Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Skyindustry | дроны, БПЛА, FPV --o===[|]===o--

Channel

Skyindustry | дроны, БПЛА, FPV --o===[|]===o--

@skyindustry

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

11,866subscribers

+462 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001283688736
TypeChannel
Username@skyindustry
DescriptionНовости беспилотников, свежие обзоры бпла, посты о дронах, FPV Тех. поддержка: @skyindustry_tech_sup_bot Админ: @semoffor Реклама: https://telega.in/c/skyindustry Голос за канал: https://t.me/boost/skyindustry Магазин ОЗОН: https://ozon.ru/t/IxVaNM5
CreatedBetween 1 April 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/skyindustry

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 91% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. This entry also sits inside a group of 17 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (1 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@skyindustry/3415 · this entry27 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC@mil_hub/13895627 Oct 2026, 18:15 UTC1.0019 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@mil_hub7 (7/7 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.008 minutesthis entry (7–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 44 comparable posts for this entry, running 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 17 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @height_hunter. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 17 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,40411,86611,6356 August 202610 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 95 days, net +462. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,335–11,935 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Nov 2026, 03:0811,866+7
8 Nov 2026, 18:4511,859+8
7 Nov 2026, 08:4911,851+8
6 Nov 2026, 07:1011,843+6
5 Nov 2026, 06:4111,837+5
4 Nov 2026, 08:4711,832+8
3 Nov 2026, 08:3911,824+6
2 Nov 2026, 05:3811,818+6
1 Nov 2026, 02:2911,812+3
30 Oct 2026, 04:2811,809+1
29 Oct 2026, 02:5811,808+15
28 Oct 2026, 03:5711,793+11
27 Oct 2026, 01:5911,782-1
26 Oct 2026, 04:5711,783-5
25 Oct 2026, 02:0511,788+14
23 Oct 2026, 23:5611,774+6
23 Oct 2026, 01:2611,768+7
21 Oct 2026, 23:1911,761+1
20 Oct 2026, 15:0711,760+8
19 Oct 2026, 12:5911,752first reading

Engagement

44 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 64 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 11,866 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,250
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.496%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 44 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held44 (29 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total31,473
Reactions total156
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Nov 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,400
Videos
≈1,110
Links
≈1,460

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
30m 07s
Average length
1m 02s

Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

526 reactions across 44 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍20939.7%
🔥16731.7%
❤9417.9%
👏326.08%
🤯183.42%
👎61.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 44 of the 44 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 526 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 44 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 18:08 UTC283 views5 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Дрон для автономного патрулирования дома Компания Ring, принадлежащая Amazon, представила Drone Cam, компактный беспилотник для охраны помещений. Устройство самостоятельно облетает комнаты по заданным маршрутам, проверяет обстановку и передаёт видео владельцу на смартфон. Дрон может запускаться по расписанию, по команде пользователя или автоматически при срабатывании датчиков безопасности. Система AI Pilot на базе и…

👍3🔥2

9 Nov 2026, 09:49 UTC≈1,880 views8 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Инженер создал самобалансирующийся шест с пропеллерами от дрона Американский авиационный инженер Питер Райсек разработал необычную конструкцию - карбоновый шест, способный самостоятельно удерживаться вертикально, опираясь на поверхность точкой размером с монету. На его вершине установлены четыре двигателя с пропеллерами от FPV-дрона. Система на базе полётного контроллера Pixhawk постоянно корректирует положение шест…

❤8

7 Nov 2026, 13:42 UTC≈1,150 views14 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

В Китае испытали летающую электростанцию В китайском городе Юэян успешно испытали высотную ветроэнергетическую установку S4000, способную подниматься на высоту до 4000 метров. Огромная конструкция длиной 67 метров, шириной 40 метров и высотой 23 метра впервые совершила испытательный полёт в городской среде. Наполненная гелием платформа поднимает в воздух электрогенераторы, которые используют более сильные и стабильн…

🔥8❤4👏2

6 Nov 2026, 07:46 UTC≈1,470 views6 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Полноразмерный прототип реактивного беспилотного истребителя X-BAT Американская компания Shield AI впервые показала полноразмерный прототип боевого беспилотника X-BAT 001, способного вертикально взлетать и приземляться без взлётно-посадочной полосы. Аппарат выполнен по бесхвостой схеме с элементами малозаметности и оснащён турбореактивным двигателем с управляемым вектором тяги. Разработка ориентирована на применение…

