Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

ЭТО СКРЕПЫШ 🐸 🦋 ✨

@skrep_skrep

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,084subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001880345185
TypeChannel
Username@skrep_skrep
Created19 November 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/skrep_skrep

Growth

1,0841,0911,087.57 August 2026 — 1,091 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,091 subscribers8 August 2026 — 1,088 subscribers11 August 2026 — 1,085 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,084 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,083–1,092 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 19:061,084-1
11 Aug 2026, 16:051,085-3
8 Aug 2026, 08:001,088-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:161,091no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:051,091first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.5%
avg views ÷ 1,084 subscribers
Avg views / post
233
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.47%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held12 (5 August 20267 August 2026)
Views total2,799
Reactions total209
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 10:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

209 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6330.1%
🤣4421.1%
💯3416.3%
🌭2110.0%
😁178.13%
custom 5220095181314873601104.78%
custom 5413759083507367439104.78%
custom 521996135872386441694.31%
💔10.478%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 209reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 12 we hold a reading for · 8%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @skrep_skrep. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 08:11 UTC130 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Только что на Авито увидела объявление «шлепанцы H&M архив» Доброе утро 😄

😁113custom 52200951813148736011

6 Aug 2026, 16:48 UTC211 views29 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Реально! Тоже недавно задумалась, что та самая худоба из 90х сейчас выглядит ВПОЛНЕ СЕБЕ! Если честно, это страшно У меня еще одно видео-ессе про Ариану Гранде на очереди к просмотру……. 🔗callmekatushas

💯245

6 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC239 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У нас пополнение в бимбо-коллекции! 🔗nicolemclaughlin

15

5 Aug 2026, 21:05 UTC244 views17 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Визжу *Умоляю, сначала посмотрите видео 🔗svistunovass

🤣17

5 Aug 2026, 19:02 UTC246 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Блин, не могу остановиться это смотрееееть аааааахах

🤣7🌭4💯3

5 Aug 2026, 18:35 UTC249 views20 reactions1 Starread 7 August 2026
Video

Напомнило этот древний мем

🤣20

5 Aug 2026, 18:24 UTC249 views28 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

Кажется, это было снято для всех хейтеров, которые говорят о разладе в семье Рири и Асапа. Штош, видимо, все в порядке 👀

🌭17custom 54137590835073674397custom 52200951813148736013💔1

5 Aug 2026, 18:08 UTC244 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Да и что

custom 541375908350736743931😁1

5 Aug 2026, 17:24 UTC257 views42 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Думаю о том, чтобы пересмотреть Зену королеву воинов. Так сказать ЗАРЯДИТЬСЯ 👀👀👀 Прикиньте, вы лежите, над головой рушник, лимонад в стакане и на экране Зена, клево же???

28custom 52199613587238644168custom 52200951813148736016

5 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC266 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Просто хочу, чтобы вы знали, что на сайте Swarovski прямо сейчас можно купить Шрека и компанию. Либимое скрепышовое сочетание: кринж + истинная красота

7😁5

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @skrep_skrep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 370,204 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЭТО СКРЕПЫШ 🐸 🦋 ✨” (@skrep_skrep), 1,084 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skrep_skrep.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.