Channel
@smell_of_science
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,699subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002068078689 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @smell_of_science |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/smell_of_science |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 17:28 | 1,699 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:21 | 1,700 | -2 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 16:03 | 1,702 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 1,702 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (17 July 2026 – 6 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,813 |
| Reactions total | 291 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
291 reactions across 7 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 170 | 58.4% | |
| 👍 | 60 | 20.6% | |
| 🔥 | 40 | 13.7% | |
| 😁 | 10 | 3.44% | |
| 🍓 | 8 | 2.75% | |
| 💅 | 2 | 0.687% | |
| 💯 | 1 | 0.344% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 291reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
По работе мне часто надо подбирать отдушки для ароматизации пространств – для диффузоров, автоароматизаторов, освежителей воздуха, и всегда встает вопрос – как понять, будет ли аромат хорошо пахнуть в воздухе? Далеко не всегда по отдушке с блоттера это очевидно – она не раскрывается в должной степени, «не летит», а замешивать из каждого образца диффузор с палками – долго и муторно. А тут мне удачно подарили ультразв…
❤15👍7😁4💅2💯1
Итак, я с удивлением обнаружил, что это загадочное gowé – это… широко распространенный сорняк из семейства Осоковые, более широко известный как Сыть круглая (Cyperus rotundus), и ближайший родственник чрезвычайно популярного парфюмерного растения нагармота (она же циперус или киприол). Оказалось, что сыть круглая известна как лекарственное растение уже тысячи лет, и ее применяли буквально в каждой традиционной медиц…
❤23👍21
Погрузился тут в один актуальный скандал в парфюмерной индустрии, и захотелось о нем рассказать. В чем суть: оманский бренд Amouage и парфюмерная компания CPL Aromas объявили, что они «открыли» новый парфюмерный компонент из Сенегала, некое gowé, и планирует использовать его экстракт в своих будущих ароматах. Если быть точным, первый пост на эту тему они озаглавили «An Industry First: Gowé, a New Natural Ingredient …
❤20👍11🔥8
На днях побывал на прекрасном уютном мероприятии в честь запуска нового аромата российского бренда Aurora Borealis – Ночное Солнце. Основатель бренда и президент Парфюмерного клуба России Марианна Пенькова собрала друзей бренда и блогеров в московском баре «Практика», где рассказала о новом аромате, традиционно вдохновленным красотой русской природы, на этот раз – полярным днем, когда солнце практически не исчезает …
❤19🍓8👍7🔥2
В последнее время часто промышляю лейерингом, т.е. наслаиванием ароматов. Это довольно трендовая штука, которая позволяет создать уникальную парфюмерную композицию под конкретный случай, комбинируя несколько духов или парфюмированных продуктов. Сочетать их можно по-разному, как душе угодно, но особенно удачно получается, когда у двух (и более) ароматов есть заметные пересечения в нотах и композиции, когда они контра…
❤28👍6🔥6
Ambre Latte Essential Parfums Считаю себя главным экспертом по парфюмерии Жорди Фернандеса из Givaudan, потому что, а) знаю, что он каталонец, и его имя читается именно так (а не «Хорди» или «Йорди»), б) сносил флакон его Genetic Bliss, и, ключевое в) сфоткался с ним в Дубае. И вот, Essential Parfums позвали Жорди, чтобы он сделал им новый Bois Imperial, но гурманский. И могу сказать, что в Ambre Latte действитель…
❤32👍8🔥6
Как эвалюаторы заканчивают тяжелую рабочую неделю? Конечно же, идут 1,5 часа нюхать нишу в Космотеку! Попробовали с моей коллегой Лерой новую марку Anti, где понравилось буквально все (такое бывает почти никогда!). И томатная овощная роза Rosa Antiqua, и горькие соленые стебли лилии Le Jardiner, и античные ладан с миррой Bast, и все остальные. Ужаснулись от новых экстрактов BTSO с бесчеловечными стойкостью и плотно…
❤33🔥18😁6
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @smell_of_science. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Какой-то химией пахнет!” (@smell_of_science), 1,699 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smell_of_science.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.