Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for کانال سید مرتضی افقه

Channel

کانال سید مرتضی افقه

@smAfghah

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,033subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001095262962
TypeChannel
Username@smAfghah
Created4 October 2016measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/smAfghah

Growth

1,0331,0361,034.56 August 2026 — 1,036 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,036 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,035 subscribers15 August 2026 — 1,033 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 9 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,033–1,036 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 01:561,033-2
9 Aug 2026, 00:501,035-1
6 Aug 2026, 13:031,036no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:381,036first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 20 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
15.8%
avg views ÷ 1,033 subscribers
Avg views / post
163
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.714%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held20 (20 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total3,261
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Aug 2026, 13:03 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 7 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 92.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💯1292.3%
👌17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC43 viewsread 6 August 2026

https://jahanesanat.ir/%D8%B3%D9%82%D9%88%D8%B7-%D8%A7%D8%AE%D9%84%D8%A7%D9%82-%D8%B2%DB%8C%D8%B1-%D8%A2%D9%88%D8%A7%D8%B1-%D8%AA%D9%88%D8%B1%D9%85/#:~:text=%D8%AA%D8%AD%D9%84%DB%8C%D9%84-,%D8%AC%D9%87%D8%A7%D9%86,-%D8%B5%D9%86%D8%B9%D8%AA%20%D9%86%D8%AA%DB%8C%D8%AC%D9%87%20%D8%A8%D8%AD%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%E2%80%8C%D9%87%D8%A7%DB%8C بررسی می‌کند: سقوط اخلاق زیر آوار تورم فاطمه عباس پور کدخبر: 648686چهارشنبه 14 مرداد

Signed Morteza Afghah

5 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC33 viewsread 6 August 2026

من واقعا نمی‌دانم کسانی که بر ادامه این شرایط اصرار دارند، چه پاسخی برای پیامدهای اقتصادی و اجتماعی آن دارند.

Signed Morteza Afghah

5 Aug 2026, 22:47 UTC47 viewsread 6 August 2026

چرا سیاست‌های حمایتی دولت اثربخش نبوده است؟ آیا مشکل در نوع این سیاست‌هاست یا در میزان حمایت‌ها؟ متاسفانه سال‌هاست گروهی از اقتصاددانان، نسخه‌هایی را برای اقتصاد ایران تجویز کرده‌اند که به اعتقاد من بارها شکست خورده است. یکی از مهم‌ترین این نسخه‌ها، آزادسازی نرخ ارز بود. استدلال آنها این بود که دولت از محل افزایش درآمدهای ارزی، منابع لازم برای پرداخت یارانه یا کالابرگ را تامین می‌کند اما من سال‌هاست هشدار می‌دهم که

Signed Morteza Afghah

3 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC83 views2 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

مرتضی افقه در برنامه " گفتمان اقتصادی" (بخش سوم): ادامه روند فعلی، صنعت نفت را در مسیر افول قرار می‌دهد / اصلاح حکمرانی مهم‌تر از تزریق سرمایه است مرتضی افقه استاد دانشگاه و کارشناس اقتصادی با تاکید بر اینکه آینده صنعت نفت ایران بیش از آنکه به کمبود منابع مالی یا فناوری وابسته باشد، به کیفیت حکمرانی و نظام تصمیم‌گیری گره خورده است، هشدار داد که در صورت تداوم روند فعلی، نه تنها چشم‌انداز روشنی پیش روی صنعت نفت وجود ند

💯2

Signed Morteza Afghah

2 Aug 2026, 10:46 UTC100 viewsread 6 August 2026
Video

قسمت دوم مصاحبه با مرتضی افقه: سوءتدبیر، نفت ایران را از توسعه عقب انداخت /فساد نفت، محصول فرعی بحران تصمیم‌گیری است مرتضی افقه، استاد دانشگاه و کارشناس اقتصادی، با تاکید بر اینکه بستر فساد تنها محدود به حوزه نفت نیست، گفت شبکه‌های غیرشفاف، امتیازات ویژه، ضعف نظارت و اولویت یافتن ملاحظات غیرمعیشتی در تصمیم‌گیری‌ها، زمینه‌ساز رانت و فساد در اقتصاد ایران شده است. او همچنین تصریح کرد مشکل اصلی کشور کمبود منابع نیست، بلک

Signed Morteza Afghah

2 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC100 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://safheeghtesad.ir/fa/tiny/news-346906

💯1

Signed Morteza Afghah

1 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC102 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Morteza Afghah

1 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC112 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

Signed Morteza Afghah

31 Jul 2026, 14:35 UTC109 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @dastranjnews_ir

✅چرا تاثیر یارانه و کالابرگ در معیشت مردم کم شد؟! مرتضی افقه (اقتصاددان): 🔸حمایت‌های معیشتی، برخلاف تصور رایج، مختص اقتصاد ایران نیست و در بسیاری از کشورهای جهان نیز در شرایط بحران اجرا می‌شود. 🔸کلاً در شرایط خاص و بحران‌ها، کشورهایی با بازار آزاد هم در این مواقع وارد می‌شوند و شرایط را کنترل و مدیریت می‌کنند. کالابرگ، کنترل قیمت و ... سیاست‌هایی است که دولت‌های کل دنیا انجام می‌دهند تا از بحران گذر کنند. 🔸مشکل ا

Signed Morteza Afghah

31 Jul 2026, 08:28 UTC108 viewsread 6 August 2026
Forwarded from @EtemadOnlinePhoto

🔻چرا تاثیر یارانه و کالابرگ در معیشت مردم کم شد؟ افقه، اقتصاددان: 🔹مشکل این است که کالابرگ و یارانه مبلغ‌شان ثابت می‌ماند ولی تورم ناشی از آزادسازی قیمت ارز با سرعت پیش می‌رود. 🔹یارانه نیز یک رانت است؛ یارانه و رانت به خودی خود بد نیست؛ اینکه رانت در ذهن مردم بد تلقی می‌شود به خاطر سوءاستفاده‌های افراد از رانت‌هاست. 🔹مشکل زمانی ایجاد می‌شود که رانت از هدف اصلی خود منحرف شود./ایسنا #اقتصادی @EtemadOnline

Signed Morteza Afghah

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @smAfghah. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“کانال سید مرتضی افقه” (@smAfghah), 1,033 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/smAfghah.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.