Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

что-то с бисером

@slly_mffn

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,782subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001617636192
TypeChannel
Username@slly_mffn
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/slly_mffn

Growth

1,7811,7821,781.513 Aug 2026, 04:04 — 1,781 subscribers14 Aug 2026, 00:38 — 1,782 subscribers13 Aug 2026, 04:0414 Aug 2026, 00:38
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,781–1,782 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 00:381,782+1
13 Aug 2026, 04:041,781first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 7 March 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 July 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 26s
Average length
52s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,310 reactions across 12 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
51239.1%
custom 530990871991027261233925.9%
❤‍🔥21216.2%
🍓14611.1%
🌚503.82%
🔥120.916%
🕊100.763%
80.611%
🎉60.458%
👀60.458%
💘50.382%
💋20.153%
😍10.076%
🤩10.076%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it isTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,310reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2025 to 10 July 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jul 2025, 16:44 UTC≈4,100 views153 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

☀️ привет, солнышки вижу, что потеряли. новых постов давно не было, так как сейчас не плету, вместо этого отдыхаю, гуляю, играю. Оказалось, что если чаще выходить из дома, свободного времени остаётся совсем немного Бисерные идеи у меня всё ещё есть, возможно, продолжу понемногу выкладывать в скором времени но а пока что я всё так же на связи, как и раньше отвечаю на ваши комментарии под постами

96custom 530990871991027261231❤‍🔥14🍓7🕊3🌚1💘1

18 Apr 2025, 16:24 UTC≈5,480 views109 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Если вы меня потеряли, то я вас понимаю 🐱 Я тоже себя немножечко потеряла. Совсем не поняла, почему вдруг стало не хватать времени в сутках Вместо бисера пока что балуюсь такими вот приколюшками

custom 53099087199102726127617🍓9🌚3🕊2❤‍🔥1🔥1

10 Apr 2025, 17:06 UTC≈5,200 views107 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

продолжаю крутить роллы обновила чехол для телефона и очень хочу дополнить его шнурком. не хватает для уверенности чего-то такого в руку. собственно "шнурок" планирую собрать из сушиков и это будет даже не шнурок, а цепочка мои смешнявки пока что выглядят так [криво, но я переделаю. наверное. может быть]. оказалось, я не умею закручивать пины, что не удивительно, т.к. до этого я никогда их не закручивала 🤪 Пока н

67❤‍🔥13custom 530990871991027261210🌚9🍓3💘21🕊1

3 Apr 2025, 17:26 UTC≈4,340 views115 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 53099087199102726125947🎉5🌚3🍓1

3 Apr 2025, 17:26 UTC≈4,020 views85 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

А я тут с анимацией балуюсь Что-то такое нашло на меня, пока ничего не плела 🪿 Параллельно посматривала различные видео с теорией анимации Ниже скину ещё кружок с пиксельным гусём программы: procreate, resprite (аналог aseprite) Как вы проводите время?

❤‍🔥4817custom 530990871991027261214🔥4🌚1🍓1

28 Mar 2025, 17:16 UTC≈4,100 views134 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

А так милашки выглядят а собранном виде

86custom 530990871991027261217🍓13❤‍🔥9🔥5🌚4

28 Mar 2025, 17:15 UTC≈3,840 views115 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Как и обещала Ещё порция кубиков

🍓6023❤‍🔥21custom 53099087199102726128🕊2🔥1

21 Mar 2025, 18:26 UTC≈4,040 views96 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video

впервые кажется за всё время воспользовалась функцией выгрузки спидпейнта/таймлапса из procreate здесь я придумываю форму печеньки и рисую к ней схему я даже залипла на какое-то время 😧 пришлось правда сильно ускорить, хотя даже так видео идёт бессовестных три минуты скетч и схема нарисованы в Procreate, бусины и леска в Linearity Curve, после чего экспортированы в procreate, поэтому на видео не видно, как я их ри

56custom 530990871991027261223🍓83❤‍🔥2🌚2💋2

18 Mar 2025, 17:52 UTC≈4,110 views141 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

вдохновилась мини-суши-роллами из пинтереста 🥢 первый сплела по схеме (почти), следующие уже по ощущениям + референсам в виде реальных роллов х) уже есть идея, как использовать малышек 😋 я честно говоря теряюсь в том, кому принадлежит авторство схемы, так как похожих схем оказалось очень много. в комментариях оставлю ссылки на те пины, которые мне встретились

❤‍🔥78custom 53099087199102726122823🍓5💘2🕊2🌚1🎉1

18 Mar 2025, 17:52 UTC≈3,550 views58 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

🍓35🌚7👀6custom 5309908719910272612433

12 Mar 2025, 16:44 UTC≈4,750 views98 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

сделала✨ ну тут выбор оказался очевиден, недоплетёныша буду расплетать и переделывать в такой же 🌸

66custom 530990871991027261216🌚7❤‍🔥4🍓31😍1

7 Mar 2025, 17:14 UTC≈4,040 views99 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

промежуточный результат, ровно половина кубика хочу теперь сделать такой же, но со сквозным отверстием по центру 🤔

custom 530990871991027261253❤‍🔥22🌚1211🍓1

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @slly_mffn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,100,125 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“что-то с бисером” (@slly_mffn), 1,782 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slly_mffn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.