Channel
@sipmpleng
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
42subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001236611546 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sipmpleng |
| Description | Бесплатный тренажер для любого уровня Английского языка! Долой скучные правила! Ежедневно в легкой форме выдаем основы современного английского языка! |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 7 July 2020— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sipmpleng |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 17:02 | 42 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:35 | 42 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 13 July 2020. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? If you <…> some breakfast, you wouldn't be so hungry right now
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧿 Как вежливо прервать собеседника Иногда в ходе диалога у нас возникает срочная необходимость вставить свою реплику, когда собеседник очевидно неправильно понял вашу мысль, и вам очень хочется его поправить. Также бывает нужно срочно завершить беседу, поскольку началась официальная часть того или иного мероприятия, или к вам подъезжает такси. В любом случае, прерывать собеседника нужно максимально вежливо. Следующи…
✍️ Сленг в письменном общении: NO1 - никто (no one) NE1 - кто-нибудь (anyone) 4eva - навсегда (forever) soz - огорченный (sorry) 2moz / tomoz / 2moro - завтра (tomorrow) 2NITE - сегодня вечером (tonight) TX - спасибо (thanks) 2dA - сегодня (today) addy - адрес (аddress) sez - скажет (says) cuz / bcuz / bcz / bcos / bc / coz / bcoz - потому что (because)
📗 А вы знали? Есть специальное название для слов, в которых ни одна буква не повторяется. Такие слова называются “isogram” (изограмма). Изограмма – слово или словосочетание, в котором ни одна буква не повторяется. Например, слово “dialogue” это изограмма.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? You <…> this ring for me. It’s too expensive!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? I thought I’d drop <…> for a cup of tea on my way home
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎯 Словарный запас: Современный английский сленг: You are on thin ice - ты вот-вот переступишь грань дозволенного. Похоже на русское «ходить по лезвию (острию) ножа»
📗 А вы знали? Самое употребительное английское прилагательное – “good”. Разные источники дают разные списки наиболее употребительных английских слов, но “good” в любом из них стоит на первых позициях. Сайт Syllable Count ставит его на первое место. С другой стороны, на сайте Word Frequency Data оно располагается после “other” и “new”.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? <…> weather was awful last summer.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🎯 Словарный запас: Call it a day! - забудь об этом, покончим с этим, выкинь из головы Don’t worry about the dress you’ve stained. Call it a day, we’ll buy a new one! Не беспокойся о платье, которое ты испачкала. Выкинь из головы, купим еще одно!
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? If I had one million dollars, I <…> money to a charity
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? There must be some <…> — I definitely ordered a smaller size
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sipmpleng. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 most recent of 9 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? If you <…> some breakfast, you wouldn't be so hungry right now
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? You <…> this ring for me. It’s too expensive!
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? I thought I’d drop <…> for a cup of tea on my way home
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? <…> weather was awful last summer.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? If I had one million dollars, I <…> money to a charity
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🧩 Какого слова не хватает? There must be some <…> — I definitely ordered a smaller size
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2020 to 13 July 2020. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 1,036,695 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Simple English” (@sipmpleng), 42 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sipmpleng.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.