Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Sleeptime 2

@sleept11m

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

73subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003652948253
TypeChannel
Username@sleept11m
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sleept11m

Growth

7310 Aug 2026, 12:16 — 73 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:12 — 73 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 12:1611 Aug 2026, 12:12
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 72–74 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 12:1273no change
10 Aug 2026, 12:1673first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 24 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
137.0%
avg views ÷ 73 subscribers
Avg views / post
100
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
23.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held12 (24 July 20269 August 2026)
Views total1,200
Reactions total276
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

276 reactions across 12 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9032.6%
custom 60398281168288540947125.7%
custom 5343644017278096853259.06%
custom 5460970794249132497248.70%
🐳217.61%
custom 5235701043769131012155.43%
🆒82.90%
custom 537549975105782866762.17%
❤‍🔥51.81%
🍓41.45%
custom 546327391892200080131.09%
👾31.09%
🌚10.362%

Custom emoji. 6 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 276reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC26 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я хз будет ли законно присылать их лица открыто, так что на всякий крайняк закрыла Комик кон КЛАСС косплеи КЛАСС я весь комик кон искала Данте ибо это была моя изначальная цель но и от остальных не отказалась

custom 60398281168288540949custom 54609707942491324977custom 534364401727809685341🆒1

8 Aug 2026, 13:28 UTC35 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @sspaffickkPhoto

Спафик досмотрела блич

6custom 60398281168288540943custom 53436440172780968532🐳1🆒1custom 52357010437691310121

7 Aug 2026, 01:32 UTC86 views29 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Я уже давно подумывала нарисовать что-то для Марсика 🤭

16custom 60398281168288540945custom 54632739189220008013🐳1🆒1custom 52357010437691310121custom 53436440172780968531custom 54609707942491324971

6 Aug 2026, 11:53 UTC45 views16 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @O1marsikPhoto

Вот это секси мужчина (Хотела нарисовать его с Хоукинсом но чёт не придумала как)

7custom 60398281168288540944custom 53436440172780968533🐳1custom 52357010437691310121

6 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC48 views19 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @moirashikikaPhoto

| Прыжок веры в вп аск 🤍🤍 Считайте что Смокер из большого вк аска вдохновитель Лайк репост пожалуйста спсбо¡

9custom 60398281168288540945🍓3custom 52357010437691310121custom 53436440172780968531

6 Aug 2026, 06:34 UTC57 views23 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

А яйца не жмет нет не жмет

12🐳4custom 60398281168288540944🆒1custom 52357010437691310121custom 53436440172780968531

29 Jul 2026, 19:07 UTC207 views34 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Чето ехидно улыбается Вспомнил что-то хорошее

custom 6039828116828854094148custom 53754997510578286676custom 53436440172780968532🍓1🐳1🆒1custom 52357010437691310121

29 Jul 2026, 04:38 UTC122 views17 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @O1marsikPhoto

МОЕ ЗОЛОТЦЕ ГОТОВО

🐳7custom 60398281168288540944custom 534364401727809685332custom 52357010437691310121

28 Jul 2026, 15:16 UTC124 views22 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Очень насыщенный день и в тт я увидела тутор на покрас и попробовала мне понравилось

custom 60398281168288540949custom 52357010437691310125custom 534364401727809685341🌚1🐳1🆒1

27 Jul 2026, 13:42 UTC132 views21 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Чуваки Без подписона на этот канал не впускаю в щп канал

custom 546097079424913249710custom 60398281168288540946🐳3custom 52357010437691310121custom 53436440172780968531

25 Jul 2026, 21:26 UTC151 views26 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

14❤‍🔥5🐳2👾1🆒1custom 52357010437691310121custom 53436440172780968531custom 60398281168288540941

24 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC167 views33 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Кмм для пинки⭐

14custom 60398281168288540947custom 54609707942491324976👾2custom 53436440172780968532🆒1custom 52357010437691310121

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @sleept11m. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,004,765 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Sleeptime 2” (@sleept11m), 73 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sleept11m.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.