Channel
@signandrew
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
100,849subscribers
+1,872 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1003662488924 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @signandrew |
| Description | Market reviews. Do not constitute financial advice. Join |
| Created | Between 1 December 2025 and 31 May 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/signandrew |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 02:35 | 100,849 | +356 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 100,493 | +261 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 22:52 | 100,232 | +239 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:57 | 99,993 | +305 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:14 | 99,688 | +319 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 99,369 | +306 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 03:53 | 99,063 | +86 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:15 | 98,977 | first reading |
170 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 6 of 170 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 170 (7 August 2026 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 1,244,744 |
| Reactions total | 0 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Aug 2026, 07:56 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @signandrew. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 170 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
❔ Why did I choose binary options? Binary options are a tool for predicting asset price movements over a specific period of time. Here are their main advantages: ✅ Simplicity - two outcomes: win or lose. You just need to predict whether the price will be higher or lower than the set level ✅ Fixed risk - you know in advance how much you can lose or earn ✅ Fast results - expiry times range from a few seconds to a f…
Photo, posted without a caption
🙌 Team, let’s do a bit of work together! Right now, before the session, I’m ready to take 3 people and either teach you from scratch or help you break down your mistakes. 🎯 The main goal is to show that the path to stable trading is shorter than it seems 📈 Plan is simple: 1. You send me your recent trading stats 2. We figure out what went wrong 3. In a personal trading format, we trade together and you learn not t…
☀️ Good morning! A new day - new opportunities for growth and success. Time for new trades, fresh ideas, and precise decisions 💼 Remember, every step brings you closer to your goal. Let’s start the day with focus and confidence! 📈 💬Reviews Channel | Write me ✍
How good it feels to unwind in places like this after an intense trading day to slow down and simply enjoy the moment Friends, remember: it’s not only important to know how to work well you also need to know how to rest properly That thing between your ears tends to overheat sometimes😁 and when it does, it directly affects your emotional control and decision-making ☝️That’s why you should always make time for your…
Video message, posted without a caption
💪 Ready for the final push? Right now, I’ve found a strong trading pair that’s working exactly by the book 📊 Price has rejected a resistance level, and there’s nothing holding it back from moving further down 🟢Get 3–6 signals in one session 🟢Start with $500, target $1,500+ 🟢No trading experience required 💬 Message me NIGHT and wait for my reply - @Andrey_Evans
⚡️⚡️⚡️⚡️ 🚀 I had a great run of scalp trades I'll take on 3️⃣ more people for the night trading session: @Andrey_Evans
Photo, posted without a caption
🔵10 spots for Copy Trading 🔵 I’m opening a new group for those who want to trade with me without sitting in front of the charts all day 🔵 Starting balance - $1,000 You connect your account, follow the setup, and the trades are copied automatically while you simply monitor the process No searching for entries, no random decisions, no need to overcomplicate it I’m taking only 1️⃣0️⃣ people this time so I can keep …
🚀 Fresh start, clean execution Today’s personal session ended with 3 profitable trades out of 3 and +$1,012 in pure profit What made the difference was the timing - no rushed entries, no chasing candles, just waiting for the right moment and executing exactly as planned 😁 That’s what I want people to take from personal trading - not just the result, but the ability to understand what we’re doing and repeat it with…
🙋♂️ Why do I work this way? Friends, I see a lot of new people joining who don’t yet understand how we work here 👨💻 I’ve been earning through financial analysis and personal work with clients in deposit management for over 7 years. I’m your personal consultant, helping you find the most effective trading decisions. 👉 A $500 working deposit is not a payment to me ✅ It’s your confirmation that you’re serious and wa…
Showing the 12 most recent of 170 posts we hold for @signandrew. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 6 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Would you like to share a free profitable strategy with me?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
WHAT DO YOU USUALLY DO AFTER A LOSING TRADE?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
WHAT ANNOYS YOU THE MOST IN TRADING? 😄
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
What is the hardest part of trading for you?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
📈What matters most to you in trading?
The shares total 117%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
⚡️ When do you lose money most often?
The shares total 111%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 170 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 14 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“📈Trading Signals by Andrew” (@signandrew), 100,849 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/signandrew.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.