Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ^𝓈𝓀𝒶𝓇𝒾^

Channel

^𝓈𝓀𝒶𝓇𝒾^

@skarriiio

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

201subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735378054
TypeChannel
Username@skarriiio
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/skarriiio

Growth

2019 Aug 2026, 05:18 — 201 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 18:14 — 201 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 05:189 Aug 2026, 18:14
2 measurements taken within a single day. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 200–202 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 18:14201no change
9 Aug 2026, 05:18201first reading

Engagement

11 posts held, back to 11 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
56.9%
avg views ÷ 201 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
33.5%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 11 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 August 2026
Posts held11 (11 July 20266 August 2026)
Views total915
Reactions total220
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 05:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
16s
Average length
8s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

257 reactions across 8 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 12.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52379494033140061153112.1%
custom 52696246410931351732911.3%
custom 54271479096132652732610.1%
custom 5467514262823913701259.73%
custom 5427243330901680034238.95%
custom 5427086023429496506197.39%
custom 5267456550192046754187.00%
custom 5316817664432161893166.23%
custom 5427272510909487489166.23%
custom 5426964505919792226155.84%
custom 519510605226942703683.11%
custom 533057255060069746983.11%
custom 533003533609131140672.72%
custom 533006284106187449462.33%
custom 542726532972416704741.56%
custom 519317645231235577831.17%
custom 532118958036223876020.778%
custom 522227183208578002510.389%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 257reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC36 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @cEFhtUE1Rp5hOWUyPhoto

Ой а у меня день рождения прикиньте

custom 54272433309016800345custom 54270860234294965062

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

5 Aug 2026, 21:08 UTC74 views35 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

С др нашу любимую Яночку 💐💐 https://t.me/cEFhtUE1Rp5hOWUy Все поздравляем 🌟

custom 542724333090168003413custom 54272725109094874899custom 54271479096132652738custom 54269645059197922263custom 54270860234294965062

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

2 Aug 2026, 19:34 UTC185 views56 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 542708602342949650615custom 542714790961326527315custom 542696450591979222612custom 54272725109094874896custom 54272433309016800345custom 54272653297241670473

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

2 Aug 2026, 18:20 UTC104 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @pivocosplayVideo message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 54271479096132652732custom 54272653297241670471custom 54272725109094874891

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

2 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC111 views33 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Что-то сегодня было🤩

custom 526745655019204675413custom 52696246410931351739custom 51951060522694270366custom 53211895803622387602custom 51931764523123557781custom 54271479096132652731custom 54675142628239137011

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

29 Jul 2026, 13:47 UTC131 viewsread 9 August 2026

Давайте 67 реакций

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

28 Jul 2026, 20:10 UTC147 views85 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 523794940331400611531custom 546751426282391370124custom 526962464109313517320custom 52674565501920467545custom 51931764523123557782custom 51951060522694270362custom 52222718320857800251

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

12 Jul 2026, 09:27 UTC229 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Вот и пришло время Сейчас у меня абсолютно нет сил,нервов и времени на косплей. Ужасная ситуация в стране, работа, поступление и много чего ещё происходит в моей жизни Я временно забрасываю свою косплей деятельность. Оттдаю все заказы что у меня есть сейчас и начинаю продавать костюмы, денюжки сейчас нужны. Пока этот канал будет без актива, иногда буду появляться тут https://t.me/+PZjPkeCoZeE0MGUy После переезда

custom 531681766443216189316

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

11 Jul 2026, 06:56 UTC203 views21 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Video

Я абсолютно выпала из жизни, простите меня пожалуйста 😭 Наконец-то выбрали победителей 1️⃣место. 22 2️⃣место. 11 3️⃣место. 12 просьба всех написать мне в лс: @moxmox_x так же скоро выпущу небольшой пост разговор 🌟

custom 53305725506006974698custom 53300353360913114067custom 53300628410618744946

Signed ⚞𝆊𝕊𝆊𝕜𝆊𝆊𝕒𝆊𝕣𝕚⊰

Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @skarriiio. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 635,931 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“^𝓈𝓀𝒶𝓇𝒾^” (@skarriiio), 201 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/skarriiio.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.