Channel

᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ︎ ︎

@slalak828

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

39subscribers

+8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID	-1003301646692
Type	Channel
Username	@slalak828
Created	16 November 2025 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded	11 August 2026
Last confirmed live	28 August 2026
Measurements held	5
Confirmed unchanged	1 time, most recently 28 August 2026
On Telegram	t.me/slalak828

Growth

5 measurements spanning 21 days, net +8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 30–40 and does not start at zero.

Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)	Subscribers	Change
28 Aug 2026, 20:55	39	+8
22 Aug 2026, 12:47	31	-2
14 Aug 2026, 15:35	33	+2
11 Aug 2026, 03:02	31	no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:47	31	first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

416 reactions across 4 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 15.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction	Count	Share
custom 5337271930783302398	63	15.1%
custom 5332773721339884311	43	10.3%
custom 5393150443146735005	32	7.69%
custom 5319059598705983521	29	6.97%
custom 5321140514655862824	29	6.97%
custom 5299014668507975050	28	6.73%
🍓	26	6.25%
🕊	26	6.25%
custom 5422545598752525291	25	6.01%
💘	24	5.77%
custom 5337051826594284193	22	5.29%
custom 5337325686593976241	19	4.57%
custom 5296478073707856219	17	4.09%
custom 5222142867102800991	10	2.40%
custom 5222185099516221824	9	2.16%
💅	7	1.68%
🦄	7	1.68%

Custom emoji. 12 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 416reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 9 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

21 Feb 2026, 07:31 UTCAnonymous Poll166 voters

who are you me??

🐾друг/подруга8%
🐾знакомый/ая6%
🐾с одного чата25%
🐾незнакомый человек39%
🐾фанат22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 16 November 2025 to 9 May 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 133,718 of 1,627,445entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

bhld🦞🦞
@karinauchixa · 171 post

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

bhld🦞🦞
@karinauchixa · 171 post

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“᠌᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ᠌ ︎ ︎” (@slalak828), 39 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/slalak828.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.