Channel name was changed to «berduka cita atas meninggalnya @zBiksu»
Channel
berduka cita atas meninggalnya @zBiksu
@skeLisih
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
6subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002733405990 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @skeLisih |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 9 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/skeLisih |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:05 | 6 | -1 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 16:32 | 7 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:04 | 7 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 9 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
753 reactions across 8 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤮 | 223 | 29.6% | |
| 😭 | 145 | 19.3% | |
| 👍 | 106 | 14.1% | |
| 👎 | 103 | 13.7% | |
| ❤ | 49 | 6.51% | |
| 💩 | 33 | 4.38% | |
| 🥱 | 28 | 3.72% | |
| 🤡 | 25 | 3.32% | |
| 😴 | 17 | 2.26% | |
| 🤗 | 8 | 1.06% | |
| 🖕 | 5 | 0.664% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 0.531% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 0.398% | |
| 🦄 | 3 | 0.398% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.133% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 753reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 9 September 2025 to 9 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
jangan lupa isi rnk, “ha, dimana rnk nya kak?" misalnya dia lupa kalau usn nya ke keep 😂
👎90🤮11
Signed 🐼
aku buka in comset kalau kalian mau guys. 👍 buka comset 😂 mau bobo
👍106🤮26🤡10😴8👎7🦄3❤1
Signed 🐼
mau kasih kata kata hari ini buat penipu? atau ada yang mau mengatakan sesuatu, pesan, kritik buat aku atau ke penipu nya?
Signed 🐼
btw diaini yang belum tau, aku @muqles biasa orang kenal aku "Aldi" aku disini bukan jual nama yaa guyss, mksd aku biar kalian bisa lebih percaya tentang info ini… 😭👉🏻👈🏻
Signed 🐼
kalo aku ada dana udah positif aku daget tiap hari guys
Signed 🐼
tuh guys, bagi akun dana yang ada saldo 20jt nya
🤮65😭40🤗8🤡1🥱1
Signed 🐼
aku di BA hanya sampingan ya guys, jadi tenang aja aku masih suka bagi bagi username, berbagi bot gratis, buatin base/lpm buat kalian, kalau ada yang berfikir kenapa aku ini jarang daget? jawabannya simple: egk punya dana 😭😭 aku dana pinjem guys tpi gak pernah jaspin, aku gak pernah daget bukan karena meremehkan nominal berbagi tapi memang gak ada dana
😁3🤮1
Signed 🐼
makasih yang udah bantu kalian semua baik, entah sampai sini aku bingung kalian sebaik itu ke aku, I don't have a lot of money, jadi semoga aku bisa bantu kalian dimanapun dan kapanpun itu, walaupun bukan berbentuk uang bantuanku.
❤45👎1
Signed 🐼
sebenernya aku punya langganan, dia lagi off makanya aku wtb, aku gak nyalahin langganan mksd aku disini cuman buat ngejawab isi hati kalian yang mungkin ada ucapan "kenapa gak order ke orang yang famous aja" mungkin ya guys.
Signed 🐼
yasudah lahh, udah namanya ujian mau gimana lagi, intinya kita tetap semangat karena semua manusia gak selamanya diatas gunung kalau lahirnya di permukiman dataran rendah.
Signed 🐼
walaupun urgent aku tuh sering cek dulu id nya dan sebelum ku rc saat ku cek id bukan pas setelah tf, kalo itu sama aja boong
Signed 🐼
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @skeLisih. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,179,810 of 1,345,403entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@skeLisih named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 13 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“berduka cita atas meninggalnya @zBiksu” (@skeLisih), 6 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skeLisih.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.