can't believe i turned my phone on for this shit lmao no more relapses lock in (at rehab 🩼)
😁7❤5😢5🤯4🔥1

Channel
@sneedfulcalls
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,885subscribers
-11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001584840108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sneedfulcalls |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sneedfulcalls |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 2,885 | -5 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 18:11 | 2,890 | -5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:40 | 2,895 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:46 | 2,896 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:33 | 2,896 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 November 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
113 reactions across 16 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 42 | 37.2% | |
| 😁 | 22 | 19.5% | |
| 🔥 | 20 | 17.7% | |
| 😢 | 14 | 12.4% | |
| 🤯 | 11 | 9.73% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 1.77% | |
| 🎉 | 1 | 0.885% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.885% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 113reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 26 November 2024 to 8 February 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
can't believe i turned my phone on for this shit lmao no more relapses lock in (at rehab 🩼)
😁7❤5😢5🤯4🔥1
Might have genuinely been the worst launch ive ever seen, didn't even have time to buy before it went to shit lmao Avoid untill they show something logging off again fuck this shit, see you guys in a couple weeks & lets run it back when my headspace & health is better
❤7😁6😢1
Aped dust on both since no access to main wallets for the past week (not home), risky but good r/r if this is legit (which it appears to be?)
Aped the first token on soneium https://dyorswap.finance/swap/?chainId=1868&outputCurrency=0x5EebdC6bc22b64888BF8c448cd67b2AEEae4Aedd&inputCurrency=ETH - can swap here 0x5EebdC6bc22b64888BF8c448cd67b2AEEae4Aedd https://fxtwitter.com/ObsoleteSony/status/1870423974922047919/photo/1 - some dog I think mcap around 30k Also bought first cat there ( $scat) 0xc8F866D5c7E7592255D42Fe236100C67f1A77133 Both small af mca…
Soneium Network To bridge : send eth ( erc 20 ) here 0xeb9bf100225c214Efc3E7C651ebbaDcF85177607 and it autobridges Rpc soneiumrpc.com 1868 ETH https://vk9a3tgpne6qmub8.blockscout.com/
❤2
Apparently sony stealth launched a L2 (not announced anywhere i see but shows up on dyorswap) Soneium
🤯1
Will try attending dms next week patience plz never been this cooked
Jfc
Also been in this for a bit, AITaxBot, 600k mcap, very relevant with tax szn coming up Traditional crypto tax tools can be a pain in the ass on-chain when ur trying to declare u sniping skibidi rizzmas inu paying an eth in gas fees and selling for a 100x with money you made from an airdrop you farmed for a year. It can get very complicated This one utilizes AI, specifically built for on chain to maximize for loopho…
❤1👍1
Gm If i said im back that'd be a lie, but gonna make an earnest attempt starting new week @ locking in, dusted off the desk, loaded fridge with nocco & zyn
🔥5🤯1
https://www.defined.fi/base/0x154111743cc66d0bd3c63c7c04bd004c89025b42?utm_medium=bots&utm_source=telegram"eToken=token1&cache=b4e1c If ur looking for beta ~ 500k$ The ski mask dogs real name is Pidan, little known fact The OG deployer aped right off launch, tells you all you need to know tbh https://basescan.org/tx/0x45444f4e882689c269606933d8f6ed4c7a5c46cd1e022b766a17e467e2c5bd71
❤1
10000x actually insane, 35k$ > 360m$, officially the biggest call on here in terms of x's frens who held are blowing up my messages or i wouldn't even know, gg if u held trough this absolute schizo chart, u deserve this trying to get back at desk ASAP
❤2🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sneedfulcalls. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 915,221 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“need for $need calls 😤” (@sneedfulcalls), 2,885 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sneedfulcalls.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.