Happy New Year To All SKLINKS USERS ❤️🔥✨
❤🔥3👍3🔥1

Channel
@sklinksproofs
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
49subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001860672360 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sklinksproofs |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 24 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 7 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 7 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sklinksproofs |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 7 Oct 2026, 11:21 | 49 | -1 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 50 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:46 | 51 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 53 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 09:47 | 53 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 24 September 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 1 January 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
78 reactions across 10 posts, in 19 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 19 | 24.4% | |
| 🤣 | 16 | 20.5% | |
| 🤯 | 6 | 7.69% | |
| 🤡 | 5 | 6.41% | |
| 🥴 | 5 | 6.41% | |
| ❤🔥 | 4 | 5.13% | |
| 🎉 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 🔥 | 3 | 3.85% | |
| 🌭 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 🍓 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 😭 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 🤓 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 🤪 | 2 | 2.56% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 👻 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 😍 | 1 | 1.28% | |
| 🙏 | 1 | 1.28% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 78 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 24 September 2023 to 1 January 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Happy New Year To All SKLINKS USERS ❤️🔥✨
❤🔥3👍3🔥1
All Payments Done ✅ #SKLINKS
Payment Done ✅ #SKLINKS
Photo, posted without a caption
Sklinks is up now 👍🏻🔥
👏1
⛔️Site Is On UnderMaintenance So Wait Untill live
DEAR USERS, Some Payment’s Will Be slightly delayed For our bank limitations. So Don’t Worry About Ur Payment’s U Will get it by tomorrow ❤️🔥👍🏻 Keep Rocking With Sklinks.in #SKLINKS
🤪2👍1🔥1
✅New Shortlink with high cpm Minimum 6$ for all upto 10$ cpm ✅Only 4 page with high cpm ✅No popup ads no wrong click ✅Daily Payments ✅Minimum Payout is 5$ Only ✅ We are adsense approved ⚡️300+ view 7$ & 8 cpm and more How to work👉 📎Share your link,telegram link,youtube file & All type link accept 🔥Demo link:- https://sklinks.tech/3kcOV7ny For Any Query Dm :- @SuvaMD06 Join Channel for more updates 🔗https://t.me/…
👍1
PAYMENT DONE 👍🏻✅ #SKLINKS
❤🔥1👍1
📣Update ur traffics source otherwise ur payment will be refunded back to ur account. 🌫
📣 Withdraw Button has been opened. withdraw button will be closed by tomorrow at 6 o' clock in evening. All payments will be processed after closing the withdrawal button.🌫 Note:- Fill Your Billing Details Correctly. Like Your Banking Name or Payment Method. Note:- Clear Your Browser Cache And Cookies To Get Link Faster Without Any Issues. —— Regards Team Sklinks™ 😇
🤩2
Should we give fixed cpm to everyone’s? With daily payout’s?
🥴5👍3🎉1👻1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sklinksproofs. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Sklinks.in” (@sklinksproofs), 49 subscribers as measured 7 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sklinksproofs.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.