Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 📈Trading Signals by Andrew

Channel

📈Trading Signals by Andrew

@signandrew

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

124,737subscribers

+25,760 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003662488924
TypeChannel
Username@signandrew
DescriptionMarket reviews. Do not constitute financial advice. Join
CreatedBetween 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/signandrew

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

98,977124,737111,8577 August 2026 — 98,977 subscribers8 August 2026 — 99,063 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99,369 subscribers10 August 2026 — 99,688 subscribers11 August 2026 — 99,993 subscribers11 August 2026 — 100,232 subscribers12 August 2026 — 100,493 subscribers14 August 2026 — 100,849 subscribers15 August 2026 — 101,072 subscribers16 August 2026 — 101,457 subscribers18 August 2026 — 101,831 subscribers18 August 2026 — 101,971 subscribers19 August 2026 — 102,128 subscribers20 August 2026 — 102,315 subscribers21 August 2026 — 102,483 subscribers23 August 2026 — 102,832 subscribers25 August 2026 — 104,377 subscribers25 August 2026 — 105,776 subscribers27 August 2026 — 107,350 subscribers28 August 2026 — 108,924 subscribers29 August 2026 — 110,428 subscribers30 August 2026 — 111,622 subscribers31 August 2026 — 111,880 subscribers1 September 2026 — 112,269 subscribers2 September 2026 — 112,546 subscribers3 September 2026 — 112,881 subscribers5 September 2026 — 113,412 subscribers8 September 2026 — 114,423 subscribers11 September 2026 — 115,082 subscribers13 September 2026 — 115,552 subscribers14 September 2026 — 116,083 subscribers16 September 2026 — 116,593 subscribers19 September 2026 — 117,079 subscribers25 September 2026 — 124,737 subscribers7 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 49 days, net +25,760. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95,113–128,601 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 16:18124,737+7,658
19 Sept 2026, 01:19117,079+486
16 Sept 2026, 15:18116,593+510
14 Sept 2026, 17:57116,083+531
13 Sept 2026, 02:42115,552+470
11 Sept 2026, 07:42115,082+659
8 Sept 2026, 15:58114,423+1,011
5 Sept 2026, 06:19113,412+531
3 Sept 2026, 10:14112,881+335
2 Sept 2026, 05:24112,546+277
1 Sept 2026, 03:59112,269+389
31 Aug 2026, 02:23111,880+258
30 Aug 2026, 05:35111,622+1,194
29 Aug 2026, 04:13110,428+1,504
28 Aug 2026, 01:23108,924+1,574
27 Aug 2026, 01:03107,350+1,574
25 Aug 2026, 23:14105,776+1,399
25 Aug 2026, 00:43104,377+1,545
23 Aug 2026, 09:44102,832+349
21 Aug 2026, 19:19102,483first reading

Engagement

1,469 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 111 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.75%
avg views ÷ 124,737 subscribers
Avg views / post
7,170
791 posts measured
Reaction rate
0%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
791
of 1,469 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 11 of 791 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 30 September 2026
Posts held1,469 (7 August 2026 – 30 September 2026)
Views total5,669,786
Reactions total0
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken30 Sept 2026, 10:24 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,420
Videos
≈117
Links
≈1,220

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 30 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 05s
Average length
30s

Measured directly from 12 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
6
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 0.6%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @signandrew. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

30 Sept 2026, 10:12 UTC609 viewsread 30 September 2026
Photo

Net Profit: ➕2,446$ Just wrapped up today’s trading session. As always, I keep things fully transparent every trade, every result is real and verifiable 💬 Text me START and I’ll guide you step by step on how to join and begin earning - @Andrey_Evans

Showing the 12 most recent of 1,469 posts we hold for @signandrew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@signandrew edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
5 September 2026
Most recent edit
5 September 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 13 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

29 Sept 2026, 18:16 UTCAnonymous Poll467 voters

How has the current market situation affected your trading?

  1. 📈 My results have improved27%
  2. ➖ No significant changes25%
  3. 📉 My results have worsened26%
  4. 👀 Just here to see the results21%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

28 Sept 2026, 05:43 UTCAnonymous Poll498 voters

What are your plans for this week?

  1. 🔥 Actively trading27%
  2. 📰 Waiting for the news results and then joining in15%
  3. 👀 Just watching the market for now20%
  4. 📊 Looking for trading opportunities21%
  5. 📚 Not trading / learning for now16%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Sept 2026, 18:22 UTCAnonymous Quiz469 voters

A slowdown in price movement can be used as one of the signals that an impulse is losing strength

  1. True52%
  2. False48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Sept 2026, 18:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz464 voters

In the "Impulse → Weakness → Entry" strategy, the trader should enter against the move before any signs of weakness appear

  1. True52%
  2. False48%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

26 Sept 2026, 18:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz462 voters

What should you look for after a strong price impulse before considering a pullback entry?

  1. Signs that momentum is weakening28%
  2. The largest candle on the chart23%
  3. An entry immediately after the impulse begins24%
  4. A random change in timeframe24%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Sept 2026, 07:12 UTCAnonymous Poll473 voters

What is your main barrier in trading right now?

  1. No consistent entries 🎯30%
  2. Risk management mistakes 📉25%
  3. Lack of experience 🧠22%
  4. Not starting on time ⏳23%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 25 August 2026 to 30 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“📈Trading Signals by Andrew” (@signandrew), 124,737 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/signandrew.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.