Channel
@siyasi_analiz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
57subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001469085767 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @siyasi_analiz |
| Created | 18 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/siyasi_analiz |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 24 Aug 2026, 04:54 | 57 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 06:16 | 58 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:59 | 58 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 25 August 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 September 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
2 reactions across 1 post, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2021 to 9 September 2021, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Allah-təalanın insanlıq üçün qoyduğu qanunlar Qiyamətə qədər öz aktuallığını qoruyacaq. Əziz Peyğəmbərimizin (salləllahu ələyhi və alihi və səlləm) zamanında ümmətin etdiyi günahlar, O Həzrəti narahat etdiyi kimi, bu gün edilən günahlar da Zəmanə Sahibini (əccələllahu təala fərəcəhuşşərif) narahat edir. Bəli, həmin gühanlardan biri də hicabsızlıqdır…
👍2
File, posted without a caption
🔖Kim pis bir işi bəyənərsə, ona şərik olmuş olar. 📝İmam Muhəmməd Təqi (ə) 📌 @liqaullahh
Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei'nin "Mən və Kitab" adlı kitabından olan paylaşımları necə qiymətləndirirsiniz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔖 Kitab oxumaq yemək, yatmaq və digər gündəlik işlər kimi insanların həyatına daxil olmalıdır. 📝 Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei 📌 @liqaullahh
🔖 Bizim evdə təxminən hamı gecə mütaliə halında yuxuya gedir. Mən özümdə eləyəm. Əlbəttə, kitab oxuya-oxuya yuxuya getmirəm, yuxum gələnə kimi mütaliə edirəm, sonra kitabı kənara qoyub yatıram. Bizdə evdə hamı belədir. Məncə, bütün ... ailələr belə olmalıdır. Mən belə gözləyirəm... 📝 Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei 📌 @liqaullahh
🔖 Gənclər hansısa filmin başlamasından əvvəl oturub 20 dəqiqə, ya yarım saat reklamlara baxmağa razı olurlar, amma həmin 20 dəqiqədə roman oxumağa razı olmurlar. Hələ mən ictimai, siyasi, ya elmi kitab oxumalarını demirəm. 📝 Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei 📌 @liqaullahh
🔖 Gəlin, sizdə elə iş görün ki, kitab həyatın zəruri ləvazimatlarından birinə çevrilsin. 📝 Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei 📌 @liqaullahh
🔖 Bizim cəmiyyətdə hələ ki, gedib kitab alıb oxumaq və sonra onu oxumaları üçün dostlara və ya övladlara vermək ənənəsi adət halını almayıb. 📝 Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei 📌 @liqaullahh
🔖 Kitab oxumamaq böyük nöqsandır. Biz bu nöqsanı aradan qaldırmalıyıq. 📝 Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei 📌 @liqaullahh
🔖 Gərək kitab cibdə olsun və avtobus, taksi, klinika, idarə və mağaza kimi yerlərdə insan harada bikar oldusa, kitab oxusun, mağazada müştəri olmayanda, evdə boş olanda götürüb kitab oxusun. 📝 Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei 📌 @liqaullahh
🔖 Mənim sözüm budur ki, gənclər, qocalar, kişilər, qadınlar, şəhərlilər, kəndlilər, bir sözlə, hamı kitabla ünsiyyətdə ola bilər. 📝 Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei 📌 @liqaullahh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @siyasi_analiz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Ayətullah Seyyid Əli Xamenei'nin "Mən və Kitab" adlı kitabından olan paylaşımları necə qiymətləndirirsiniz?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Ayətullah Cəfər Sübhaninin "Necə Uğur Qazanmalı" adlı kitabından olan paylaşımları bəyəndinizmi?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 25 August 2021 to 9 September 2021. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@siyasi_analiz named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Liqaullah” (@siyasi_analiz), 57 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/siyasi_analiz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.