Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Собесы и кекесы

@sobeskekes

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

207subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003084616304
TypeChannel
Username@sobeskekes
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sobeskekes

Growth

207208207.57 August 2026 — 208 subscribers8 August 2026 — 208 subscribers14 August 2026 — 207 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 207–208 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 20:46207-1
8 Aug 2026, 11:05208no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:44208first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 3 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 15s
Average length
3m 15s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

63 reactions across 11 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁2742.9%
🔥2031.7%
711.1%
🤣34.76%
🗿23.17%
👍11.59%
🙏11.59%
🤡11.59%
🥰11.59%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 63reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 17 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Jun 2026, 21:14 UTC227 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Немного о том, как не надо вести деловую коммуникацию. Чувак хочет чего-то от меня, но чтобы понять, что он хочет, мне нужно приложить кучу усилий. Не делайте так - лучше сразу в первом сообщении опишите, что вам нужно от собеседника.

🙏1

16 Jun 2026, 15:44 UTC397 views5 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Нейрослоповый мир победил...

5

6 Jun 2026, 10:11 UTC346 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как у вас сейчас дела с работой?

  1. Я работаю на нескольких работах9%
  2. Я работаю на одной работе68%
  3. Меня уволили/сократили, пока не нашел работу15%
  4. Я никогда и не работал8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jun 2026, 10:37 UTC306 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Ты смотришь рейтинги компаний при выборе нового места работы?

  1. Да15%
  2. Нет60%
  3. Хочу смотреть рейтинги, читать отзывы и всё такое, но выберу первый попавшийся оффер26%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jun 2026, 10:35 UTC279 viewsread 8 August 2026

Чуваки, а кто-то вообще при выборе места работы опирается на эти премии? Они же очевидно проплаченные, по сути, компании меряются бюджетами.

3 Jun 2026, 08:39 UTC272 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @luka_ebkovPhoto

Так, ну что, доставайте попкорн: выкатили обещанное расследование про главную HR-премию страны от HeadHunter. Ее хваленую систему методично вскрыли и представили на суд всему рынку. Как это началось. Ребят с рынка взбесило, во-первых, что их компании постоянно проигрывают в рейтинге работодателей HH.ru конкурентам с гораздо более худшими показателями. Во-вторых, что многие из последних выходят в топ через накрутку и

🤣3🗿2🔥1

22 May 2026, 14:59 UTC378 views3 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Мне тоже несколько человек скинули эту новость, хотел писать пост, но его вместо меня написал буквально Антон Назаров. Антону респект. В целом, самый забавный момент в том, что Bolt не избавился от HRов, а заменил на то, что называется PeopleOps, Грубо говоря вместо массовичков-затейников, с метриками типа вовлеченности и удовлетворенности, персоналом стали заниматься люди с финансовыми метриками и прочей оперэффект

2👍1

8 May 2026, 07:11 UTC504 views9 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Кто слил тестовое, признавайтесь?!

😁8🥰1

7 May 2026, 09:39 UTC443 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Запоминайте, ребята.

😁2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sobeskekes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Jun 2026, 10:11 UTCAnonymous Poll96 voters

Как у вас сейчас дела с работой?

  1. Я работаю на нескольких работах9%
  2. Я работаю на одной работе68%
  3. Меня уволили/сократили, пока не нашел работу15%
  4. Я никогда и не работал8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jun 2026, 10:37 UTCAnonymous Poll62 voters

Ты смотришь рейтинги компаний при выборе нового места работы?

  1. Да15%
  2. Нет60%
  3. Хочу смотреть рейтинги, читать отзывы и всё такое, но выберу первый попавшийся оффер26%

Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 3 May 2026 to 17 June 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Собесы и кекесы” (@sobeskekes), 207 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sobeskekes.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.