Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for В гостях у Сладкого

Channel

В гостях у Сладкого

@sladkiynews

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

12,106subscribers

-4,561 since we began measuring on 18 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003636437645
TypeChannel
Username@sladkiynews
DescriptionВладелец: @timoffey2 Реклама: @oldpurple @reklama_nikita @Seriiiva
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded18 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 November 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sladkiynews

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Previous handles

@sladkiynews was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@sugardaddysladkiy
held 18 August 2026 – 18 August 2026

Growth

12,10616,66714,386.518 August 2026 — 16,667 subscribers18 August 2026 — 16,653 subscribers19 August 2026 — 16,583 subscribers20 August 2026 — 16,513 subscribers21 August 2026 — 16,443 subscribers22 August 2026 — 16,366 subscribers24 August 2026 — 16,240 subscribers25 August 2026 — 16,186 subscribers26 August 2026 — 16,125 subscribers27 August 2026 — 16,089 subscribers28 August 2026 — 16,044 subscribers29 August 2026 — 15,979 subscribers30 August 2026 — 15,954 subscribers31 August 2026 — 15,910 subscribers1 September 2026 — 15,843 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,386 subscribers3 September 2026 — 14,311 subscribers5 September 2026 — 14,238 subscribers8 September 2026 — 14,076 subscribers11 September 2026 — 13,962 subscribers13 September 2026 — 13,892 subscribers14 September 2026 — 13,809 subscribers16 September 2026 — 13,734 subscribers19 September 2026 — 13,640 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,185 subscribers3 November 2026 — 12,169 subscribers4 November 2026 — 12,147 subscribers5 November 2026 — 12,120 subscribers6 November 2026 — 12,106 subscribers18 August 20266 November 2026
29 measurements spanning 81 days, net -4,561. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,422–17,351 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Nov 2026, 20:2112,106-14
5 Nov 2026, 19:4712,120-27
4 Nov 2026, 18:1912,147-22
3 Nov 2026, 20:3912,169-16
3 Nov 2026, 10:2212,185-1,455
19 Sept 2026, 08:0113,640-94
16 Sept 2026, 19:2013,734-75
14 Sept 2026, 19:3813,809-83
13 Sept 2026, 04:1613,892-70
11 Sept 2026, 06:1813,962-114
8 Sept 2026, 12:1814,076-162
5 Sept 2026, 10:1714,238-73
3 Sept 2026, 13:5414,311-75
2 Sept 2026, 03:5414,386-1,457
1 Sept 2026, 03:2615,843-67
31 Aug 2026, 04:3815,910-44
30 Aug 2026, 03:4615,954-25
29 Aug 2026, 05:4215,979-65
28 Aug 2026, 05:5816,044-45
27 Aug 2026, 07:5416,089first reading

Engagement

92 posts held, back to 9 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.8%
avg views ÷ 12,106 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,550
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.881%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
27
of 92 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 24 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held92 (9 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total41,772
Reactions total330
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 22:30 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
216
Videos
31
Links
28

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
2m 55s
Average length
19s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

1,890 reactions across 87 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,05755.9%
💩60131.8%
🔥1055.56%
👍1005.29%
🥰271.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 88 of the 92 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,890 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 27 posts held from the last 30 days (11.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 16:48 UTC468 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сегодня в мастерской вышёл новый сэт на Шейкера, как он вам?

❤1

4 Nov 2026, 16:07 UTC988 views11 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

У Kez есть фраза к невыпущенному герою: «Пососи мой клюв, дружок!» А также раннее датамайнеры находили концепты невыпущенных героев: среди них был bird_samurai (kez), Dawnbreaker, Hoodwink и Muerta, а также неназванный вампир, который до сих пор не вышел. Инфу взял у Dotanews

🥰9❤2

4 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC940 views4 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

На фоне последней выпущенной трежерки красуется вампирский замок:

❤4

4 Nov 2026, 16:06 UTC869 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Первый стиль арканы на дровку добавленный в последней трежерке имеет осиновые колья, а также название «Helsing»

🥰1

4 Nov 2026, 16:05 UTC826 viewsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Всё таки новость про вампира скорее всего не фейк! Игроки нашли очень много отсылок на нового героя, который с большой вероятностью будет связан с вампирами

4 Nov 2026, 05:45 UTC911 views12 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Оказалось что это баг на осеннем ландшафте, так что к сожалению пока что выход перса прийдеться отложить(

❤12

3 Nov 2026, 20:07 UTC≈1,160 views19 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Валв анонсировали нового персонажа?! Прямо сейчас из персонажей начала идти кровь, возможно новый герой будет как-то связан с ней

❤19

3 Nov 2026, 17:45 UTC≈1,140 views17 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Сервера доты опять лягли, пользователи предположили, что это связано с тём, что дядя габен празднует своё др, сто думаете по этому поводу?

🥰11❤4👍2

3 Nov 2026, 16:21 UTC≈1,070 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

Представляю вашему вниманию новый баг на Мипо Для этого вам нужно: купить два свитка телепортации на клоне, использовать их и продать на основном персонаже Вот и всё, сервера - сломаны

❤5💩1

2 Nov 2026, 18:18 UTC≈1,200 views24 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Недолго музыка играла

❤24

2 Nov 2026, 18:17 UTC≈1,200 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Zxcursed разбанили на твиче, он отреагировал на это очень позитивно, ведь он сидел в бане 5 лет, что думаете по этому поводу?

❤21🥰4

2 Nov 2026, 15:15 UTC≈1,180 views3 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

BetBoomTeam временно прекращают своё существование. Из-за плохих результатов за последнее время они решили временно приостановить выступления на турнирах

❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 92 posts we hold for @sladkiynews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 5 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Oct 2026, 13:37 UTCAnonymous Poll184 voters

Хотели бы, чтобы я как раньше снимал новости про киберспорт?

  1. Да72%
  2. Нет37%

The shares total 109%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

1 Sept 2026, 21:13 UTCAnonymous Poll626 voters

Какой лучший ландшафт?

  1. Reef's Edge32%
  2. Desert16%
  3. The Emerald Abyss17%
  4. Senctums of the divine23%
  5. Immortal Gardens34%
  6. Overgrown Empire13%
  7. King's New Journey15%

The shares total 150%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

27 Aug 2026, 17:11 UTCAnonymous Poll1,030 voters approx.

Какой у вас процентиль?

  1. Топ 100🔥13%
  2. 1500 лучших4%
  3. 95 процентиль15%
  4. 90 процентиль14%
  5. 85 процентиль15%
  6. Ниже🌧47%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

25 Aug 2026, 17:27 UTCAnonymous Poll1,270 voters approx.

За кого болели на инте?

  1. Спириты🐲51%
  2. Пари👁44%
  3. Яндексы🪿4%
  4. Нигма🌌2%
  5. Ликвиды🐴3%
  6. Фальконы🐦‍🔥5%
  7. Бетбум🎪2%
  8. Айронвинг🪽2%
  9. ХУЛИГАНЫ🤢😈😈😈17%

The shares total 130%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

9 Aug 2026, 13:59 UTCAnonymous Poll443 voters

А вам понравилась Василиса?

  1. Пёсик пёсик ав ав авк22%
  2. Охаёшечки датебаешечки26%
  3. ОУУУ НАЙС, ОЦЕ ПОТУЖНО74%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 92 most recent posts we hold, published 9 August 2026 to 5 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“В гостях у Сладкого” (@sladkiynews), 12,106 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sladkiynews.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.