Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Зверь и Папоротникъ🌿

Channel

Зверь и Папоротникъ🌿

@silferrre

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

104subscribers

+1 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001653412609
TypeChannel
Username@silferrre
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/silferrre

Growth

103104103.510 Aug 2026, 12:01 — 103 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:43 — 104 subscribers10 Aug 2026, 12:0111 Aug 2026, 11:43
2 measurements taken within a single day, net +1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 103–104 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 11:43104+1
10 Aug 2026, 12:01103first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 4 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.1%
avg views ÷ 104 subscribers
Avg views / post
50.0
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
33.0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 12 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held12 (4 June 202627 July 2026)
Views total100
Reactions total33
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken10 Aug 2026, 12:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

130 reactions across 11 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
5844.6%
❤‍🔥2519.2%
🍌1511.5%
💔86.15%
😢75.38%
🙏64.62%
🔥43.08%
😍43.08%
🦄21.54%
👍10.769%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 130reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

26 Jul 2026, 20:50 UTC54 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Ой, спойлер случайно упал😳 Как думаете, доставка из Крыма сейчас работает нормально? А то есть у меня небольшие опасения...)

11🍌1

6 Jul 2026, 14:53 UTC97 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Народ!! Очень извиняюсь, что так поздно предупреждаю, но в связи с последними событиями и сложностью попыток добраться до другого города я поняла решение не продлевать аренду в севастопольской Твоей полке. Мой постой там стал весьма приятным опытом и расставаться жаль, но на данный момент минусов стало очень много. Если вы хотите приобрести кого-то из моих ребят, есть время до 13:00 завтрашнего дня. Если нет — ищите

💔8😢32🍌1

5 Jul 2026, 14:45 UTC71 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Жду ещё пару часиков, но кажется мне, что результат уже понятен🤔

🙏31

3 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTC84 viewsread 10 August 2026
Poll

Как поступим?

  1. Выбираем, как будет выглядеть приз, все вместе35%
  2. Что будет, то будет (на выбор мастера)65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

3 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC81 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Итак! Я думаю, время настало очень давно, но опоздания — неотъемлемая черта характера моего персонажа, так что... Лотерея, ребят! Провожу я такое в первый раз, а потому есть предложение. Как вы смотрите на то, чтобы выбрать формат будущего приза, его внешний вид и детали совместно?

🍌5👍1

29 Jun 2026, 20:34 UTC85 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Показываю несколько ребят из недавнего. Пока нахожусь в рабочих завалах, но очень надеюсь , что в скором времени получится почаще возвращаться к творчеству 🫠

❤‍🔥75🍌1

23 Jun 2026, 17:00 UTC110 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

(ещё пара рабочих фоточек)

❤‍🔥81🍌1

23 Jun 2026, 16:59 UTC72 views12 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Предлагаю заценить сегодня вот этого пирожочка. Провоцирует меня оформить небольшую растительную серию)

10🍌2

16 Jun 2026, 11:05 UTC76 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Зарабатываю пердечный сриступ с помощью двух часов сна и необоснованных трат на бодрящие жижевы (с этой поездки в Севастополь я ничего не заработаю)

😢4🙏3🍌1

4 Jun 2026, 11:42 UTC119 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Заказной пупс, уже дома, чему я очень рада🫶

7❤‍🔥3🍌2🦄2

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @silferrre. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Jul 2026, 11:25 UTCFinal Results23 voters

Как поступим?

  1. Выбираем, как будет выглядеть приз, все вместе35%
  2. Что будет, то будет (на выбор мастера)65%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,343,313 of 1,548,671entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Зверь и Папоротникъ🌿” (@silferrre), 104 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/silferrre.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.