Channel
@skcenccoaskc
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,070subscribers
+53 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001941634654 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @skcenccoaskc |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 31 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 31 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/skcenccoaskc |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:43 | 1,070 | +29 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 1,041 | +3 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 18:14 | 1,038 | -2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:04 | 1,040 | +15 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 14:25 | 1,025 | +3 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:47 | 1,022 | +5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:05 | 1,017 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:00 | 1,017 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (2 August 2026 – 9 August 2026) |
| Views total | 63 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 01:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
برگشته میگه من اگه دوست نداشتم برنمیگشتم گفتم تو اگه دوست داشتی نمیرفتی ولم نمیکردی تنهام نمیزاشتی به هزار تا دلیل چنگ میزدی برای موندن برای داشتن من خودتو به دری میزدی تلاش میکردی صبر میکردی مرهم میشدی مداوا میکردی حتی اگه نیاز بود ولی رفتی چون زور بهونه هات از دلایلت بیشتر بود الآنم دوراتو زدی آدما رو دیدی تجربه هاتو بدست آوردی و یه دل سیر دیدی و لذت بردی ولی هم چایی سرد شده هم احساسم هم حافظم یاری نمیکنه هم ق…
Signed estifen
10 عدد آهنگ هندی که من خیلی دوستشون دارم برای شما هم گذاشتم تست کنید خوشتون اومد ریاکشن پست ها فراموش نکنید
Signed estifen
مـوزیـک ادیـت 🎧
Signed estifen
گاهی یابد ساکت بمونی و ببینی کیا واسه حرف زدن باهات تلاش میکنن همونا رو داشته باشی و نگه داری #اره_جون_تو @Khaki4K20 .
Signed estifen
بی منعفت که میشیم بی معرفت میشید ! گرفتاری بهونه ست .... باید براتون بصرفیم که باهامون رفاقت کنیم #اره_نمیری_تو_سرت_سلامت @Khaki4K20 .
Signed estifen
از میان همه چیزا که از دست دادیم بیشتر از همه دلمون برای خودمون تنگ شده #درسته #اره_جون_تو @Khaki4K20 .
Signed estifen
سرم تو کار خودمه علاقه ای به زندگی بقیه ندارم و پیگر داستانی جز داستان زندگی خودم نیستم انرژیمو برای حرف زدن راجع به آدما و سر کشیدن تو زندگیشون حروم نمیکنم و ترجیح میدم همونو صرف چیزای مهم تری بکنم خیلی وقته سرگرم هدفها و ساختن زندگی خودمم بخش زیادی آرامشی که امروز دارمو مدیون همین اخلاقم #اره_جون_تو @Khaki4K20 .
Signed estifen
خیلی خسته ام حوصله توضیح دادن نیست شما بد برداشت کنید #اره_جون_تو @Khaki4K20 .
Signed estifen
Posted without readable text
Signed estifen
این متن حتمن ذخیره کن پشت سر توام حرف میزنن غیبت رو میکنن بَدت تو میگن هزار دستان برات میسازن اما تو نگران نباش اینا میخوان تو بد قصه باشی میدونی چرا ؟ چون یا میخواستن باهات باشن و تو راه ندادی یا میخاستن جات باشن و خوشبختانه نتونستن #هی_زندگی @Khaki4K20 .
Signed estifen
تنهایی صمیمی تر از خودت به خودت فقط خودتی این رفاقت با خودتو یاد بگیر مغزت باید یاد بگیره که تنهایی تهدید نیست ترغیب به بهتر بودن با خودت یادت نره قیمت تنهاییت بسیار بالاست دقت کن به چه کسی میخوای نزدیک بشی هرکسی تو خلوتت راه ندی سکوت تو اینقدر ارزش داره کسی اجازه داره بیاد سکوتت رو درهم بشکنه و حرف بزنه که ارزش کلامش اینقدر بزاره روی ارزش سکوت تو بنابراین درقلبت رو بر روی هر کسی باز نکن #اره @Khaki4K20 …
Signed estifen
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @skcenccoaskc. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,183,103 of 1,629,403 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“جٰـام شَـرابـّم🍾” (@skcenccoaskc), 1,070 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skcenccoaskc.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.