وجاني ذا كمان وكان مكتوب نصا no signs of inflammation no signs of peritonitis

Channel
Silent, September 💥
@silent_2026_2027
On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
59,846subscribers
+222 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001508110216 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @silent_2026_2027 |
| Description | @Silent_IV |
| Created | Between 1 July 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 33 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/silent_2026_2027 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 62% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Previous handles
@silent_2026_2027 was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.
held 7 August 2026 – 7 August 2026
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 12:59 | 59,846 | +8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 11:41 | 59,838 | -31 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 18:38 | 59,869 | +15 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 23:20 | 59,854 | +6 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 14:02 | 59,848 | +81 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 59,767 | -11 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 22:18 | 59,778 | +18 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:27 | 59,760 | +21 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 09:49 | 59,739 | -12 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 09:57 | 59,751 | -6 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 07:17 | 59,757 | +56 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:58 | 59,701 | +8 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 59,693 | -21 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:38 | 59,714 | -34 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 05:12 | 59,748 | -20 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 59,768 | no change |
| 25 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 59,768 | +59,765 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 03:56 | 3 | -59,768 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 23:19 | 59,771 | +50 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 05:06 | 59,721 | first reading |
Engagement
924 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 78 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 1.55%
- avg views ÷ 59,846 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 928
- 551 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.64%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 553
- of 924 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 380 of 551 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 924 (5 August 2026 – 22 September 2026) |
| Views total | 511,325 |
| Reactions total | 2,778 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 22 Sept 2026, 02:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- ≈19,500
- Videos
- ≈16
- Links
- ≈868
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
- Video runtime
- 10s
- Average length
- 10s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
3,235 reactions across 496 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 902 | 27.9% | |
| 🙏 | 696 | 21.5% | |
| 🔥 | 577 | 17.8% | |
| 👏 | 482 | 14.9% | |
| 🎉 | 184 | 5.69% | |
| 💯 | 169 | 5.22% | |
| ❤ | 140 | 4.33% | |
| ⚡ | 66 | 2.04% | |
| 🤣 | 12 | 0.371% | |
| 😭 | 5 | 0.155% | |
| 🏆 | 2 | 0.062% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 507 of the 924 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,235 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 924 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 1
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 1
- of 921 we hold a reading for · 0.1%
- Most on one post
- 1
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @silent_2026_2027. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 924 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
6 months old baby with vomiting and sausage shaped mass fever was 38.9 C most appropriate step? Child Looks ill HR >100 (Don't Remember Exact Number) A. barium enema B. surgery Answer: B. surgery I Will Treat it As Peritonitis (Although No "SOLID" Evidence) طلعته من الخاص بعد الاستجواب 😀
❤2🔥1
A 20 year old primigravida is admitted at 42 weeks gestation. Speculum exam shows a closed cervical os and placenta is posterior. The initial CTG shows fetal HR of 120-140 bpm and labor is induced using a prostaglandin pessary. An hour later, the cervix is 4 cm dilated and CTG shows fetal bradycardia 80 bpm with strong uterine contractions 3-4 times per 10 minutes. What is the most appropriate next step? A- Remove pe…
❤1👍1
A 65-year-old man, a heavy smoker, known to have hypertension and COPD on Ventolin, Anoro Ellipta (Umeclidinium bromide/vilanterol), and lisinopril, presents with worsening shortness of breath for 4 months. There has been no change in his sputum amount or purulence, and he has had no fever, PND, or orthopnea. He was not admitted to the hospital for more than a year. Examination reveals decreased breath sounds without…
❤1👍1
A 21-year-old man with a recurrent history of wheezing and exertional shortness of breath when participating in exercises presents to the Emergency Room with increasing shortness of breath after an aerobic class. Examination reveals that he is having obvious difficulty in breathing with diffuse bilateral wheezes. Which of the following is the most effective treatment to be started in the emergency? A. Intravenous cor…
❤1👍1
