Channel
@smluanlun
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
9,529subscribers
+325 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001051168590 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @smluanlun |
| Created | Between 1 May 2016 and 31 January 2017— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 26 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 26 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/smluanlun |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 26 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 9,529 | +41 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 9,488 | +39 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 07:12 | 9,449 | +63 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 09:28 | 9,386 | +61 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 15:34 | 9,325 | +47 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:18 | 9,278 | +69 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:11 | 9,209 | +5 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:47 | 9,204 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 6 April 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 31 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 June 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 29 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
486 reactions across 4 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 51.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 250 | 51.4% | |
| 👍 | 217 | 44.7% | |
| 😁 | 12 | 2.47% | |
| 🐳 | 2 | 0.412% | |
| 🥰 | 2 | 0.412% | |
| 🌚 | 1 | 0.206% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.206% | |
| 😴 | 1 | 0.206% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 486reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 6 April 2024 to 12 June 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌👌 🔥😀😀😀😀😀😀🔥 💸💸💸💸💸💸 全网天花板 最高福利 最高待遇 🔺🔻🔸🔹🔶🔷🔳🔲 PG：真人 ：持续爆分中..... 🔊🔊 👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉👉 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😆😆😆😆😆倍彩金等您来拿😆 支持 ABA 汇旺 USDT 大额无忧 ，安全可靠 😔👌👌👌👌👌给大家提供优质的服务： ✔️首存送👌👌😀+笔笔赠送 ✔️充值提现实时到账 ✔️每天存提，洗码无上限 ✔️充值渠道齐全【汇旺 - USDT - ABA -电子钱包】 ✔️不限IP😫无需实名😫无需绑卡 ✔️游戏放洪水 ✔️千万提款无限额 😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀😀 😆😆😆😆😆😆😆😆 😯平台管理： @xiaohaolele88 😯官方代理： @qqmmxxx000 😯官方客服： @taot555 📢官方网址： atmty12.me
❤91👍73😁1
你好 欢迎来到这里🔞 🐱在菲伟哥货到付款 🐱反差婊曝光 🐶sm调教 🐾露出偷拍 🐯少女福利姬 🦁麻豆国产 🐻❄️海角乱伦 🦦少女自慰 🐰反差婊的日常生活 🐰反差母狗自拍 🐰大学生反差 ✅点我一键关注所有服务
👍54❤46😁5🐳2🥰2🌚1👏1😴1
01.（下）雪姨45岁喜欢穿丝袜长发披肩小巧有气质 不过事不能急，能不能拿下我也不知道，雪姨说着两天就过来，不知道是不是忽悠我，让雪姨给我发几张漂亮的照片，就是不给我发 随便发的两张，唉，粉丝们你们要是看到雪姨真人，我觉着比照片漂亮，属于那种小巧类型的，可以看看照片，雪姨穿的灰色丝袜，在家， 聊天记录太多了，我随便切图一部分给粉丝们分享吧，说真的，我也不知道能不能拿下，也得等雪姨来了再说 等雪姨到了，我给粉丝们多拍几张照片看看 雪姨这个是意外更新，不知道能不能有后续更新，能不能拿下，我得想办法 这是快过年的时候跟雪姨聊天的一部分聊天记录 兄弟做事就是，一点点进展没有的，我是不会更新的，有一点点进展，我就觉着就是一个突破口，慢慢来，很多粉丝们说我也想搞亲戚朋友，但是你有想法没有做法啊，慢慢试探试探看看情况，不去试探怎么知道能不能成功那是不是 #妈妈的骚逼闺蜜雪姨
❤72👍59
03.（上）雪姨45岁看着像30岁少妇保养的真好 雪姨这么大的年龄，一点不输给年轻漂亮女孩，保养的很好 雪姨也是一个很保守的人，我是真的很喜欢，最近脑子里都是雪姨的样子啦， 现在在我心里真是女神，熟女成熟又漂亮好看 雪姨说我俩是升温阶段的异地恋。雪姨的头发其实都白了很多了，只是染黑了，鬓角仔细看都是白色的头发了，岁月不饶人 #妈妈的骚逼闺蜜雪姨
❤41👍31😁6
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @smluanlun. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@smluanlun named 8 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 26 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“乱伦 母女 父女” (@smluanlun), 9,529 subscribers as measured 26 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smluanlun.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.