❤3👍3

5 Nov 2026, 12:38 UTC≈5,480 views10 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Презентация DJI Matrice 5T DJI представила Matrice 5T промышленный беспилотник для поисково-спасательных операций, инспекций и картографирования. Новинка рассчитана на работу ночью, в дождь и в условиях слабого сигнала GNSS. Дрон оснащён тепловизором с разрешением 1280×1024 пикселя и улучшенным режимом 2K, а широкоугольная камера обеспечивает цветное ночное изображение. Для безопасной навигации Matrice 5T используе…

👍8❤2

5 Nov 2026, 06:53 UTC≈1,040 views10 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Турецкий Bayraktar TB2 превратили в носитель FPV-дронов Компания Baykar испытала ударный беспилотник Bayraktar TB2 в роли воздушного носителя 16 FPV-дронов-камикадзе Skydagger. Во время полёта аппарат сбросил два дрона, которые успешно поразили наземные цели. Сам TB2 выступал ретранслятором связи, позволяя операторам управлять FPV на большом удалении. Это решение увеличивает дальность применения FPV-дронов и позволя…

👍5❤4👎1

4 Nov 2026, 16:25 UTC≈1,400 views10 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Video

Гибкий дрон, который выдерживает столкновения и продолжает полёт Инженеры ETH Zurich представили FlexiQuad, квадрокоптер с гибкой кольцевой рамой, способный выдерживать столкновения с препятствиями и продолжать полёт. При ударе конструкция деформируется и поглощает часть энергии, защищая основные компоненты от повреждений. Дрон разгоняется до 80 км/ч, а во время испытаний выдерживал столкновения на скорости около 25…

🔥6👍4

2 Nov 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,680 views17 reactionsread 10 November 2026
Photo

Серийное производство тяжёлого грузового беспилотника HE-1A Китайская компания Huaying Aviation представила первый серийный экземпляр грузового беспилотника HE-1A. Аппарат способен перевозить до 2 тонн груза при максимальной взлётной массе 4 тонны. Беспилотник предназначен для коммерческих перевозок между городами. На предприятии оборудованы три производственные линии мощностью более 100 аппаратов в год, формируя по…

🔥8❤5👍3👏1

30 Oct 2026, 19:13 UTC≈2,110 views21 reactionsread 9 November 2026
Photo

КНДР продемонстрировала многообразие и эффективность военных беспилотников Лидер КНДР посетил выставку военной техники, где представили ударные FPV-дроны, барражирующие боеприпасы, многоцелевые беспилотники и тактические крылатые ракеты. Во время мероприятия продемонстрировали поражение условных целей. Ким Чен Ын призвал ускорить развитие беспилотных систем и добиться «абсолютного превосходства» в этой сфере. ✈️ По…

🔥12❤6👍2👎1

29 Oct 2026, 17:50 UTC≈1,610 views12 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

В Китае регулярно проходят соревнования по пилотированию дронов среди школьников. 24–25 октября в Тяньцзине состоялся очередной турнир, собравший более 500 участников. Юные пилоты демонстрировали мастерство управления беспилотниками, проходя трассы с кольцами и препятствиями на скорость. Победителей определяли по времени прохождения дистанции и точности пилотирования. ✈️ Подпишить в Telegram | MAX

🔥10👍2

27 Oct 2026, 17:57 UTC≈4,200 views13 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

ИИ научили FPV-дрон самостоятельно преследовать человека В сети появился пост с демонстрацией FPV-дрона, систему которого, по словам автора, помогла создать нейросеть Claude Opus 5.5. Аппарат обнаруживает человека и следует за ним без управления оператором. На видео видна 3D-карта окружения, предположительно созданная с помощью лидара. Ранее Anthropic совместно с Andon Labs исследовали возможности ИИ по автономному …

👍6❤3🔥3👏1

27 Oct 2026, 13:03 UTC≈2,970 views7 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Дрон научился преследовать человека в лесу без GPS Исследователи Университета Пердью представили автономный квадрокоптер, способный следовать за человеком в густом лесу без GPS и заранее подготовленной карты. Для навигации используется лидар Mid-360 от компании Livox, связанной с DJI. Он позволяет строить трёхмерную карту окружения, обнаруживать препятствия и прокладывать маршрут между деревьями. Если человек исчеза…

👍6🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 44 posts we hold for @skyindustry. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @skyindustry as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
11 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
41 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 6 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Беспилот | БПЛА, дроны, роботы
@bes_pilot · 43,855
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Skyindustry | дроны, БПЛА, FPV --o===[|]===o--” (@skyindustry), 11,866 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skyindustry.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.