Patient with a gunshot wound to LUQ and the patient underwent splenectomy + distal pancreatectomy + partial colectomy 1 week ago. Now presents with abdominal distention and abdominal pain. On P/E, he has mild LUQ tenderness only. All vitals given in the scenario were stable except for 110-120 HR + 39.6°C T (I’m sure about the temp), what to do NEXT? A) US B) X-ray C) CT scan D) Exp laparotomy
❤1👍1
A 26-year-old woman was treated with methotrexate 8 days ago for ectopic pregnancy and presents to the Emergency Room with mild abdominal pain and vaginal spong. Examinaion revealed a sot and non-tender abdomen. Her BhCG results show a drop from 1200 miu/ml on Day 4 to 500 miu/ml on Day 7. Which of the following is the most appropriate next step in management? A. MRI of the pelvis B. Immediate laparoscopy C. Reassur…
👍1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤1
Child had pharyngitis 3 weeks ago. Three days ago, he developed pain and swelling in the left knee. On examination, a cardiac murmur is heard. Highset diagnostic test ? A. ESR B. ECG C. ASO titer C
❤2
A preschool child presents for his routine preschool-entry examination (see lab results). Test Result Normal Values HB 90 112-165 RDW 20 11.5-16% Platelets count 490 150-400 x 109/L MCV 68 80-95 fl MCH 26 28-33 pg/cell MCHC 241 260-340 g/L Reticulocyte 1.10.2-1.2 % WBC 7.5 4.5-10.5 x 109/1 RBC 5 4.6-4.8 x 1012/1 Which of the following is the most likely diagnosis? A. Aplastic anaemia B. Thalassemia minor C. Iron defi…
❤1
A 51-year-old woman P6+2 presents with pelvic pressure, heaviness in the lower abdomen, and heavy menstrual bleeding. Bimanual pelvic examination revealed a firm, irregular, enlarged uterus is felt (see report). Pelvic Ultrasound: A large submucous fibroid 7x8 cm in size. Which of the following is the most appropriate management? A. Myomectomy B. Hysterectomy C. Endometrial ablation D. Progesterone therapy Answer: B
❤1
A 45-year-old patient complains of recurrent episodes of upper abdominal pain for the past 2 weeks with fever. On examination, the patient is jaundiced, abdomen is soft with marked tenderness all over the abdomen (see lab results and report). Blood pressure 90/60 mmHg Heart rate 130/mın Respiratory rate 18/min Temperature 38 °C Test Result Normal Values Indirect bilirubin 5 3.2-12.1 mol/L Direct bilirubin 20 1.5-6.5 …
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 924 posts we hold for @silent_2026_2027. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@Elaf_Faisal · 34,108#1
@Saudi_SMLE_TOP10 · 42,136#2
@smlemay · 30,105#3
@SMLERide · 12,676#4
@joesrecall · 12,862#5
@thehatimsmleguide · 9,473#6
@MajeedOPHTHA · 12,325#7
@SMLEwithGHADI · 8,893#8
@examsy · 15,941#9
@fairdaily · 29,092#10
@smlebrain · 18,998#11
@acedecmber · 6,047#12
@Allmedicinefiles · 9,108#13
@SMLEradiance · 4,829#14
@psychsmlechannel · 13,666#15
@GSurgeryReview · 18,071#16
@dec2020q · 26,102#17
@WafaOBGYN · 35,153#18
@EthicsPsychPicturesMilestones · 8,467#19
@EySiSMLE · 9,908#20
@PediaBox · 5,752#21
@internitis · 7,660#22
@AskMajeed · 2,463#23
@h98dx · 7,162#24
@smlepaediatrics · 18,085#25
@SmleByHamza · 14,961#26
@mystudybaseIT · 844#27
@SurgeryBox · 5,362#28
@smle22olds · 5,069#29
@obgynq · 8,970#30
@Rotation_ex · 7,180#31
@medical_conference · 28,015#32
@Jehad_SMLE · 11,442#33
@SMLEcourse · 5,488#34
@IMCrashSMLE · 9,902#35
@SMLE_medicine · 33,193#36
@MED_cube · 4,794#37
@resChalk · 7,089#38
@TopGsSMLE · 13,717#39
@FM98SMLE · 4,793#40
@SMLE4 · 1,602#41
@SmleKillers · 11,712#42
@BdranSpace · 10,398#43
@QuickRecall · 14,143#44
@JANISHERESMLE · 5,175#45
@SMLE_Prometric · 8,862#46
@SMLN_SMLE · 245#47
@SMLEGOLDEN · 9,483#48
@SMLEWINNER · 3,147#49
@ResearchSteps · 16,256#50
@Dalaanmedicine · 4,754#51
@C4Seniors · 8,571#52
@s1ta24QA · 3,966#53
@mnemonics_2020 · 3,655#54
@medtone · 5,503#55
@medicincollecation · 19,480#56
@smlematerial · 1,085 (as read 22 August 2026)#57
@FarisBinyousef · 7,786#58
@ZWSSURGERY1 · 4,267#59
@Hamoud_Almubki · 3,492#60
@KSA_Med_Research · 3,863#61
@Dr_Munthir · 9,518#62
@FamilyPhysician_1 · 28,193#63
@smlebrainspace · 507#64
@MyScriptMark · 2,326#65
@medicalmnemonics1 · 5,980#66
@ninjasmle · 14,081#67
@MD1TALKSMLE · 11,741#68
@AskBdran · 3,050#69
@ASMA_smle · 13,292#70
@SMLE_Surgery · 9,971#71
@SMLEsecrets · 10,485#72
@FocusSMLE · 5,633#73
@altowairqi96 · 3,299#74
@MedicalEducation360 · 1,963#75
@postgraduationroad · 6,422#76
@smlesmle · 1,796 (as read 22 August 2026)#77
@sgmsaad · 16,645#78
@growteam22 · 3,029#79
@FM_notes · 8,228#80
@FMOHATBARA · 5,284#81
@smletwasul · 697#82
@medicalgateMD · 2,173#83
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 22 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@dec2020q · 26,102
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 13 September 2026
@smlemay · 30,105
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 7 September 2026
@Elaf_Faisal · 34,108
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
@fairdaily · 29,092
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 9 September 2026
@SMLE_medicine · 33,193
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 4 September 2026
@WafaOBGYN · 35,153
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 2 September 2026
@USMLEOnlineMedED · 30,021
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 7 September 2026
@ksamedicaljobs · 74,268
Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 19 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Silent, September 💥” (@silent_2026_2027), 59,846 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/silent_2026_2027.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.