Channel
@silencekey
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
25subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001409974776 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @silencekey |
| Description | Микроблог |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 21 March 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 11 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/silencekey |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Aug 2026, 09:05 | 25 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:54 | 25 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 21 March 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 April 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1 | 50.0% | |
| 💅 | 1 | 50.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 March 2021 to 7 April 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @silencekey. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 16 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 March 2021 to 7 April 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Сделал небольшого бота для проверки монеток > ETH, BSC, Polygon, Arbitrum, Base > Как агрегатор некоторых сервисов + дополнительный чек > Можно использовать inline в любом чате @recursio_bot 0xTokenAddress; > Можно добавить в группу/чат @recursio_bot / recursio.xyz
Я кинул 400k+ шариков и вот что я понял: казино всегда в плюсе, наверное. Плинко можно назвать проверкой удачи, закинул 75$, которые не жалко, и пошел спамить скриптом по минималке 0.1$ . Через 2 часа и 21к шариков дало первый x999. Шанс вроде небольшой, но и не 0, а 0.0031%. В любом случае, он больше лотерей. За два дня баланс в пике 854$. Конечно классно, но если так везет, зачем останавливаться)) Постепенно падае…
💅1
Как родился так и умер, дорого содержать такое)) Минимум целых 30$ в месяц, при учете [нейро]дедупликации постов Больше постов - дороже, бот работал на каналах тг парсерах, где достаточное кол-во информации без заёбов) В целом крутой вайбкод опыт)
Накидал парсер/агрегатор крипто говна - отфильтровывает дубликаты и все что не клейм/airdrop @craggach
Иии Апдейт для Hexacore, они поменяли домен: https://gist.github.com/shiftmeplease/78454ac303987ea837d809d1e04ac062
Спустя тысячу минут: https://teletype.in/@oamen/okxracer Надеюсь покрыл большинство вопросов.
OKX Racer автотапалка через devtools в телеге, за один лайк дропаю гайд 😎 Может быть, попроще реализую; Энивей, без рефов там делать нечего Инсайд - это первая игра, скорее всего будут еще(по крайне мере так видно по коду) И, к сожалению, либо я не нашел как, параллельно несколько запросов не дают отправить, чтобы муьтиплаер/комбо абузить
❤1
Сейчас рекламится @HexacoinBot Вероятнее всего их основная группа с новостями накручена Защита, не знаю есть ли она в тапалках - не очень солидная Например, можно посмотреть чужой баланс: https://ago-api.onrender.com/api/balance/619525186 А так же, его рефов, уровень и прочее; При желании можно автоматизировать тапание 🥳
Видео о том, как обойти фильтр цензуры chatgpt (и, скорее всего, других сервисов). Если задуматься, плюс почитать новости (какие-то гос служащие РФ заливали документы в chatgpt) – можно сделать вывод, а том, что sensitive данные лучше туда не отправлять 🥸 https://youtu.be/FTRSJaIAF8Y?si=G1VTkEGNUfPpvyux
Web3 почта, хранилище и документы — skiff.com Просто интересная находка, приложение позволяет получать письма на почту вида 0x0000000000000000000000000000000000000000@skiff.com с возможностями кастомизации (надо же как монетизировать сервис). Присутствует end-to-end шифрование для писем внутри сервиса, однако несовсем прозрачно, что происходит с внешними письмами вне сервиса. 😳 Хранилище тоже зашифровано, чтобы по…
JA3 / SSL fingerprint Знали ли вы, что смена IP, порта или X509 сертификатов - не меняет ваш ja3 отпечаток? TLS Fingerprinting предназначен для быстрой идентификации известных TLS-соединений и отслеживания неизвестных TLS-соединений. Входные данные принимаются либо посредством прослушивания трафика, либо при чтении PCAP файлов. Статья EN Статья RU
Выглядит интересно, по факту просто браузер с плагинами 🥸 Из 'анонимности' только поддержка HNS и ENS доменов. https://www.pumabrowser.com/
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @silencekey. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“skiddie” (@silencekey), 25 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/silencekey.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.