Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Синие занавески

Channel

Синие занавески

@siniezanaveski

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

692subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001129584054
TypeChannel
Username@siniezanaveski
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 October 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/siniezanaveski

Topic

Literature — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 29 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

692695693.56 August 2026 — 695 subscribers6 August 2026 — 695 subscribers13 August 2026 — 694 subscribers28 September 2026 — 693 subscribers8 October 2026 — 692 subscribers6 August 20268 October 2026
5 measurements spanning 64 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 692–695 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Oct 2026, 23:56692-1
28 Sept 2026, 23:42693-1
13 Aug 2026, 00:05694-1
6 Aug 2026, 16:37695no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:51695first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 4 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

202 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥12059.4%
👍6130.2%
💔2110.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 202 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
255
across the posts below
Posts paid on
14
of 17 we hold a reading for · 82%
Most on one post
101
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @siniezanaveski. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 February 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 14:02 UTC155 views15 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Кадзуо Исигуро «Клара и Солнце» (2021) После романа «Погребенный великан» я точно знал, что вернусь к автору еще, а тут так удачно совпало — места в дорожном рюкзаке оставалось ровно на что-то драматическое и про роботов, страниц на 340–342. В современной японской литературе есть отчетливый тренд на комфортные книги, в которых нет эволюции характеров, нераспутывающихся узлов, фатальных исходов, а только временные т…

🔥8👍7

22 Jun 2026, 07:06 UTC322 views29 reactions55 Starsread 6 August 2026

Томас Пинчон “Радуга тяготения” (1973) После “Выкрикивается лот 49” Пинчона больше не хотелось читать вообще. Тогда я думал попробовать автора в лайтовом режиме, зайти до колена в холодную воду, но тактика оказалась ошибочной. “Лот” написан вообще в другом настроении, почти другим человеком. В Пинчона нужно врываться с вышки: браться сразу за “V” или “Радугу тяготения”. До конца не знаю, что меня побудило сделать ещ…

🔥25👍4

16 Jun 2026, 09:49 UTC397 views16 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Привет! Если что, я жив и легитимен, посты скоро будут, просто я пытаюсь осилить "Радугу тяготения" с комментариями и вот этим всем (ну я же обещал в начале года попробовать еще раз Пинчона). А пока давайте что-нибудь разыграем. Как насчет книги "Магазинчик психических расстройств" Виталия Михайлова — это любопытный магический реализм с порцией абсурда и отсылочек. Несмотря на серьезность тем, книга скорее легкая, т…

🔥16

16 Jun 2026, 09:48 UTC364 views9 reactions101 Starsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👍9

8 May 2026, 07:46 UTC476 views17 reactions51 Starsread 6 August 2026

Майские хороши тем, что есть время и почитать, и написать об этом. Так что сегодня убьем двух выстрелов одним зайцем. Хьюберт Селби-мл “Демон” (1976) Помнится, что покупал эту книгу под соусом “это как приквел “Американский психопат”. При этом автор более всего известен по книге “Реквием по мечте”. Гарри Уайт преуспевающий руководитель и надежда компании. Он молод, хорош собой и знает, чего хотят женщины. Ему дост…

🔥10👍7

8 May 2026, 07:45 UTC340 views3 reactions1 Starread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥2👍1

26 Apr 2026, 11:09 UTC472 views16 reactions11 Starsread 6 August 2026

Саша Филипенко «Кремулятор» (2022) 1941 год, СССР, начало войны. Кажется, что чистки остались в 37-ом, но не можешь найти врага — сотвори его. Метры в центре Москвы сами себя не получат. Кажется, что нет лучше места, чтобы спрятаться от месива по обе стороны границы, чем в царстве Аида. Герой этой истории — Петр Нестеренко, реальный человек, белый офицер, летчик, информатор, парижский таксист, директор московского …

🔥11👍5

23 Mar 2026, 05:59 UTC522 views14 reactions11 Starsread 6 August 2026

Стиг Дагерман “Змея” (1945) Первый раз змею замечают солдаты, пока сидят в засаде на учениях. Кажется, что люди с оружием не должны ничего бояться — они ведь тренируются умирать, но все идет не по плану. Голос предательски дрожит. Даже звание и авторитет командира не могут заставить наглеца убрать пойманную змею подальше. Тут как с атомной бомбой: джинн вырвался из бутылки и обратно не вернется. Змея чувствует стра…

🔥7💔5👍2

1 Mar 2026, 15:22 UTC573 views26 reactions11 Starsread 6 August 2026

Пол Линч “Благодать” (2017) Вид у Сары раздосадованный, она едва переводит дух, бледная и усталая, кожа на горле уже начала провисать, словно, чтобы носить ее красиво, нужно усилие, какого в Саре не отыщется. Я никогда ранее не читал Линча, поэтому первое впечатление от его текста было: «Это что? Уильям Блейк в прозе?». На самом деле, таких оборотов великое множество, работа со словом (и с переводом!) проделана юве…

🔥17👍9

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @siniezanaveski. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Синие занавески” (@siniezanaveski), 692 subscribers as measured 8 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/siniezanaveski.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.