3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -5. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,612–3,619 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Aug 2026, 07:25
3,613
-5
7 Aug 2026, 13:18
3,618
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:00
3,618
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.32%
avg views ÷ 3,613 subscribers
Avg views / post
337
28 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.21%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 16 of 28 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
28 (5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
9,425
Reactions total
65
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 22:59 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
5m 22s
Average length
1m 47s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
65 reactions across 15 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.0% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
26
40.0%
🔥
17
26.2%
👍
16
24.6%
🫡
6
9.23%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 65reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#متابعات
عضو المكتب السياسي لأنصار الله حسين العزي :
- نوايا صنعاء زاخرة بالخير والحرص عل السلام بدليل صبرها القياسي إزاء كل العدوانية المستمرة
وترشيدها لرد فعلها إلى حد الآن مع ذلك يخفق الخصوم والمجتمع الدولي في التقاط هذه الحقيقة
- من المهم للغاية إظهار القدر الكافي من الإحترام لقيم صنعاء ومطالبها العادلة والداعمة للسلام قبل فوات الأوان
#متابعات
عضو المكتب السياسي لأنصار الله حسين العزي :
عندما نقول شعبنا محاصر من قبل دول معادية فيجب على كل مرتزق أن يكفينا شره وأن لايتدخل بيننا وبين الخارج الذي يحاصرنا
لقد بحت أصوات الشعب والقيادة وهم يناشدونكم أن تحترموا بلدكم وأن لاتموتوا نيابة عن الأجنبي
(لا أحد في العالم يصفق لدول تقصف بلده وتحاصر شعبه إلا أنتم وهذا عيب وخزي)
بسم الله الرحمن الرحيم
(وَلَا تَهِنُوا وَلَا تَحْزَنُوا وَأَنتُمُ الْأَعْلَوْنَ إِن كُنتُم مُّؤْمِنِينَ)
تلبية لنداء الحاج المجاهد (أبو حسن العامري)، وتجاوباً مع المواقف المشرفة من بعض القادة السياسيين الشرفاء، تقرر تأجيل الرد الذي كان مقرراً هذا اليوم، الثالث والعشرين من شهر صفر الخير.
وإذ نؤكد أن دماء الشهداء الزكية ما كانت ولن تكون سلعة في سوق الموازنات السياسية، فإننا ندعو من أعماهم الكرسي عن صون الدماء والسياد…
⭕️ #عاجل
#القائد_الأعلى_للقوات_المسلحة_المشير_مهدي_المشاط :
- الاتفاقيات لا تسري بأثر رجعي ومعادلة الحصار بالحصار مستمرة حتى تحقق أهدافها
- من يريد أن يشارك المعتدي السعودي في عدوانه وحصاره المستمر لـ 12 عاما فهو معتدي حتى وإن غلّف هذه المشاركة بعناوين برّاقة
- من يشارك المعتدي السعودي في عدوانه وحصاره على بلدنا فهو معتدي، والقانون اليمني حدد التعامل مع الدول المعادية
#الحصار_بالحصار
#التصعيد_بالتصعيد
#مكتب_رئا…
#فخامة_رئيس_الجمهورية_اليمنية_المشير_الركن_مهدي_المشاط : الاتفاقيات لا تسري بأثر رجعي ومعادلة الحصار بالحصار مستمرة حتى تحقق أهدافها
الجمعة، 24 صفر 1448هـ الموافق 07 أغسطس 2026
أكد فخامة المشير الركن مهدي المشاط رئيس المجلس السياسي الأعلى، أن الاتفاقيات لا تسري بأثر رجعي، ومعادلة "الحصار بالحصار" مستمرة حتى تحقق أهدافها.
وقال الرئيس المشاط في تصريح لوكالة الأنباء اليمنية (سبأ) "إن من يُريد أن يشارك المعتدي السعودي…
📹 تعليق على استهداف القوات المسلحة اليمنية لمعسكرت السعودية في مارب وحضرموت وقيام القبائل اليمنية بإكمال المهمة.
#هو_الله
#ضرب_تحشيدات_العدو_السعودي
#التصعيد_بالتصعيد
#محمد_البخيتي
🔵 #عاجل
رئيس وكالة الأنباء اليمنية سبأ "نصر الدين عامر" :
- لا صحة للادعاءات التي تتحدث عن قطع خدمة الاتصال أو الإنترنت عن أي منطقة من قبل الاتصالات في #صنعاء
- إذا كان هناك أي انقطاع لخدمة الاتصال أو الإنترنت فهو من قبل العدو السعودي وأدواته.
🔥5
Signed ツ
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @sjoeu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,027,202 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
زوامل أنصار الله الرسمية @ZawamlAnsarallah · 135,082 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
تعلم الانجليزية بسهوله Just English @English704 · 234,490 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“شبكة النبأ الاخبارية” (@sjoeu), 3,613 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sjoeu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.