Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -2,304. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 13,354–16,361 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
19 Sept 2026, 09:19
13,710
+9
16 Sept 2026, 22:37
13,701
-75
15 Sept 2026, 00:00
13,776
-72
13 Sept 2026, 09:38
13,848
-64
11 Sept 2026, 15:58
13,912
+24
8 Sept 2026, 23:20
13,888
-99
5 Sept 2026, 15:20
13,987
-29
3 Sept 2026, 19:17
14,016
-82
2 Sept 2026, 07:46
14,098
-162
1 Sept 2026, 09:54
14,260
-119
31 Aug 2026, 12:03
14,379
-51
30 Aug 2026, 13:02
14,430
-25
29 Aug 2026, 13:43
14,455
-38
28 Aug 2026, 13:28
14,493
-27
27 Aug 2026, 09:58
14,520
-15
26 Aug 2026, 10:06
14,535
-59
25 Aug 2026, 12:53
14,594
-141
24 Aug 2026, 12:07
14,735
-30
22 Aug 2026, 22:34
14,765
-46
21 Aug 2026, 11:33
14,811
first reading
Engagement
66 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.44%
avg views ÷ 13,710 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,160
17 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.19%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
17
of 66 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
66 (2 August 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
19,671
Reactions total
234
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 19:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
24s
Average length
12s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
1,079 reactions across 66 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
269
24.9%
👍
218
20.2%
❤
216
20.0%
🎉
211
19.6%
👎
75
6.95%
😁
36
3.34%
🤬
35
3.24%
💩
7
0.649%
😢
5
0.463%
🤡
3
0.278%
🤯
3
0.278%
😱
1
0.093%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 66 of the 66 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,079 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 66 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Трейдери тепер можуть заробляти бонуси з кредиток, купуючи мемкоїни на Robinhood 💳
Користувачі Robinhood Wallet і соцдодатку Fomo купують мемкоїни через Crossmint картками Visa і Mastercard, а також через Apple Pay і Google Pay — без окремої перевірки KYC.
The Block перевірив покупки й з’ясував: вони проходять як “digital goods/media”, а не як криптотранзакції. Це дозволяє отримувати бонусні бали або кешбек.
У Cha…
Співзасновник Coinbase Фред Ерсам хоче взяти під контроль три нафтові родовища у Венесуелі 🇻🇪
Йдеться про блоки Boca, Guico та Guara в нафтоносному поясі Оріноко.
Поточний оператор, Alvorada, витратив близько $30 млн, щоб знову запустити простоюючі свердловини.
Тепер у США розглядають можливе скасування цих контрактів.
Міністр енергетики США Кріс Райт їде до Каракаса, де мають показати до 17 угод у сфері нафти й …
Підозрювані у зв’язках із Lazarus Group гаманці перекинули $30 млн у крипті через Hyperliquid, свідчать дані Arkham 💸
Кошти конвертували з Bitcoin в ETH або SOL, перекинули через кілька мереж і зрештою завели на KuCoin, Kraken, LBank та невідомі сервіси на базі Tron.
Lazarus також підозрюють у рекордному зламі біржі на $1,4 млрд у 2025 році.
Crypto Skuf | Новини
Новий тренд у біткоїн-спільноті: людей вітають через блоки BTC 💍
У блоці 964 481 залишили привітання Маркусу й Елені з народженням доньки Нори — її назвали «новим життям, назавжди записаним у блокчейні».
У блоці 964 549 з’явилося ще одне поздоровлення — Айсель і Майклу побажали любові, сміху та спільних пригод. У тексті також порівняли їхнє життя з BTC: будуть злети й падіння, але врешті — справжня цінність.
Crypt…
Strategy купила ще 4 603 BTC за $369,7 млн 💸
Компанія придбала біткоїни між 24 і 30 серпня за середньою ціною $80 318 за монету.
Тепер у Strategy — 845 050 BTC на $63,73 млрд. Середня ціна покупки в портфелі — $75 412, ще $5,10 млрд компанія тримає в доларових резервах.
Crypto Skuf | Новини
Fidelity: ведмежий ринок Bitcoin уже завершився 📈
Jurrien Timmer вважає, що корекція тривала достатньо довго, щоб вважати її дном.
Crypto Skuf | Новини
Біткоїн наближається до $79 000, а Strategy знову натякає на покупку
Bitcoin відновився після п’ятничного падіння, а домінування біткоїна піднялося вище 60% 📈
Michael Saylor натякнув на першу покупку біткоїна за останні два місяці.
Crypto Skuf | Новини
JPMorgan тихо збирає криптокоманду всередині Chase — банку для 80 млн щоденних клієнтів 💳
У споживчому підрозділі банк наймає керівників до команди Digital Assets and Blockchain і каже, що хоче бути «лідером» там, де традиційні фінанси перетинаються з криптою.
Раніше CEO Джеймі Даймон називав біткоїн «шахрайством», але за останні два роки банк поступово відходить від цієї позиції.
Crypto Skuf | Новини
OpenAI припиняє партнерство з Cursor після його придбання SpaceX 🚨
Компанія заявила, що не може бути впевненою, що SpaceX використовуватиме її технології в межах умов сервісу. В OpenAI також згадали свій досвід із компаніями Ілона Маска, які нібито порушували контракти.
Прямий доступ Cursor до моделей OpenAI припиниться 12 листопада.
Crypto Skuf | Новини
XRP Ledger готують до квантових комп’ютерів 🔐
Ripple працює над оновленням XRP Ledger ще до так званого Q-Day — моменту, коли квантові комп’ютери можуть стати реальною загрозою для криптографії.
Паралельно цього тижня Bitcoin і Ethereum опублікували власні плани міграції, а модель Anthropic минулого місяця зменшила обсяг роботи для зламу одного з провідних кандидатів на постквантовий підпис у 67 мільйонів разів.
C…
🐋 Прокинулися старі BTC-кити
Понад 2504 BTC, які не рухалися 3–5 років, щойно були переміщені в блокчейні.
Схоже, довгострокові власники готуються зафіксувати прибуток.
Crypto Skuf | Новини
👎10🎉5🔥5❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 66 posts we hold for @skuf_crypto. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Skuf | Новини” (@skuf_crypto), 13,710 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skuf_crypto.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.