Channel
@smithchif
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
16subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003800285320 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @smithchif |
| Created | Between 1 February 2026 and 30 June 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 18 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 18 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/smithchif |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:41 | 16 | +4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 12 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 12 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 July 2026 – 2 August 2026) |
| Views total | 486 |
| Reactions total | 76 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 06:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
106 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5377615628041482645 | 36 | 34.0% | |
| custom 5235875638484702742 | 26 | 24.5% | |
| custom 5233586077318556217 | 23 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5379583753855202778 | 7 | 6.60% | |
| custom 5420634677608229177 | 6 | 5.66% | |
| custom 5278310636923689672 | 3 | 2.83% | |
| custom 5282799788281075910 | 3 | 2.83% | |
| custom 5377599341525505692 | 2 | 1.89% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 106reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 July 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
sinclair – старинная шотландская фамилия, со значением " святой клевер, возвышенный". происходит от французского saint clair. носители этой фамилии издавна славились благородством и умением беречь свои главные тайны от посторонних глаз 🌟
custom 52335860773185562173custom 52358756384847027423custom 53776156280414826453
Channel name was changed to «sincľair»
Photo, posted without a caption
custom 53776156280414826453custom 52335860773185562172custom 52358756384847027422
мой язык любви - сделать тебя единственным человеком, которого я не игнорирую в те дни, когда не хочу ни с кем общаться
custom 52358756384847027424custom 52335860773185562172custom 53776156280414826452
🤍амые болезненные 🤩 самые освобождающие вопросы в момент упадка 🤎 🖤 : 01. какими прилагательными точнее всего характеризуются мои ощущения и чувства сейчас? 02. что мне это состояние не позволяет делать? к чему оно вынуждает меня? 03. если б я все таки исполняла желания из пункта 2, как изменилась бы моя жизнь? 04. Если бы прямо сейчас рядом со мной сидел человек, который видит меня настоящую и принимает целиком, …
custom 52358756384847027423custom 53776156280414826453custom 52335860773185562172
Sticker, posted without a caption
" и сколько их было?" трое, но каждого я любила за что то свое. С первым я была больше остальных. Лёгкий, удобный, ненавязчивый, он занимал место в моей жизни. Давал свободу, не держал возле себя, но стоило ему исчезнуть хоть на минуту, найти его было целой проблемой. Второй же был совершенно иной. С ним мне было спокойно, хотя он постоянно требовал быть рядом, цеплялся за все поряд, порой это ужасно раздражало! Но, …
custom 53776156280414826454custom 52335860773185562172custom 52358756384847027422
🤩people usually find comfort in characters they see themselves in :
custom 52335860773185562173custom 52358756384847027422custom 53776156280414826452
will i ever find the cure?
custom 53776156280414826453custom 52335860773185562172custom 52358756384847027422
«ты слишком впечатлительная» да, я действительно слишком впечатлительная, я могу расплакаться из-за надуманных себе мыслей, могу расплакаться от увиденной одинокой бабушки на улице, плачу когда вижу что-то очень милое, если кому-то плохо, плачу если кто-то проявляет заботу и любовь. но разве это плохо?
custom 53776156280414826454custom 52335860773185562172custom 52358756384847027421
Sticker, posted without a caption
☺️ чем можно написать в личный дневник? 🌟🤩 01. каких новых людей я встретил в этом году. чем они запомнились? 02. вещи, в которых ты врешь сама себе. трудно, но честно 03. вещи и привычки, которые делают тебя тобой 04. "версии меня", которые существовали раньше или в будущем. как насчёт письма себе? ожидания, разочарования, предупреждения, планы и все, что на душе так хочется сказать себе в тот период. 05.…
custom 52358756384847027424custom 52335860773185562173custom 53776156280414826453
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smithchif. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 660,778 of 1,565,402entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“sincľair” (@smithchif), 16 subscribers as measured 18 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smithchif.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.