Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Keep it simple, stupid!

@simplestupid

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,509subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001291507339
TypeChannel
Username@simplestupid
Created4 November 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/simplestupid

Growth

2,5092,5162,512.56 August 2026 — 2,516 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,516 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,515 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,513 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,509 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,508–2,517 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 22:152,509-4
9 Aug 2026, 17:012,513-2
6 Aug 2026, 21:512,515-1
6 Aug 2026, 05:332,516no change
6 Aug 2026, 05:272,516first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 6 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
21.1%
avg views ÷ 2,509 subscribers
Avg views / post
528
13 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.989%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
13
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 8 of 13 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 August 2026
Posts held20 (6 July 20263 August 2026)
Views total6,870
Reactions total43
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 16:26 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

67 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2740.3%
🤣1217.9%
👍913.4%
🦄913.4%
💯710.4%
🍌11.49%
🔥11.49%
🤯11.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 67reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC280 viewsread 7 August 2026

Всё забываю написать, что починил бота @FeedRiverBot, с помощью которого можно получать посты из RSS к себе в канал или чат. Старый питоновский код заменён на воркер в Cloudflare, в логи которого я иногда смотрю и стараюсь чинить самые массовые проблемы. К сожалению, куча сайтов закрывают свои RSS от ботов. И ладно бы ещё user agent или что-то легко решаемое, но они уже научились блокировать по диапазонам IP-адресо

2 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC362 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Я не слушал, а читал транскрипт, но в первой минуте уже больше смысла, чем во всём, что я слышал от разных CPO за год или два. Hiring so many PMs infantilizes the engineers and the designers who are perfectly capable of making good decisions, but just never had to because there was always a PM to babysit them. The only argument for why you would want product management to be a specialist function is really it's a

4💯4👍1

1 Aug 2026, 19:49 UTC394 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Короткое погружение в мир батареек.

🔥1

1 Aug 2026, 09:06 UTC422 viewsread 7 August 2026

Нетфликс, видимо, настолько забронзовел, что вот теперь такое случается. Для компании, которая занимается тем, что постоянно получает, отсматривает и публикует контент -- 💩. Не справились с контент менеджментом, получается.

28 Jul 2026, 12:35 UTC589 viewsread 7 August 2026

А вот и вторая часть подъехала. Тоже крайне рекомендую.

28 Jul 2026, 07:28 UTC547 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Смешная история про эффективность. У моего Samsung Fold 7 как-то совсем неэстетично износился корпус. Так называемый Advanced Armor Aluminum местами почернел и стёрся, из-за чего телефон стал выглядеть как будто бы его били. С Fold 6, у которого такой же AAA корпус, было то же самое – такая вот реакция на ношение без чехла, потные руки и т.п. По гарантии менять корпус отказались. Наверное, можно было бы поспорить,

👍7🦄53

24 Jul 2026, 09:33 UTC584 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кроме инвесторских денег на покупку токенов, у нормальной компании должна быть регулярно обновляемая в соответствии с обстоятельствами reward function. Если культура это то, за что здесь в моменте хвалят или наказывают, повышают или понижают, вознаграждают или штрафуют, принимают или отторгают, то это вот она и есть, reward function. Claude мне сказал, что в первом абзаце неудачное перечисление двух совершенно несв

🤣5🍌1

20 Jul 2026, 15:18 UTC663 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Довольно интересно написано про нюансы построения "железного" стартапа в Штатах.

2

18 Jul 2026, 09:04 UTC633 viewsread 7 August 2026

Довольно забавная история про то, как активист пытался остановить подписание Гуглом каких-то там контрактов с американскими военными.

17 Jul 2026, 08:44 UTC669 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026

В продолжение темы: Starting July 7, 2026, every new car sold in the European Union must include a driver monitoring camera aimed at your face. Glance at your phone, your kids in the back seat, or the radio for too long, and the car will flash a warning light and sound an alert.

1

17 Jul 2026, 08:21 UTC598 viewsread 7 August 2026

Дальше, естественно, будет только хуже, но веселее.

17 Jul 2026, 07:24 UTC560 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026

OpenAI явно хочет стать лидером по количеству попыток. Как и в случае с Sora, браузер Atlas я даже ещё посмотреть не успел -- а уже, получается, и не надо. Сейчас у OpenAI будет период запуска и ликвидации бесполезных клавиатур, колонок и телефонов (за то, как они сделают телефон, Apple их в суде, конечно, накажет больно). Думаю, до конца 2026 года они уже с этим наиграются и забудут. Тут было бы не чуть менее сме

💯3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @simplestupid. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 986,669 of 1,189,255entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Keep it simple, stupid!” (@simplestupid), 2,509 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/simplestupid.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.