جدای از هر چیزی من بیشتر این وسواس کلاد رو دوس دارم که خودش همه چیو تست میکنه تا زمانی که مطمئن نشه اوکیه ، خروجی رو بهت نمیده
🔥8👍1

Channel
@sobitoai
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
696subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003158146891 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sobitoai |
| Created | Between 1 September 2025 and 30 November 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 8 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 8 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sobitoai |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 8 Aug 2026, 11:06 | 696 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 | 694 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:35 | 694 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (30 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,850 |
| Reactions total | 231 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 02:20 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
231 reactions across 20 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 148 | 64.1% | |
| 👍 | 50 | 21.6% | |
| 🔥 | 24 | 10.4% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 3.03% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 0.433% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 0.433% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 231reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
جدای از هر چیزی من بیشتر این وسواس کلاد رو دوس دارم که خودش همه چیو تست میکنه تا زمانی که مطمئن نشه اوکیه ، خروجی رو بهت نمیده
🔥8👍1
یه بزرگواری یه سایت بهم معرفی کرد که از طریقش میتونیم به مدلای کلاد دسترسی داشته باشیم و من باهاش پروژه ای رو استارت زدم که 2 ساعت داشت روی این پروژه کار میکرد (هنوزم خیلی کار داره) و فقط یه کردیت ازم کم کرد اگه هوشمندانه از این سایت استفاده کنید میتونید بزرگ ترین پروژه هاتون رو باهاش انجام بدید. معرفیش کنیم؟ یه چیزی شبیه به همون نوشن ولی با محدودیت کردیت که اگه بدونید باهاش چجوری رفتار کنید میتونید تا حدودی مدیریت ک…
👍17❤1
برای بعضی ها که اکانت رایگان دارن قابلیت ساخت 10 ویدیو در هفته با مدل omni در سایت جمنای اضافه شده از تمامی کردیت هایی که بهتون رایگان داده میشه استفاده کنید از اینم استفاده کنید👇🏻 سایت
👍2🔥1
همونجور که تو ویدیو امروز دیدید اگه اکانت pro داشته باشید دستتون باز تره برای تولید ویدیو نامحدود از مدلای گوگل اگه اکانت pro هم نداشته باشید بازم میتونید استفاده کنید و مشکلی نداره با این حال اگه کسی اکانت pro خواست تهیه کنه بهترین و مناسب ترین اینجاست حتما اعلام کنید که از طرف کانال sobito ai برای خرید رفتید که با قیمت 540 بهتون بدن
🔥6❤1
🔥 چرا بیشتر هزینه کنید؟! اکانت Gemini Pro که بعضی جاها با قیمتهای چند میلیونی ارائه میشود، اینجا با قیمت ویژه در دسترس شماست! 🚀 ✅ اکانت اختصاصی Gemini Pro ✅ دسترسی به مدلهای قدرتمند هوش مصنوعی گوگل ✅ تولید محتوا، تحلیل فایل، تصویر و کدنویسی ✅ ابزارهای پیشرفته تحقیق و هوش مصنوعی ✅ فعالسازی سریع و مطمئن 💎 قیمت ویژه: فقط 560 هزار تومان یعنی دسترسی به امکانات یک سرویس حرفهای، با هزینهای کمتر از نیم میلیون تومان! ⚠️…
❤4
اپلیکیشن مال من نیست دوستان اینو من پیدا کردم بهتون معرفی کردم هیچ سودی برا من نداره ازش استفاده کنید اگه براتون کار نمیکنه پشتیبانی رباتش پیام بدید
❤7
خودتون بشمارید ببینید چه تعداد ویدیو با gemini omni flahs ساختم بدون اینکه حتی 1 کردیت ازم کم کنه کسایی که ویدیو رو دیدن متوجه هستن که کردیت هام تغییری نکرده اگه ویدیو رو ندیدی حتما همین الان ببین ویدیو رو هم کامل ببین همه چیشو بفهمی خودتو گمراه نکنی بعد تو کامنت یا دایرکت در جست و جو جواب باشی لینک ویدیو: https://youtu.be/kPFnUzJgeBE
🔥6❤2😱1
🚨 گرونترین مدل ویدیوسازی دنیا، حالا فقط 35 هزار تومن! Seedance 2 Pro همون مدلیه که ویدیوهای سینمایی و واقعگرایانهش همهجا وایرال شده. مشکل؟ هر جای دیگه بخوای با این مدل ویدیو بسازی، باید میلیونی هزینه کنی 💸 ما قیمتش رو شکستیم 👇 🎬 هر ویدیو با Seedance 2 Pro = فقط 35000 تومان ✅ کیفیت سینمایی، حرکت طبیعی دوربین، جزئیات واقعی ✅ تبدیل متن به ویدیو و عکس به ویدیو ✅ بدون تحریم، بدون کارت ارزی ✅ چند ثانیه کار داره، نه …
❤7
روش دسترسی نامحدود به مدلای تولید ویدیو گوگل رو فردا ویدیوش منتشر میکنم حتما ببینید ازش استفاده کنید تا میتونید ویدیو درست کنید تا زمانی که هست فردا ساعت 12
❤16👍2
اپدیت سایت genspark دوستانی گفتن که ما باهاش کار کردیم کردیت کم کرده ببیند بهش لینک ندید بره لینک رو بررسی کنه تسک انجام بده مثلا تحلیل ویدیو یوتیوب اینو بهش بدید همون اول چون ابزاری رو فراخوانی میکنه کردیتش کم میکنه مورد بعدی اگه میخوایید ویدیویی بهش بدید تحللیل کنه یا از یه ویدیو استفاده کنید اسکریپت اون ویدیو رو از یه مدل دیگه بگیرید بهش بدید بیشتر برای موارد برنامه نویسی ازش استفاده کنید کردیت کم نمیکنه نیاز نیست…
❤8
بخش مربوط به تکنیک نامحدود کردن کردیت https://youtu.be/eWkV7uI2RJg
❤17👏3👍1
فایل تکنیک رو سریع تر میذارم اون دوستانی هم که ویدیو رو ندیدن لینکش اینجاست👇🏻 https://youtu.be/eWkV7uI2RJg
❤15👏2🤯1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sobitoai. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 148,844 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sobitoai” (@sobitoai), 696 subscribers as measured 8 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sobitoai.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.