Channel
@sobigmark
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
483subscribers
-21 since we began measuring on 2 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002996412434 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sobigmark |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 2 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 22 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 22 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sobigmark |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 28 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:10 | 483 | -1 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:46 | 484 | +1 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 483 | -10 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 493 | -9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 12:18 | 502 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:58 | 506 | +2 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:15 | 504 | no change |
| 2 Sept 2026, 19:02 | 504 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 31 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 11 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
61 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😈 | 15 | 24.6% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 23.0% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 13.1% | |
| 😍 | 8 | 13.1% | |
| 🔥 | 6 | 9.84% | |
| 👍 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 🦄 | 4 | 6.56% | |
| 🍓 | 1 | 1.64% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.64% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 31 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
если буквально месяц назад он топил мишу и всех с им связанных, мол они педофилы пидарасы и хуевые люди, то ща он решил встать на сторону большинства (тех самых педофилов пидарасов и хуевых людей «не мои слова») и хуесосить меньшинство
❤1
бля я в позитивном пандусе заметил, что любой конфликт, будь то с мишей или владосом, он делает на это миллиард постов. вот как ща, каждый пост влада он реплит к себе и отвечает на него. он либо прост тупой, либо пытается жеско подсосать трафик
❤1
вот бы ща сырных шариков с брусничным соусом, а не конфликты 😎
😈7
рандом с августа нахуякайте рякций и мб как раньше проведу интерактивчек какойтнить
❤12💘7🔥3🍓1🥰1
но движуха имеет место быть
😈3
не хочу особо читать об этом конфликте, я слишком люблю позитивные вайбы
😈3
честна я ваще не конфликтный, но, с сообщений некоторых kekau, so so… не хочу както сильно высказываться, послушал буквально всех на кого подписан, и там и там есть своя правда и итам итам есть гавно. как и говорил, херня высосанная из пальца, ктото б рано или поздно все выложил как седня, это должно было произойти. типа то что влад ебанулся давно знают все, хз че на него все так накинулись. первый час конфликтов бы…
👍4😈2
бл че б высрать
💘1
💬 У тебя новое анонимное сообщение! ты за кого в 100 проц не фейк бифе
какие нахуй конфликты. 33 августа через 2 часа 🧐
😍8🦄4
в наличии воть ето все добришко
🔥3
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @sobigmark. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 22 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“😋 краМ йынлоП” (@sobigmark), 483 subscribers as measured 22 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sobigmark.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.