Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for СКОРборд

Channel

СКОРборд

@skorboard

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

4,504subscribers

-19 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001726705672
TypeChannel
Username@skorboard
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/skorboard

Growth

4,5044,5244,5147 August 2026 — 4,523 subscribers7 August 2026 — 4,523 subscribers8 August 2026 — 4,524 subscribers11 August 2026 — 4,519 subscribers14 August 2026 — 4,510 subscribers17 August 2026 — 4,504 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 10 days, net -19. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,501–4,527 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:474,504-6
14 Aug 2026, 13:094,510-9
11 Aug 2026, 00:514,519-5
8 Aug 2026, 06:404,524+1
7 Aug 2026, 09:314,523no change
7 Aug 2026, 09:204,523first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 3 December 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 7 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 May 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 19s
Average length
16s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,095 reactions across 16 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
42538.8%
😁29226.7%
👍12111.1%
🔥11610.6%
🤣504.57%
💯292.65%
🏆100.913%
90.822%
🎉80.731%
👏70.639%
🙏70.639%
😍50.457%
🐳40.365%
🌚30.274%
🦄30.274%
10.091%
👎10.091%
💊10.091%
🕊10.091%
😭10.091%
1 further kind10.091%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,095reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 3 December 2024 to 8 May 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 May 2025, 02:01 UTC≈8,520 views123 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🙂 Пробуем прервать проклятие Антона Кузьмичева и выпускаем вторую часть? @skorboard

😁91💯17👍87

27 Apr 2025, 00:54 UTC≈13,800 views180 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🤑 Мама, я комментировал это. @skorboard

120🔥39🤣13🐳4🦄3👍1

23 Apr 2025, 14:56 UTC≈11,900 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

1️⃣ Как бы не звучало парадоксально, но при итоговом счете 85–94 «Миннесота»проиграла именно из-за защиты. Миссматчи с Гобером — это нормальное стечение серии, но вы не можете себе позволить не иметь страхующего от прохода игрока наверху (а подобные ошибки допускали все: Эдвардс, Рэндл, ДиВинченцо — смотри на фото). Как и не можете давать сопернику за стартовую четверть 9 очков в фастбрейках, когда за весь первый ма

37👍6💯6🔥4

22 Apr 2025, 15:28 UTC≈5,140 views79 reactionsread 12 August 2026

🤑 Страдание Денвера в плей-офф: • До старта плей-офф сломался голеностопный ортез Майкла Портера, и теперь он не может подобрать себе новый, чтобы в нём было столь же удобно играть. Во втором матче Портер получил растяжение плечевого сустава и не смог сам надеть толстовку в раздевалке после игры. • Джамал Мюррей бегает первую половину матча в лонг-сливе из-за болезни (?) и все равно опекает Кавая Леонарда. Пишут пр

50👍14🔥13😍2

22 Apr 2025, 08:36 UTC≈3,870 views82 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Горячие тейки Алексея Логунова и Антона Кузьмичева перед стартом сезона. Игровой год почти подошел к концу, так что можно оценить прогнозы коллег. 📹30 горячих тейков перед стартом сезона Часть 1. 🔞 Голден Стэйт Уорриорз ❌Кузьмичев: «Голден Стэйт» не пройдут в плей-инн. Идеальное непопадание. «Уорриорз» вышли ровно в плей-инн. Впрочем, на момент записи материала никакого Батлера в «ГСВ» быть не могло и до его об

😁5813👏6👍4🤩1

21 Apr 2025, 08:08 UTC≈3,780 views43 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🤲 Саморефлексию Фреда ВанВлита и Джейлена Грина после сегодняшнего матча я представляю в двух вариантах. Кому из них больше подошла бы роль Толи Акимова решайте сами. @skorboard

🤣373👍1💊1😁1

19 Apr 2025, 19:51 UTC≈4,340 views89 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

❇️ Всех с началом плей-офф! Был рад дебютировать в постсезоне на матче со столь выдающимся перфомансом. @skorboard

😁71👍84🎉32😭1

19 Mar 2025, 18:20 UTC≈5,160 views54 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🏳Absolute cinema или победный «BANG». Запечатлел эту реакция Джея Райта в прямом эфире. Без понятия, кто в будущем сможет отпраздновать чемпионство пафоснее. Решил прогреть старт «Безумия» яркими воспоминаниями. Кстати, заходите в 04:10 на эфир в ТГ. Покажу здесь Тре Джонсона для вас. @skorboard

29🔥13🙏7😍3👍1👏1

17 Mar 2025, 17:38 UTC≈3,640 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏳 Собрал вроде сетку мечты. Плотная уверенность до «Финала Четырех» есть только в «Хьюстоне». Сильно сомневаюсь в успехах «Флориды» и «Оберна», зато высоко котирую «Кардиналс» за их защиту. Залетайте в Лигу со своими прогнозами: https://clck.ru/3Hq973 Посоревнуемся! В комментарии можно продублировать вашу сетку. @skorboard

21👍2🔥1

16 Mar 2025, 22:48 UTC≈2,920 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🏳Определены все пары первого раунда для команд россиян: 🏳«Кугарс» — «Рэмс» 🟡 🏳«Вулверинс» — «Тритонс» 🔱 🟠«Тайгерс» — «Ковбойс» 🟡 Полную сетку прикрепляю. На сегодня хватит, а то мой лимит постов на ближайшие месяцы сильно превышен. @skoroboard

32🔥15😁10👍41

16 Mar 2025, 22:14 UTC≈2,800 views53 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

🏳 MVP! MVP! Влад забрал и главную индивидуальную награду турнира. Соперника по первому раунду «Мартовского Безумия» тоже узнал — «Сан-Диего». Мягко говоря, посев — не подарок. @skorboard

35🏆10👍6😁2

16 Mar 2025, 21:42 UTC≈2,300 views46 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

25🔥97🎉5

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @skorboard. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 979,265 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“СКОРборд” (@skorboard), 4,504 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skorboard.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.