Channel
@silverfoam
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
21subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002577767350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @silverfoam |
| Description | Ничё я не пропагандирую и вообще я не лес я роща ‼️публикуемый контент предназначен для совершеннолетних дев‼️ Гиноцентрик-сейф-спейс,no m*n allowed Для анон связи— @Silverfoambot ,для прямой—лс канала |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/silverfoam |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 | 21 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 21 | first reading |
11 posts held, back to 11 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 11 (11 April 2026 – 22 July 2026) |
| Views total | 48 |
| Reactions total | 9 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 11 Aug 2026, 14:47 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
59 reactions across 11 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦄 | 59 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 11 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 59reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 11 most recent posts we hold, published 11 April 2026 to 22 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Я поставила крест на телеграме, как на соц сети для радфем-каналов, но в очередной раз попытавшись дать ей шанс, потому что здесь всё ещё сидят мои любимые подруги, знакомые и лесбиянки, жизнь и судьба которых мне интересна, в итоге я без особых стараний напоролась на очередной канал полок, да ещё и с картинкой того, как же эта тупая пендосятина с привилегиями не шарят за угнетение женщин(не лесбиянок) и что вот наши…
🦄4
С лесбиюлем.
🦄5
Ещё раз кокетливо напоминаю про переезд в тумбу :З В дальнейшем только там будет такое поститься ововоа (закинула и сюда «по требованию» ахах)
🦄1
Каждой "она вэлэвэ" также посвящается↑
🦄7
В общем, дамы :) Думала долго, анализировала ощущения и пришла к решению, что тгшный канал таки останется как архив В тамблере, а тем более в радблере, мне намного лучше и спокойнее Хоть и грустно, что там нет настолько же плотной системы взаимодействий между артерками, как в тгшке(по крайней мере, именно между >артерками< я такого в тумбе не заметила, а с другими в принципе даже удобнее контачить через реблоги, их х…
🦄6
Давайте опустим тот факт, что этот тренд уже неактуален 🙌
🦄9
Картинка красивая и история с поста очень важная Всем женщинам и лесбиянкам счастливой жизни без ебливого патриархата🙏
🦄9
#art@maslyva афигеть ого это что ЦВЕТНОЙ АРТ 🤩 Кхмм у нас это называют thư ngỏ, но мне лениво на русском переводить, так что вы просто читайте текст: Больно часто натыкаюсь на тейк (да и в целом люди часто спрашивают) почему я сделала Саву из мужчину в транс-мейла, а из транс-мейла в женщину; Почему я из фурри порно художника транс-френдли персоны с местоимением зей зем, хотевшая стать мужчиной, стала радфем худож…
🦄6
#fatartday на конец то движ для меня
🦄3
😴😴
🦄5
чут-чут глупости сюда, извините... (на самом деле она что-то вроде инженерки, так что не верьте ей)
🦄4
Showing the 11 most recent of 11 posts we hold for @silverfoam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,045,728 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ASTROPEONY⚢⁺¹⁸” (@silverfoam), 21 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/silverfoam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.