3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between โ snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean โno change observedโ, never โinterpolatedโ. The vertical axis spans 72โ73 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log โ every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 03:36
72
-1
9 Aug 2026, 22:02
73
no change
7 Aug 2026, 04:32
73
first reading
Engagement
3 posts held, back to 6 August 2023 โ the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelโs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramโs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute โ we hold 3 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 January 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
โค
1
100.0%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities โ ๐ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another โ so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one โ 4.34K, 1.2M โ so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 3 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramโs own count on each post โ not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above โ those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by โa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageโ.
Measured over the 3 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2023 to 27 January 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Alright folks, it's time for the real rewards ๐
I'm launching an absolutely groundbreaking campaign: One Million Tokens for One Million Subscribers ๐คฌ
Everybody (and I mean it) will receive $YKS โ a token of limited supply and compelling tokenomics ๐ณ. All you need to do is join via the form and be my follower on YouTube.
Want more action? ๐ง Go ahead โ I'll raffle special amounts of $YKS throughout the campaign โ raโฆ
The Farming Szn Ain't Over ๐
I've been sticking to the Telegram mini-apps since early 2022 โ even before they released. It was clear back then that crypto dApps will start migrating over to the messenger. And that's exactly what happened โ with projects like Notcoin starting to score millions of users ๐ฑ
The most frequent question I'm still being asked is 'is there more alpha to find? ๐ณ'. A plenty of teams choose toโฆ
Showing the 3 most recent of 3 posts we hold for @slaykingtrades. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked โ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it โ t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so โ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank โ 481,838 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below โ republished posts weigh more than named mentions โ and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelโs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page โ a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 โ this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
โSlay King ๐โ (@slaykingtrades), 72 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slaykingtrades.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV ยท JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
