055 subscribers11 August 2026 — 3,058 subscribers7 August 202611 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +14. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,042–3,060 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 07:533,058+3
8 Aug 2026, 11:343,055+11
7 Aug 2026, 14:333,044first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
66.9%
avg views ÷ 3,058 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,040
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.01%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held20 (29 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total40,890
Reactions total823
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 00:09 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 20s
Average length
9m 20s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

823 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42952.1%
🔥15018.2%
👍10512.8%
🤝576.93%
🍌414.98%
👏202.43%
❤‍🔥182.19%
🆒30.365%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 823reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 12:53 UTC≈1,200 views27 reactionsread 8 August 2026

https://www.tradingview.com/x/lwNhaKZf/ - по итогу такая позиция вышла по евро, закрыл еще вчера. Сегодня уже ничего по нему не предпринимал.

19👍8

7 Aug 2026, 12:52 UTC≈1,220 views15 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Отчет по NFP вышел смешанным. NFP: -23 тыс. (ожидали +85 тыс.) - экономика потеряла рабочие места. Безработица: 4,1% (ожидали 4,2%) - немного снизилась. Главный негатив - слабый NFP, что усиливает ожидания смягчения политики ФРС. На фоне этого доллар ослабевает, что усилило евро и другие активы.

15

7 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC≈1,420 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026

EUR: https://www.tradingview.com/x/pdgM7Lc2/ - было бы интересно получить реакцию от 4H FVG и прийти к выделенному SSL. Возможно во время NFP данный план реализуется. Зависит от релиза.

👍264

6 Aug 2026, 11:43 UTC≈1,630 views36 reactionsread 8 August 2026

NASDAQ: https://www.tradingview.com/x/rSQkOm2s/ - хочу получить продолжение лонгов после тестирования daily FVG и FVL.

32❤‍🔥2👍2

5 Aug 2026, 19:01 UTC≈1,790 views47 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Евро доехало: https://www.tradingview.com/x/kMtkUglI/

27👍11🤝7❤‍🔥2

5 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC≈1,760 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Разбор позиций 03.08-05.08

18🔥10👏5

5 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,750 views54 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

36👍11👏7

5 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,710 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

И вечером разбор позиций от меня, как обещал

🔥142

5 Aug 2026, 08:14 UTC≈1,760 views108 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Делаем сегодня видеообзор позиций за эту неделю?

70🔥23👍13🤝1🆒1

4 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,850 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Завтра в работу!

🤝257👍3

4 Aug 2026, 18:27 UTC≈1,850 views42 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🤝18🔥109👍3👏2

2 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC≈2,160 views60 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🔥4211🍌7

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sobolabouttrading. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 290,863 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SOBOL” (@sobolabouttrading), 3,058 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sobolabouttrading.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.