Channel
@slattsavage
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
12,167subscribers
+1,044 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001689379569 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @slattsavage |
| Description | booking: @hoodmoneymngt реклама / фиты ск: @brokeslime |
| Created | 17 December 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 60 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/slattsavage |
Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 22:45 | 12,167 | +2 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 10:00 | 12,165 | +7 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 06:27 | 12,158 | -1 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 07:48 | 12,159 | -5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 08:54 | 12,164 | +2 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 08:11 | 12,162 | +5 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 07:06 | 12,157 | +1 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:19 | 12,156 | +4 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 06:45 | 12,152 | -7 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:49 | 12,159 | +4 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 05:26 | 12,155 | +16 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 04:59 | 12,139 | +13 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 08:27 | 12,126 | +13 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 06:07 | 12,113 | +5 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 05:41 | 12,108 | +15 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 06:51 | 12,093 | -2 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 00:46 | 12,095 | +8 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 01:08 | 12,087 | +6 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 04:31 | 12,081 | +5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 07:38 | 12,076 | first reading |
91 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 65 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 91 (11 July 2026 – 30 October 2026) |
| Views total | 75,840 |
| Reactions total | 1,307 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
12,990 reactions across 91 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5278725062613041869 | 5,585 | 43.0% | |
| custom 5280997834752033612 | 2,819 | 21.7% | |
| custom 5278551863761861615 | 2,677 | 20.6% | |
| custom 5278354333920951117 | 908 | 6.99% | |
| custom 5280662071388697783 | 704 | 5.42% | |
| custom 5278336995137977528 | 155 | 1.19% | |
| custom 5280832525755777844 | 142 | 1.09% |
Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 91 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12,990 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 30 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @slattsavage. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 91 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 July 2026 to 30 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 11 posts held from the last 30 days (18.2%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Джон Гарик — Кубрик (Music Video) Смотреть На YouTube
custom 528099783475203361251custom 527855186376186161513custom 52783543339209511179custom 52787250626130418692
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 527872506261304186961custom 527835433392095111720custom 527855186376186161518
кто не играл пацаны не упустите возможность реально прочувствовать кайф кто помнит ваще стримил как-то прохождение даже
custom 5278725062613041869107custom 527855186376186161511custom 527835433392095111710
File, posted without a caption
custom 52787250626130418696custom 52783543339209511174custom 52785518637618616154
еду в трамвае чувствую себя как буд я в игре getting up не хватает реально плеера с наушниками кто знает ваще эту тему
custom 5278354333920951117122custom 527872506261304186928custom 527855186376186161513
всем привет друзья спешу сообщить вам приятные вести, я наконец-то переехал в Москву! можете меня поздравить я теперь на местности поэтому друзья коллеги бренды пишите, уже завтра еду на съемки небезызвестного проекта вместе с друзьями делать реп. поскольку теперь мне нужно больше зарабатывать дабы не сдохнуть от голода принимаю предложения по рекламе, совместным работам на ск/площадки пишите тут @brokeslime действу…
custom 5278725062613041869116custom 527835433392095111729custom 528099783475203361226custom 52785518637618616155
Hunty Hump, DooMee, Slatt Savage - My Baby </3 СЛУШАТЬ ВЕЗДЕ 🥀 prod by bl1zzy, laguna, echoo m&m by galatuza 💔💔💔
custom 527872506261304186967custom 528083252575577784410custom 52785518637618616152
трек с ханти и данатом в эту пятницу
custom 527855186376186161549custom 52787250626130418699custom 52809978347520336128
Video message, posted without a caption
custom 527872506261304186984custom 527855186376186161528custom 527835433392095111725
Video, posted without a caption
custom 527872506261304186976custom 527855186376186161515custom 527835433392095111712custom 52808325257557778442
👻👻👻
custom 5278725062613041869185custom 527835433392095111747custom 527855186376186161530custom 52809978347520336123
Москва вы ебать крейзи тоже после Питера чуть был в ахуе думал ну в Москве хоть поспокойнее будет а вы тоже пол шоу слэмились это было сильно я рад быть частью этих событий спасибо что со мной спасибо за поддержку спасибо организаторам мероприятий спасибо моему брату Исаю спасибо мой кореш Картель спасибо мой брат Джон Гарик спасибо Хансен Москва я думаю увидимся совсем скоро, Питер надеюсь тоже) кидайте видосы с шо…
custom 5278354333920951117193custom 528083252575577784443custom 527855186376186161528
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @slattsavage. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@slattsavage edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 2 posts on @slattsavage as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 45 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Slatt Savage” (@slattsavage), 12,167 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slattsavage.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.