水水今日ootd
Channel
水水
@snnejcn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
6subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1004475014070 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @snnejcn |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 26 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/snnejcn |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:16 | 6 | no change |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:02 | 6 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 2306.1%
- avg views ÷ 6 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 138
- 19 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 19
- of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 19 (26 July 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 2,629 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 23:16 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 3
- Videos
- 27
- Links
- 4
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 2m 55s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 17 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
水水今日ootd
水水ootd
水水今日ootd
Video, posted without a caption
水水今日份ootd
水水好评➕1
推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️ 【女仆花名】: 水水 【年龄】:18 【身高】:163 【体重】:85 【凶器】:B 【体验日期】:2026.8.7 【报告人】:达不溜 【店铺 】: 流星雨 【地区 】:西湖 【价格】:599/h 【联系方式】: 客服小八 【服务环境】:双人床房间 女仆评测:❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 【人照相似度】:9分 【六维-颜值扮相】:9分 【六维-配合素养】:10分 【六维-情绪价值】:10分 【六维-身段皮肤】:10分 【六维-胸臀性感】:9分 【六维-服务尺度】:标大拉满 体验感受:从拼好饭/养乐多时期就一直想点水水,可惜都没如愿,看到最近回归,晚上刚好在附近吃饭,因为晚上喝了些酒提前让客服问了妹妹介不介意,妹妹表示没问题,便欣然前往。进房间没一会妹妹就推门进来了,乍看些许惊艳。一席紧身的红色长裙,身姿曼妙,少女感十足。虽然已是凌晨12点半了面容依旧精致,比模卡更好看。进门热情打招呼,主动…
水水今日份ootd
Video, posted without a caption
推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️』 【女仆花名】: 水水 【年龄】:18 【身高】:163 【体重】:85 【凶器】:B 【体验日期】:2026.8.6 【报告人】:broken 【店铺 】: 流星雨 【地区 】:西湖 【价格】:599/h 【联系方式】: 客服小八 【服务环境】:双人床房间 女仆评测:❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 【人照相似度】:8.5分 【六维-颜值扮相】:9分 【六维-配合素养】:10分 【六维-情绪价值】:9分 【六维-身段皮肤】:9分 【六维-胸臀性感】:8分 【六维-服务尺度】:标大 体验感受:今天体验了水水,妹妹白羊座,今年4月才成年,之前好像是这家店的满姐,这次见到果然名不虚传。颜值身材都是9分妹以上水准,妹妹穿着一身薄纱红袍,旖旎盘旋着身子就上来,主动湿润的舌吻让人欲罢不能,随后就是标大以上应有尽有的缠绵,妹妹皮肤超好,各种挑逗都特别阵细腻触动敏感的神经。操作一通后一起休息聊天,得知妹妹广东…
推荐指数:⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️⭐️』 【女仆花名】: 水水 【年龄】:18 【身高】:163 【体重】:85 【凶器】:B 【体验日期】:2026.8.6 【报告人】:Georgee 【店铺 】: 流星雨 【地区 】:西湖 【价格】:599/h 【联系方式】: 客服小八 【服务环境】:双人床房间 女仆评测:❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️❤️ 【人照相似度】:8.5分 【六维-颜值扮相】:9分 【六维-配合素养】:10分 【六维-情绪价值】:9分 【六维-身段皮肤】:9分 【六维-胸臀性感】:8分 【六维-服务尺度】:标大 体验感受:流星雨的服务还是很好的 客服下楼接 然后把妹妹带进房间 就看到水水从旁边闪现出来 直接就被控住了 赶紧把客服推出去抱着水水进房间 妹妹今年才18 穿搭和妆造都很用心 眼妆画的特别好看 第一眼见到以为是江南水乡的长大的女孩子 结果得知是广东的 水水的态度真的很好 哥哥长哥哥短的叫着 回答问题都是要简单思…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @snnejcn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 735,627 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“水水” (@snnejcn), 6 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snnejcn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.