Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Баюша, не иначе

Channel

Баюша, не иначе

@snezha_mrr

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,498subscribers

+12 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001489598013
TypeChannel
Username@snezha_mrr
DescriptionТут можно найти все ссылочки или кинуть донат вне стрима - https://dalink.to/snezhik_kus ❄️ 🎣 Ленивые песенки - #Баюша_для_сна 🎣 Подборки игр - #Во_что_играет_Баюша
CreatedBetween 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/snezha_mrr

Growth

9,4869,4989,4927 August 2026 — 9,486 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,486 subscribers7 August 2026 — 9,487 subscribers10 August 2026 — 9,494 subscribers13 August 2026 — 9,498 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +12. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,484–9,500 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 02:289,498+4
10 Aug 2026, 03:329,494+7
7 Aug 2026, 04:359,487+1
7 Aug 2026, 01:159,486no change
7 Aug 2026, 01:039,486first reading

Engagement

107 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.76%
avg views ÷ 9,498 subscribers
Avg views / post
642
107 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.36%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
107
of 107 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held107 (5 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total68,721
Reactions total5,745
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 20:57 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
14,200
Videos
1,170
Links
950

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 20s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

5,745 reactions across 106 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 51928331641663346962,36641.2%
custom 51926631521808911291,05018.3%
custom 51949820307938063921,03518.0%
custom 519494390007415185276513.3%
custom 51953794527076390694157.22%
custom 52354534045447953721141.98%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 107 of the 107 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,745reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 107 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
52
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 107 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @snezha_mrr. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 107 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC185 views37 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Я щас чуть не умерла Легла спать, а в комнате шкаф за трещал так сильно, будто там попадало что-то глухо, ну нафиг, сегодня сплю со Светом

custom 519283316416633469625custom 51949439000741518526custom 51949820307938063925custom 51926631521808911291

15 Aug 2026, 19:55 UTC251 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Я опять насмотрелась ужастиков и боюсь спать без света….🐸 но мне надо поспать немного ведь я скоро уже встаю на поезд, а так уже будет не до поспать!

custom 519498203079380639221custom 51928331641663346965custom 51949439000741518524

15 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC429 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Кстати вот его купила держу в курсе!! Жду с Японии теперь Обещаю что это последний мерч по чикаве из Японии….

custom 519266315218089112937custom 51928331641663346969custom 51949820307938063928custom 51949439000741518523

15 Aug 2026, 17:51 UTC421 views33 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 519283316416633469619custom 51926631521808911298custom 51949439000741518526

15 Aug 2026, 16:17 UTC537 views57 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Бензина нет, очереди по 80 человек…как думаете ночью на маршрутке доеду до поезда ? ❓

custom 519283316416633469634custom 519494390007415185211custom 52354534045447953729custom 51949820307938063923

15 Aug 2026, 16:16 UTC523 views62 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

custom 519283316416633469632custom 519266315218089112918custom 51949820307938063928custom 51949439000741518523custom 52354534045447953721

15 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC539 views40 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 519494390007415185227custom 51928331641663346968custom 51949820307938063925

15 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC482 views48 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Кстати кроссовки в которых я приехала и штаны уже выкинули (штаны забрали сказали отдадут на тряпки тоже кому то)

custom 519283316416633469630custom 519494390007415185210custom 51949820307938063927custom 52354534045447953721

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC449 views59 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Forwarded from @ch_tititychaPhoto

Как проходили сегодняшние закупки Снежи

custom 519266315218089112936custom 519283316416633469611custom 51949820307938063927custom 51949439000741518525

15 Aug 2026, 15:30 UTC451 views45 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Хотели отобрать футболку с овцой с мемом «где я нахуй», но ограничились футболкой со Шреком 😵

custom 519266315218089112930custom 51928331641663346968custom 51949820307938063925custom 51949439000741518522

15 Aug 2026, 15:29 UTC453 views50 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Прикиньте, футболку с мемами отобрали 1 штуку на тряпки половые 😵 Я самое лучшее взяла к ней значит, а она мне свою футболку дала, а мою на тряпки!!!!!!

custom 519266315218089112930custom 52354534045447953727custom 51928331641663346966custom 51949820307938063924custom 51949439000741518523

15 Aug 2026, 15:27 UTC457 views38 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Voice message

Voice message, posted without a caption

custom 519266315218089112924custom 51949439000741518527custom 51928331641663346966custom 52354534045447953721

Showing the 12 most recent of 107 posts we hold for @snezha_mrr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 374,481 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Баюша, не иначе” (@snezha_mrr), 9,498 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/snezha_mrr.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.