10 measurements spanning 22 days, net -45. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,779–4,838 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Aug 2026, 17:38
4,786
-8
26 Aug 2026, 03:34
4,794
-7
23 Aug 2026, 04:45
4,801
-3
19 Aug 2026, 15:23
4,804
-6
16 Aug 2026, 20:44
4,810
-6
13 Aug 2026, 15:27
4,816
-6
10 Aug 2026, 11:10
4,822
-8
7 Aug 2026, 14:36
4,830
-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:15
4,831
no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:05
4,831
first reading
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 27 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.9%
avg views ÷ 4,786 subscribers
Avg views / post
856
4 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
4
of 16 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 4 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
16 (27 May 2026 – 11 August 2026)
Views total
3,425
Reactions total
124
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
1,200 reactions across 13 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 35.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤🔥
422
35.2%
🔥
385
32.1%
😁
82
6.83%
custom 5382003319386420581
57
4.75%
💔
46
3.83%
😍
42
3.50%
✍
38
3.17%
custom 5382057934190556040
30
2.50%
💯
27
2.25%
🤝
22
1.83%
custom 5382153690486421713
16
1.33%
custom 5379939600485595817
13
1.08%
💅
12
1.00%
😨
7
0.583%
custom 5382331145650190448
1
0.083%
Custom emoji. 5 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,200reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 15 we hold a reading for · 20%
Most on one post
14
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @snezone_pub. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Итак, два бренда
Корейский (уход) и … Белорусский (декоративка)!
Начнем с корейского (vtcosmetics искать в соцсетях)
Две штучки наверху, гидрофильный бальзам с безумно удобной системой дозатора, которая защищает от воды и гигиеничнее чем пальцами в банку лезть или лопаткой, кто пользуется гидрофильными - рекомендую!! Не сушит, круто очищает 💔
Справа крем SOS для локальных проблем, есть покраснение, прыщики - лок…
Ну до чего удачно я постригла челку, сама!!
Вдохновилась своим подростком 😄
У меня подкопилась парочка бьюти рекомендаций (потрясающие находки!), если надо дайте знать! ❤️
Потестируйте веб sudbomat.ru
Первые гадания бесплатные
Что внутри?
Мы в нейронку добавили базу традиционных толкований и данные по нумерологии, гороскопам, то есть выдача предсказания будет не потоковыми фразами, а реально с опорой на толкования
Потестируйте дайте фидбек в комментах ✍🏼
Экономика идеи Судьбомат
• аренда под ивенты
• постоянная установка в развлекательные локации: рестораны, бары, клубы, ТЦ, кинотеатры
Кто-то в комментах предложил размещение в пятерочке, я с этим не соглашусь, думаю аудитория пятерочки в основном это рациональные покупатели, которым важны цены и развлекательный мотив там минимален, в отличие от перечисленных мной локаций
Экономика:
Цена гаданий от 100 до 350₽
10 …
Судьбомат.
Автомат предсказаний и гаданий: от таро до кельтских рун
Как будет работать: выбираешь гадание, выставляешь дату рождения, задаешь вопрос и вытягиваешь карты, получаешь персональный свиток напечатанный на термоленте с предсказанием
Немного фактов:
Рынок эзотерики в Росси оценивается в 2,4 триллиона, растет на 20-30% в год
Но автомат это не эзотерика, это развлекательный формат для ивентов: от свадеб д…
Иногда я думаю, что похожа на сумасшедшего шляпочника со своими бизнес идеями, их очень много и не все они доходят даже до расчетов, но те что доходят и как-то реализуются в мире, хотя бы в виде поста.. их тоже много и честно сказать я сдерживаю себя, фильтрую, не делюсь, чтобы не создать вот это вот ощущение что у меня двинулась крыша
А потом вспоминаю две вещи:
1. У Оскара Хартмана прогорело 43 бизнеса, запущено …
Бизнес идея: деревенский вайб
Вот не могу, нравится мне она и все! Но нужна тут команда и инвесторы 😀
В инсте полный пост сделала, а сюда выношу слайды
Я даже с юристом уже общалась по поводу формы, участников и долей, как это грамотно оформлять и рассчитывать
В чем суть: делать фонд управления загородной недвижимостью, покупать дешево, апгрейдить, сдавать и параллельно продавать
Участников может быть сотни и ты…
Upd: запрос закрыт
Есть тут налоговые консультанты? Напишите пожалуйста в лс, есть запрос на консультацию по нашему новому методу оплату в кошельке
Конкретно напишу в лс, в общих чертах: корректный учет ндс и отчетные доки какие
@snezone
За консультацию напишите пожалуйста сумму, когда в лс напишите ❤️
Самое вайбовое и при этом недорогое приобретение в новый дом это умная лампочка RGB
Цвета любые можно устанавливать, НЕ обязательно иметь колонку Алису, лампочки работают от приложения производителя
Купила одну на пробу, в итоге установила их во все светильники гостиной 😂
Торшер
Люстра
Ночник
У меня такие Е27 (стандартный цоколь для люстры и торшера) и такие Е14 (ночник с узким цоколем)
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @snezone_pub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published, totalling 98%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 27 May 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“snezone | предприниматель” (@snezone_pub), 4,786 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snezone_pub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.