Class ki Quality dekho...sirf sochte sochte selection nahi hoga...padhai pe dhyan do
❤10👍1

Channel
@simplimathsofficial
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
8,346subscribers
+2,339 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002617367589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @simplimathsofficial |
| Description | Here I will teach you exactly what is required for your selection. No unnecessary drama. If you're non-hindi speaking student, then do join my another channel SSC MONK: https://t.me/sscmonkofficial For Course related queries, only whatsapp at 8733080078 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/simplimathsofficial |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @simplicrackwithalok/289230 Jul 2026, 06:17 UTC | @simplimathsofficial/311 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 06:18 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @simplimathsofficial/313 · this entry30 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC | @simplicrackwithalok/289330 Jul 2026, 13:40 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @simplimathsofficial/334 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 10:19 UTC | @simplicrackwithalok/29088 Aug 2026, 10:20 UTC | 1.00 | under a minute |
| @simplimathsofficial/362 · this entry20 Aug 2026, 03:43 UTC | @simplicrackwithalok/294420 Aug 2026, 03:53 UTC | 1.00 | 10 minutes |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @simplicrackwithalok | 5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 1.00 | under a minute | this entry (4–1) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 1 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 49 comparable posts for this entry, running 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 09:08 | 8,346 | -43 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 13:18 | 8,389 | -59 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 12:16 | 8,448 | -17 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 13:09 | 8,465 | -19 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 13:17 | 8,484 | +1 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:08 | 8,483 | +16 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 18:46 | 8,467 | +33 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 11:15 | 8,434 | +41 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 01:37 | 8,393 | +10 |
| 12 Oct 2026, 17:44 | 8,383 | -14 |
| 6 Oct 2026, 03:18 | 8,397 | +51 |
| 28 Sept 2026, 17:40 | 8,346 | +231 |
| 18 Sept 2026, 14:02 | 8,115 | +58 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 17:00 | 8,057 | +51 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:38 | 8,006 | +56 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 14:57 | 7,950 | +221 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 00:35 | 7,729 | +151 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:08 | 7,578 | +170 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 21:45 | 7,408 | +81 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 23:47 | 7,327 | first reading |
99 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 33 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 36 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (30 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 150,135 |
| Reactions total | 861 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Nov 2026, 01:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,166 reactions across 91 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,024 | 63.9% | |
| 🔥 | 530 | 16.7% | |
| 👍 | 218 | 6.89% | |
| 💯 | 87 | 2.75% | |
| 🫡 | 59 | 1.86% | |
| 🤣 | 58 | 1.83% | |
| 😁 | 53 | 1.67% | |
| 🙏 | 37 | 1.17% | |
| 👏 | 33 | 1.04% | |
| 🥰 | 15 | 0.474% | |
| 💋 | 11 | 0.347% | |
| 🗿 | 10 | 0.316% | |
| ⚡ | 6 | 0.19% | |
| 🤗 | 6 | 0.19% | |
| 👌 | 5 | 0.158% | |
| 👀 | 4 | 0.126% | |
| 👎 | 3 | 0.095% | |
| 🕊 | 3 | 0.095% | |
| 🤯 | 2 | 0.063% | |
| 😘 | 1 | 0.032% | |
| 1 further kind | 1 | 0.032% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 94 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,166 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 36 posts held from the last 30 days (27.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Class ki Quality dekho...sirf sochte sochte selection nahi hoga...padhai pe dhyan do
❤10👍1
A man is nothing without his character. Sharam gayi tel lene😆
😁38❤5🤣3
https://youtu.be/qw0pTtTiKq0?si=hpdYkHp6ShRTR075 PROBABILITY CLASS
🔥5
Bada pyarasa class bani hai Probability ka... 6PM pe milte hai Simplicrack Math YT Channel pe... Agr First Time Probability Padh rahe ho ya fir Probability me underconfident rehte ho toh Probability iss class ke baad ek dum aasan lagega...
🔥28❤4👍1🥰1
Good Morning everyone! Kal Probability ka Class aayega.. And then Regularly Math Prep chalega Mains ke liye.
👍30❤4
Kal mere Dost ne kuch aise bataya jo tumhe sunna bada jaruri hai: Bhai Galti ho kaha rahi hai? Mehnat karta hu toh Sabar wale fal le jaate hai. Sabar Karta h toh Mehnat wale fal le jaate hai. Aag lagi padi hai. Roj new new tarike se aag lagi padi hai. Aur toh Aur Kismat Position hi change nahi kar rahi. Kuch words mujhe yaha cut karke likhna pada. Sare Ladke samjhenge 😂😂 Thoda has v lena
🤣47😁4❤1
Mere sare chote bhai beheno ko Happy Diwali... Aaj ke din kuch mat socho, padhna nahi hai aaj... Jo v ho aaj enjoy karo... Koi gila sikwa nahi aaj... Khulke enjoy karo... Saath firse start karenge, aur Agle Diwali Tak itni mehnat karenge ki Selection ke Saath next Diwali sab manayenge. Happy Diwali and Love you all 3000
❤29🥰2
Agr apni bhalai chahte ho toh ye kuch log Hai jinko tamasha karne me Maja aata Hai padhane se jyada unse dur raho. Be selfish. Tumhe wo channel ya wo teacher ko follow Karni Hai Jo Apne subject ko har baar innovative way me padha Raha ho...nahi color karke same chiz baar baar bech Rahe hai.... Inn logo ka kaam Hai ek dusre pe thukna fir saath baith ke Khana...dur raho aise logo se.....Tumhare liye tumhare selection…
❤34🔥1
Kisiko kuch nahi aata, Balke, Sabka waqt aata Hai. Aur fir jiska waqt aata Hai, Usse sab aata Hai. Wo jaise ek sher Tha, Waqt aane par Bataunga sabko Lehze yaad Hai Mujhe sabke.
🔥54❤15⚡1🗿1
Ye sabke alawa v SS Maine share Kia dusre telegram channel pe v. Bahut sare Bache 39+ maths me score kiye... Section timer ka saath ye easy nahi Tha fir v bahut Acha score Hai. Me samjhta Hai...kuch students ke score as expected nahi aaya...aisa lag Raha hoga kab ye sab khatam hoga kab failure se picha chutega? Unfortunately, hum jaiso ke saath Bina successful hone ke hamare koi value nahi h. Ghar wale, Rishtedaar,…
❤37👎2🫡1
50/50 in MATH.....Outstanding Prince 🔥🔥🔥 Total 158.5
🔥14👀4❤1
Proud of each one of yours effort 🫂 169,163,158, 154.5,152.5, 151,148,147.5 Who is next 👀⁉️
❤6
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @simplimathsofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
We recorded 5 posts on @simplimathsofficial as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
How many Questions are you attempting correctly in Math section under 15 minutes? Because I am thinking of something and your insights will help me create this better for all of you.
The shares total 107%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 12 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Simplicrack Math” (@simplimathsofficial), 8,346 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/simplimathsofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.