Channel
@signatanews
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Cite this entry
151subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001357815787 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @signatanews |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/signatanews |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Aug 2026, 07:37 | 151 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 03:05 | 150 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 151 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 151 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 18 March 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
31 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 58.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👏 | 18 | 58.1% | |
| 👍 | 8 | 25.8% | |
| ❤ | 5 | 16.1% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 31 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2023 to 31 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 19 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The owner of this channel has been inactive for the last 11 months. If they remain inactive for the next 27 days, they may lose their account and admin rights in this channel. The contents of the channel will remain accessible for all users.
The proposal was canceled before execution by someone in the community - thank you to that person!
👏4👍2
⚠️⚠️⚠️ Reminder to vote down the scam proposals on the DAO! These proposals are attempting to approve spending the entire DAO treasury, so it's critical that they do not pass vote!
The wallet that has been opening scam proposals (0x849635d7ea4C145DC214Bfcfa48704cE9De090c5) has been blacklisted from dSATA. SATA has no blacklisting capabilities so they can still transfer SATA around, but they can't use SATA for attempting DAO attacks anyway.
And the scammer has opened another proposal on the DAO. Also please vote this down: https://www.tally.xyz/gov/signata-dao/proposal/107298230132309265321587661440115760419358055044259942936392760172984564596139 We will cancel the timelock on these proposals if they pass, it's just safer to vote it down so it doesn't even get to the timelock stage.
Another scam proposal has been opened on the DAO. These seem to be happening everywhere now. Please vote it down when voting goes live: https://www.tally.xyz/gov/signata-dao/proposal/32238162185351225708121555832911051513774111859545818043931220860217931870254
Thankyou to the community for voting down the malicious DAO proposal 👏
👏4
Someone has opened a malicious DAO proposal on the Signata DAO. It's just a shakedown attempt to try to receive a "reward" for "reporting" the attack. They tried to be tricky by not giving it a title so there's nothing to click on in the Tally website, but here's a direct link to vote it down: https://www.tally.xyz/gov/signata-dao/proposal/1296585299064997681704705818318388645909496958350216342735488066006111111585
👍3❤1
https://github.com/congruentlabs/sata-contracts-v1/blob/main/contracts/SignataRightV2-draft.sol This is the second (incomplete) draft of V2 rights. See the discord channel for more details about the implementation.
👏4
This isn't a very high risk to the project. Multichain is a liquidity-based bridge, and the liquidity held there isn't a significant amount. We will just remove it to address any threats that may be affecting the project.
https://blog.chainalysis.com/reports/multichain-exploit-july-2023/
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @signatanews. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Signata Project Announcements” (@signatanews), 151 subscribers as measured 28 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/signatanews.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.